top of page

By:

Quad Najmi and PTI

17 June 2026 at 5:11:32 pm

Uddhav faces another rebellion; decision today

Six Lok Sabha MPs trying to move away; picture may be clear at today’s Parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi AI generated image Mumbai: A cloak-and-dagger crisis engulfing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has landed at the door of the Lok Sabha Speaker, with the party urging him to guard against any unlawful defection and issuing a whip directing its MPs to attend a meeting in Delhi on Thursday. Amid the escalating crisis, a group of rebel Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders is learnt to have met...

Uddhav faces another rebellion; decision today

Six Lok Sabha MPs trying to move away; picture may be clear at today’s Parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi AI generated image Mumbai: A cloak-and-dagger crisis engulfing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena has landed at the door of the Lok Sabha Speaker, with the party urging him to guard against any unlawful defection and issuing a whip directing its MPs to attend a meeting in Delhi on Thursday. Amid the escalating crisis, a group of rebel Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders is learnt to have met Speaker Om Birla informally on Wednesday, claiming the support of six of the party's nine MPs in the Lower House, sources said. Thursday's high-stakes meeting in Delhi will legally and physically define whether Uddhav Thackeray retains his parliamentary strength or faces another devastating party division, the third since Raj Thackeray split Shiv Sena in 2006. Sources in Sena (UBT) said the rival camp still doesn't have the support of six MPs. They claim two of the six rebels have reportedly changed their mind. In a swift counter-offensive to contain the damage, the party high command issued a mandatory three-line whip, summoning an emergency parliamentary party meeting in New Delhi on Thursday to force a physical showdown where the MPs will have to mark their presence physically. The developments triggered a day of high political drama in the national capital, marked by a furious, expletive-laden press conference by Raut, a reported counter-meeting by the rebel faction with Lok Sabha Speaker Birla, and sharp condemnation from the Congress. The internal fracture was visible at Sanjay Raut's press briefing, where only three other Lok Sabha MPs, Arvind Sawant, Anil Desai, and Rajabhau Waje, stood by him. The remaining six lawmakers were conspicuously absent; their exact whereabouts are unknown. The Sena (UBT) has nine MPs in the Lok Sabha, and at least two‑thirds of them would be required to form a separate group. Apart from Desai, Waje and Sawant, the other six MPs are Sanjay Patil, Sanjay Deshmukh, Omprakash Raje Nimbalkar, Bhausaheb Wakchaure, Nagesh Patil-Ashtikar and Sanjay Jadhav Not Reachable The six MPs stopped responding or became unavailable since Wednesday forenoon, after which the party stopped contacting them. They said when the party contacted Mumbai North East MP, Sanjay Dina Patil, he told party leaders that he was not with the rebel group. The party had asked them to submit a letter to the Lok Sabha Speaker, which he has not submitted so far. Later in the day, sources claimed that the group of six rebel lawmakers had privately met the Lok Sabha Speaker to claim a two-thirds majority in the Lower House, the precise threshold required to escape disqualification under the anti-defection law. Simultaneously, Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, who split the undivided Shiv Sena in 2022, was reportedly camping in Delhi to oversee the operational layout of the defection of MPs. He returned to his home town Thane in Wednesday night. He is reportedly studying all the legal aspects before taking a final call before the party’s foundation day on Friday. Speaker’s Role Following reports of the rebels' move, a loyalist delegation consisting of Raut, Sawant, and Desai rushed to meet Speaker Birla to file a formal representation urging him to reject any unlawful group alignment. Desai argued that the legal provisions are strictly on the side of the original organisational structure. "Under the law, a splinter group cannot simply merge with another party on its own, even if they have two-thirds support. Only the original administrative party holds that right," Desai told reporters, adding that the Speaker assured them he would thoroughly examine every legal aspect before rendering a decision. The widening panic inside the party also triggered a public, familial disconnect involving missing Hingoli MP Nagesh Patil-Ashtikar. While the MP remained unreachable, his son, Krushna Patil Ashtikar, the MVA's official candidate for Thursday's Maharashtra Legislative Council elections, released a video statement strongly defending Uddhav Thackeray. "I am a Shiv Sainik of Uddhav Thackeray. There is no room for doubt when it comes to me," the younger Ashtikar stated.

Shift Towards Right?

The Kerala government’s move to slash minority scholarships has drawn accusations that Chief Minister Vijayan’s regime was pandering to the BJP.

Kerala
Kerala

In a political climate marked by increasingly blurred ideological lines, Kerala’s Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan finds himself caught between maintaining the Left’s legacy of secularism and navigating the ever-more-confrontational terrain of national politics. Amid Opposition accusations of pandering to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the Kerala government’s move to slash critical scholarships for minority students has irked Muslim and Christian outfits, with the opposition UDF vowing to hit the streets in protest.


Despite the claims of Vijayan’s Marxist regime that the move was to save money, it has raised eyebrows among those who had long viewed the CM as an unflinching defender of Kerala’s secular fabric.


While Kerala’s fiscal constraints are no secret, the scale of the reductions raises an interesting question of whether the move is yet another attempt on Vijayan’s part to ‘appease’ the BJP-led Centre in Delhi or appease the Hindu populace in the state with the aim of preventing saffron inroads in ‘red’ Kerala?


From the Prof. Joseph Mundassery Scholarship to the APJ Abdul Kalam Scholarship, financial support that has helped students from Muslim and Christian communities has been slashed, in some cases by as much as 50 percent. This decision comes despite the allocation of Rs. 87.63 crore for scholarships in the 2024-25 budget, with only 2.69 percent of that amount disbursed in a year that has just two months left.


In a state that has long prided itself on being a bastion of progressive values, the cut to scholarships has been greeted with anger and disbelief. For Muslim Students Federation (MSF) leaders, the decision represents a stark betrayal of the minority communities that the Left has historically championed. The move is seen not only as an attack on educational access for disadvantaged groups but also as an attempt to appease the growing Hindu nationalist sentiments sweeping the nation.


Opposition leader V.D. Satheesan reiterated his accusation of Vijayan allegedly trying to ‘appease’ the BJP.


The BJP’s growing influence in Kerala, beginning with its success in securing a foothold in local elections and its first parliamentary seat in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, has forced the CPI(M) to reconsider its strategy. The BJP’s increasing vote share, especially in constituencies once considered Left strongholds, has prompted a re-evaluation of the Left’s traditional approach to minority communities.


Last year, revelations that Additional Director General of Police M.R. Ajith Kumar had allegedly met with RSS leaders on Vijayan’s say-so had caused a furore.


In this new political calculus, the slashing of minority scholarships can be viewed as a means of appeasing Hindu voters, a demographic that has been steadily courted by the BJP.


The CPI(M) has been battered by internal dissent and external challenges, with allegations of corruption and compromised governance threatening to further weaken its standing. With accusations of an unholy alliance between the CPM and the RSS lingering in the air, Vijayan’s move to cater to the right-wing’s demands has all the markings of a political survival strategy.


It is perhaps no coincidence that the cuts to scholarships come amid a broader effort to divert attention from accusations of government mismanagement, including a controversial public relations campaign designed to bolster Vijayan’s image.


For the Left, the potential cost of these moves could be high. A party that has long prided itself on its secularism and commitment to social justice risks losing both its minority vote and its core supporters, many of whom see the scholarships as a crucial lifeline. Even as Kerala’s political landscape changes, the fear that the CPI(M) is playing a dangerous game of ideological compromise remains palpable.


Vijayan’s actions, whether the product of pragmatism or desperation, have reignited an age-old debate about Kerala’s place in the national political ecosystem. As the BJP tightens its grip on the country, Vijayan’s ‘secular’ credentials face a very real threat of being unmasked.

Comments


bottom of page