top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 11:29:11 am

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This...

Shinde dilutes demand

Likely to be content with Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai Mumbai: In a decisive shift that redraws the power dynamics of Maharashtra’s urban politics, the standoff over the prestigious Mumbai Mayor’s post has ended with a strategic compromise. Following days of resort politics and intense backroom negotiations, the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena has reportedly diluted its demand for the top job in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), settling instead for the Deputy Mayor’s post. This development, confirmed by high-ranking party insiders, follows the realization that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) effectively ceded its claims on the Kalyan-Dombivali Municipal Corporation (KDMC) to protect the alliance, facilitating a “Mumbai for BJP, Kalyan for Shinde” power-sharing formula. The compromise marks a complete role reversal between the BJP and the Shiv Sena. Both the political parties were in alliance with each other for over 25 years before 2017 civic polls. Back then the BJP used to get the post of Deputy Mayor while the Shiv Sena always enjoyed the mayor’s position. In 2017 a surging BJP (82 seats) had paused its aggression to support the undivided Shiv Sena (84 seats), preferring to be out of power in the Corporation to keep the saffron alliance intact. Today, the numbers dictate a different reality. In the recently concluded elections BJP emerged as the single largest party in Mumbai with 89 seats, while the Shinde faction secured 29. Although the Shinde faction acted as the “kingmaker”—pushing the alliance past the majority mark of 114—the sheer numerical gap made their claim to the mayor’s post untenable in the long run. KDMC Factor The catalyst for this truce lies 40 kilometers north of Mumbai in Kalyan-Dombivali, a region considered the impregnable fortress of Eknath Shinde and his son, MP Shrikant Shinde. While the BJP performed exceptionally well in KDMC, winning 50 seats compared to the Shinde faction’s 53, the lotter for the reservation of mayor’s post in KDMC turned the tables decisively in favor of Shiv Sena there. In the lottery, the KDMC mayor’ post went to be reserved for the Scheduled Tribe candidate. The BJP doesn’t have any such candidate among elected corporatros in KDMC. This cleared the way for Shiv Sena. Also, the Shiv Sena tied hands with the MNS in the corporation effectively weakening the Shiv Sena (UBT)’s alliance with them. Party insiders suggest that once it became clear the BJP would not pursue the KDMC Mayor’s chair—effectively acknowledging it as Shinde’s fiefdom—he agreed to scale down his demands in the capital. “We have practically no hope of installing a BJP Mayor in Kalyan-Dombivali without shattering the alliance locally,” a Mumbai BJP secretary admitted and added, “Letting the KDMC become Shinde’s home turf is the price for securing the Mumbai Mayor’s bungalow for a BJP corporator for the first time in history.” The formal elections for the Mayoral posts are scheduled for later this month. While the opposition Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA)—led by the Shiv Sena (UBT)—has vowed to field candidates, the arithmetic heavily favors the ruling alliance. For Eknath Shinde, accepting the Deputy Mayor’s post in Mumbai is a tactical retreat. It allows him to consolidate his power in the MMR belt (Thane and Kalyan) while remaining a partner in Mumbai’s governance. For the BJP, this is a crowning moment; after playing second fiddle in the BMC for decades, they are poised to finally install their own “First Citizen” of Mumbai.

Sacred Spectacle

Updated: Mar 3, 2025

The recently concluded Maha Kumbh 2025 in Prayagraj was nothing short of a logistical marvel. Over 650 million devotees - twice the population of the United States - took the holy dip at the Triveni Sangam. Far more than a religious congregation, it was a demonstration of India’s organizational prowess, seamlessly blending tradition with modern management. The festival generated 1.2 million jobs and injected $36 billion into Uttar Pradesh’s economy. Yet, the event has faced relentless criticism from opposition parties and left-leaning intellectuals who, rather than acknowledging this extraordinary feat, have dismissed it as state-sponsored religious extravagance.


Instead of appreciating the deeply rooted faith of crores of Hindus, many prefer to paint the Kumbh Mela as an affront to secularism. But their argument rings hollow. If secularism entails equal treatment of all religions, why do only Hindu temples remain under state control? The government has, for decades, expropriated tens of billions from temple revenues while allowing institutions of other faiths to operate independently. To decry Yogi Adityanath’s decision to allocate funds for the Maha Kumbh without acknowledging the disproportionate financial burden placed on Hindu religious institutions is intellectual dishonesty at best.


Even the world’s top academics recognize Maha Kumbh’s logistical achievement. Harvard researchers have studied its temporary city, built with simple materials and incredible efficiency, as a model for urban planning. Few mass gatherings of this scale anywhere in the world manage to provide clean water, sanitation, crowd management and emergency services with such precision. Countries struggling with refugee crises and disaster management could well take notes from the organizers of Maha Kumbh 2025. Yet, while foreign scholars marvel at this achievement, India’s own intellectual elite refuse to acknowledge it.


However, the grandeur of the event should not obscure the lessons that must be learned. Despite meticulous planning, a tragic stampede on one of the most auspicious bathing days claimed at least 30 lives and injured 60 others. This is unacceptable. India has hosted these grand events for centuries, and yet crowd-control failures persist. With the next Kumbh Mela set to take place in 2027 at Nashik on the banks of the Godavari, authorities must ensure that such tragedies do not recur. The success of this year’s Maha Kumbh should not breed complacency but serve as a blueprint for further refinement. The Kumbh Mela, as it has evolved, is not merely a Hindu festival but an economic and cultural powerhouse, a demonstration of India’s ability to manage complexity on an unprecedented scale. It is time for critics to move beyond their ideological blinkers and recognize the event for what it is: a triumph of faith, governance and economic vitality. The Maha Kumbh does not need validation from the secular elite; its sanctity and success are already etched into India’s civilizational memory. What remains to be done is to ensure that its next chapter in Nashik is not only as grand but also safer for the millions who will gather in devotion once again.

Comments


bottom of page