top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

SS MP threatens to ‘bomb’ political opponents

Journalists staged a protest outside Balasaheb Bhavan against Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Dina Patil, condemning his alleged remarks against members of the media. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Mumbai North-East MP Sanjay Dina-Patil – who recently defected to the ruling ally Shiv Sena apparently went haywire on Thursday, hurling bomb threats at political opponents, spitting expletives at protestors, warning jounos of assault and warning anybody “to do whatever you can”, sparking a massive political...

SS MP threatens to ‘bomb’ political opponents

Journalists staged a protest outside Balasaheb Bhavan against Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Dina Patil, condemning his alleged remarks against members of the media. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Mumbai North-East MP Sanjay Dina-Patil – who recently defected to the ruling ally Shiv Sena apparently went haywire on Thursday, hurling bomb threats at political opponents, spitting expletives at protestors, warning jounos of assault and warning anybody “to do whatever you can”, sparking a massive political furore. Elected on a Shiv Sena (UBT) ticket, Dina-Patil lost his temper when he was questioned on his daughter and SS (UBT) Municipal Corporator Rajool Patil who went to meet ex-CM Uddhav Thackeray to express her allegiance despite her father’s defection to the Shiv Sena led by Deputy CM Eknath Shinde. Instead of replying, Dina-Patil, reported to be short-tempered, blew his top and reacted aggressively with abuses: “Record this on camera… I have spoken to you for 2 minutes, I respect you, you should do the same… Don’t mess with me. If you return here, I will thrash and send you back. I am saying this in front of the police, you do whatever you want.” Just a couple of days ago, Dina-Patil had threatened SS (UBT) workers protesting against him. “Anybody who tries to cross my path, I will send them to the crematorium or the hospital. We have committed five murders in the past. If you protest against me, I will throw bombs on you and enter your house to hammer you.” As these threats and unparliamentary language stoked a massive political row, SS (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut shot off a letter to Mumbai Commissioner of Police Deven Bharti, demanding that the police probe all the statements of Dina-Patil and ‘book him for murder’. On the alleged bomb threats, Raut said if Dina-Patil had acquired the explosives from some terrorist organisation, he should be arrested under the dreaded Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, dealing with terrorism, terming it as a matter of national security. Political Explosion The matter escalated into a full-fledged political brawl with Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) leaders like Congress’ Nana Patole, Vijay Wadettiwar; SS (UBT)’s Aditya Thackeray, Sunil Raut, Sushma Andhare; Nationalist Congress Party (SP)’s Supriya Sule, Dr. Jitendra Awhad, Jayant R. Patil, and many more, attacking Dina-Patil and demanding that Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis must act in the matter. Aditya challenged Dina-Patil to instantly quit as MP, recontest in the name of Shinde or PM Narendra Modi and then see the outcome. Andhare said till the MPs were with SS (UBT), they were cultured but after walking over to the Shiv Sena, they have lost all their etiquettes or fear of the laws. Faced with an embarrassing backlash, Bharatiya Janata Party’s Chandrashekhar Bawankule and Shiv Sena’s Omprakash Babarao alias Bachhu Kadu quickly tendered unconditional apologies to the media on behalf of Dina-Patil, while Minister Girish Mahajan attempted to equate the outburst with recent strong language used by Sanjay Raut, who had said that “Shinde has given birth to 6 traitors”. On Raut’s letter to the CoP, a defiant Dina-Patil declared: “Whatever I said, I did it openly. If the police feel any action is to be taken against me, I am ready to face the consequences.” He again slammed the media persons for "thrusting microphones at him”, going to the ‘other side’ (the MVA) and then returning to quiz him, prompting the TV Journalists Association and other media groups to protest and seek action against the belligerent MP. “Has the MP been provided (Y-Plus) security at public expense to threaten the media which is doing its duty or the political protesters?” asked an irate TV reporter. Dina-Patil launched a broadside against the MVA and dared those who dubbed him a ‘traitor’ to come to his constituency without any security. On the incident of five murders, he airily said: “It had happened before I was born”, but Raut retorted claiming to possess details of all those alleged killings. “I don’t need an entourage of 10 vehicles as I rule the hearts of the people. I have aligned myself with ‘real men’. Shinde Saheb has commended me for my stand,” he claimed. Fadnavis and Shinde commented briefly on the matter and later were closeted in a meeting to discuss the fallout of Dina-Patil’s utterances especially after the media launched strong protests in different parts of Mumbai.

Sands of Secession

A Saudi–Emirati rift, not Yemen’s civil war, is now shaping the fate of the Arabian Peninsula’s poorest state.

Yemen has never lacked for factions, but rarely have its internal quarrels so nakedly mirrored the rivalries of its foreign patrons. The latest drama in the south where forces loyal to Yemen’s internationally recognised government have pushed out the Southern Transitional Council (STC) from the vast provinces of Hadramout and al-Mahra seems like a routine reshuffling of power in a country accustomed to chaos on the surface. But in fact, it marks the open unravelling of the Saudi-Emirati condominium that has underwritten the war since 2015.


Rashad al-Alimi, head of Yemen’s Saudi-backed Presidential Leadership Council, declared that government forces had retaken the two eastern provinces and that all armed groups would now operate under the command of the Saudi-led coalition. That pronouncement was meant less for Yemenis than for foreign ears. Hadramout and al-Mahra account for nearly half of Yemen’s landmass and abut Saudi Arabia’s long, porous border. Control of them gives Riyadh a strategic glacis against Houthi infiltration and Iranian influence. Losing them to the STC - a militia-cum-political movement backed by the United Arab Emirates - had been a humiliation. Regaining them was send a message that Saudi Arabia, and not Abu Dhabi, calls the shots in Yemen’s east.


Yet in Aden, the STC’s bastion, thousands poured onto the streets waving the flag of the old People’s Democratic Republic of Yemen, which existed as a Marxist state until unification in 1990. Their chants were aimed not at the Houthis, who still control the capital, Sanaa, but at Saudi Arabia and the government it sponsors. The STC’s demand is simple and combustible: the resurrection of an independent South Yemen. Its leaders have long argued that unification brought neglect and plunder by northern elites. Many southerners agree. What has changed is that this grievance has become entangled with a regional power struggle.


Saudi Arabia and the UAE went to war together to prevent the Houthis, an Iran-aligned movement, from dominating Yemen. But their visions for the country have diverged. Riyadh wants a pliant, nominally unified Yemen that secures its southern border. Abu Dhabi, more commercially minded, has built a network of proxy militias along Yemen’s coast and islands, from Aden to Socotra, securing shipping lanes and ports. The STC is the most prominent of these proxies. For the UAE, a friendly, semi-autonomous south offers leverage over trade routes in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. For Saudi Arabia, it threatens to fragment a neighbour it wants to stabilise.


The drama surrounding Aidarous al-Zubaidi, the STC’s elusive leader, underlines how poisonous this rivalry has become. Expelled from Yemen’s Presidential Leadership Council and accused of treason, Mr Zubaidi failed to turn up for talks in Riyadh. Saudi officials allege that Emirati officers spirited him out, first by boat to Somalia and then by military aircraft to Abu Dhabi. The UAE denies wrongdoing.


The STC’s Riyadh-based delegation has since announced the group’s dissolution, citing internal rifts and regional pressure. Few believe that southern separatism has suddenly evaporated. But the announcement reveals how exposed the STC is without Emirati cover.


None of this brings Yemen any closer to peace. The Houthis remain entrenched in the north, buoyed by Iranian weapons and by Saudi Arabia’s desire to extricate itself from an expensive stalemate. Riyadh has been quietly negotiating with them, even as it cracks down on Emirati-backed secessionists in the south. The war that began as a bid to restore Yemen’s recognised government has become a juggling act: containing Iran, managing the UAE, and avoiding further disintegration.


For Yemenis, the country’s modern history is a cycle of unity and rupture. Unification in 1990 was followed by a southern secession attempt in 1994, crushed by the north. The Arab Spring toppled Ali Abdullah Saleh but unleashed forces that no coalition could control. Today, Yemen is effectively partitioned among the Houthis, the government, and a mosaic of militias.


The latest battles in Hadramout and al-Mahra do not change that fundamental fact. What they do change is the balance among Yemen’s foreign patrons. A Saudi-Emirati divorce would be more destabilising than any local uprising. Without a semblance of coordination between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi, Yemen risks becoming not just a proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran, but a theatre for Gulf rivalries as well.

Comments


bottom of page