top of page

By:

Kaustubh Kale

10 September 2024 at 6:07:15 pm

Silent Money Killer: Loss of Buying Power

In personal finance, we often worry about losing money in the stock market, dislike the volatility associated with equities or mutual funds, or feel anxious about missing out on a hot investment tip. Yet the biggest threat to our wealth is far quieter and far more dangerous: loss of buying power. It is the invisible erosion of your money caused by inflation - a force that operates every single day, without pause, without headlines, and often without being noticed until it is too late....

Silent Money Killer: Loss of Buying Power

In personal finance, we often worry about losing money in the stock market, dislike the volatility associated with equities or mutual funds, or feel anxious about missing out on a hot investment tip. Yet the biggest threat to our wealth is far quieter and far more dangerous: loss of buying power. It is the invisible erosion of your money caused by inflation - a force that operates every single day, without pause, without headlines, and often without being noticed until it is too late.
Inflation does not take away your capital visibly. It does not reduce the number in your bank account. Instead, it reduces what that number can buy. A Rs 100 note today buys far less than what it did ten years ago. This gradual and relentless decline is what truly destroys long-term financial security. The real damage happens when people invest in financial products that earn less than 10 per cent returns, especially over long periods. India’s long-term inflation averages around 6 to 7 per cent. When you add lifestyle inflation - the rising cost of healthcare, education, housing, travel, and personal aspirations - your effective inflation rate is often much higher. So, if you are earning 5 to 8 per cent on your money, you are not growing your wealth. You are moving backward. This is why low-yield products, despite feeling safe, often end up becoming wealth destroyers. Your money appears protected, but its strength - its ability to buy goods, services, experiences, and opportunities - is weakening year after year. Fixed-income products like bank fixed deposits and recurring deposits are essential, but only for short-term goals within the next three years. Beyond that period, the returns simply do not keep pace with inflation. A few products are a financial mess - they are locked in for the long term with poor liquidity and still give less than 8 per cent returns, which creates major problems in your financial goals journey. To genuinely grow wealth, your investments must consistently outperform inflation and achieve more than 10 per cent returns. For long-term financial goals - whether 5, 10, or 20 years away - only a few asset classes have historically achieved this: Direct stocks Equities represent ownership in businesses. As companies grow their revenues and profits, shareholders participate in that growth. Over long horizons, equities remain one of the most reliable inflation-beating asset classes. Equity and hybrid mutual funds These funds offer equity-debt-gold diversification, professional management, and disciplined investment structures that are essential for long-term compounding. Gold Gold has been a time-tested hedge against inflation and periods of economic uncertainty. Ultimately, financial planning is not about protecting your principal. It is about protecting and enhancing your purchasing power. That is what funds your child’s education, your child’s marriage, your retirement lifestyle, and your long-term dreams. Inflation does not announce its arrival. It works silently. The only defense is intelligent asset allocation and a long-term investment mindset. Your money is supposed to work for you. Make sure it continues to do so - not just in numbers, but in real value. (The author is a Chartered Accountant and CFA (USA). Financial Advisor.Views personal. He could be reached on 9833133605.)

Shifting Alliances

Saudi Arabia’s defence pact with Pakistan signals a new phase in Gulf-South Asian security.

ree

Islamabad and Riyadh recently formalised a defence agreement whose origins stretch back more than half a century. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, and Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir presided over a ceremony that yielded an unusually stark declaration: any aggression against either country would be treated as aggression against both. In a region defined by overlapping rivalries, the pact is a recalibration of strategic commitments.

 

Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have long shared military intimacy. Pakistani troops were sent to the kingdom in the late 1960s amid regional instability stemming from Egypt’s intervention in Yemen, a precursor to decades of cooperative arrangements. That partnership deepened after the 1979 Grand Mosque seizure in Mecca, when Pakistani special forces provided critical tactical support. By 1982, a formal Bilateral Security Cooperation Agreement institutionalised the relationship, allowing Pakistani deployments on Saudi soil, arms transfers, and advisory roles, while embedding Islamabad in Riyadh’s defence planning.

 

This latest pact is the first explicit mutual-defence agreement with a nuclear-armed partner, elevating the stakes of a historically discreet alliance. Its timing is significant: Israel’s strike in Qatar, Iran’s growing regional assertiveness, and U.S. uncertainty in the Gulf have created a security vacuum.

 

For Saudi Arabia, the deal is a hedge against Iranian influence, Houthi attacks in Yemen, and the destabilising effects of Israeli–Arab hostilities, while signalling a willingness to assert regional autonomy independent of Washington. For Pakistan, it offers fiscal relief through Saudi investment while bolstering Islamabad’s claim to pan-Islamic security leadership and strengthening its hand in nuclear deterrence dynamics. Analysts suggest the pact may enable Pakistan to purchase American weapons financed indirectly by Riyadh, sidestepping political hurdles in Washington.

 

The pact cannot be disentangled from the Indo-Pak rivalry, which remains the primary determinant of Pakistan’s strategic calculations. Earlier this year, Operation Sindoor saw Indian forces strike deep inside Pakistan-administered territory, inflicting severe damage on Pakistani military infrastructure.

 

Yet, the pact complicates Riyadh’s relationship with New Delhi. India has cultivated deep economic, strategic, and energy ties with Saudi Arabia, with bilateral trade hitting nearly USD 43 billion in fiscal 2023–24. Successive high-level visits, from King Abdullah in 2006 to PM Narendra Modi in 2016, have cemented a strategic partnership. Riyadh has historically sought to mediate Indo-Pakistani tensions, condemning terrorism without criticizing Indian policy. A formal defence alignment with Pakistan risks tilting the kingdom’s neutrality, creating latent friction with India.

 

Saudi Arabia’s defence posture now touches upon the nuclear equation in South Asia, where Pakistan’s capabilities counterbalance India’s conventional superiority. In a wider context, the pact demonstrates how Middle Eastern and South Asian security architectures are intertwined, with conflicts in one region reverberating in the other.

 

For Islamabad, the deal consolidates decades of military diplomacy. Since the Cold War, Pakistan has positioned itself as a security provider for the Muslim world, with Riyadh as a consistent patron. Economically, Saudi backing can relieve pressure on Pakistan’s shrinking foreign-exchange reserves, while politically, it allows Islamabad to project influence without appearing entirely dependent on Washington. Historically, such alignments have been double-edged: Pakistan’s Cold War entanglements yielded short-term gains but deepened confrontation with India and drew Islamabad into Afghanistan’s quagmire. Saudi Arabia has oscillated between caution and assertiveness, from the 1991 Gulf War to interventions in Yemen, highlighting the risks inherent in formalised defence commitments.

 

India’s response has been measured but wary. Yet the subtext is clear: a nuclear-armed Pakistan bound to a major Gulf power alters regional deterrence and complicates New Delhi’s strategic calculations. It could shift the balance of influence in the Indian Ocean and Arabian Peninsula.

 

The Saudi-Pakistani pact is a signal of the persistent relevance of historical ties, the fragility of regional balances, and the tangled web of interests linking South Asia, the Gulf, and the wider Middle East, where rivalries between Iran, Israel, and the United States intersect with South Asian fault lines. For Islamabad, it is a victory in prestige and finance. For Riyadh, a hedge against uncertainty.

Comments


bottom of page