top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Stopping Venezuela, Strangling India

U.S. President Donald Trump takes aim at Venezuelan crude oil, with India caught in the crossfire.

Donald Trump has fired another salvo in his trade wars, this time at Venezuela. The U.S. President has announced a sweeping 25 percent tariff on any country that dares to import Venezuelan oil, effectively weaponizing global energy markets against Nicolás Maduro’s regime. The announcement, made on Trump’s Truth Social platform, cited Venezuela’s alleged export of criminals (including members of the notorious Tren de Aragua gang) as the reason for this economic punishment. The move, however, has little to do with crime and everything to do with geopolitics.


India, which has become Venezuela’s largest buyer of crude, now finds itself in an awkward position. If Trump’s tariffs are enforced, Indian oil giants like Reliance Industries and Indian Oil Corporation will have to rethink their procurement strategies. Given that India imported a staggering 22 million barrels from Venezuela in 2023, amounting to 1.5 percent of its total crude purchases, the implications could be costly.


Trump’s move is less about punishing Venezuela than coercing U.S. allies into compliance - a familiar tactic from his first term, notably against Iran. But Venezuela lacks Tehran’s geopolitical clout or sanctions-proof trade networks. Instead, it wields oil as both a lifeline and a weapon, a strategy dating back to Hugo Chávez’s defiance of American dominance.


Before U.S. sanctions throttled its economy, Venezuela was the third-largest supplier of crude to the United States, exporting over 1.5 million barrels per day in the early 2000s. Chávez used oil to cement alliances, offering preferential deals to Cuba and other left-leaning governments. His successor, Nicolás Maduro, continued this trend, albeit under grimmer economic conditions. The U.S. crackdown on Venezuelan oil in 2019 forced Caracas to turn to alternative buyers, chief among them, India and China.


For India, Trump’s move complicates an already delicate balancing act. Indian refiners have increasingly relied on Venezuelan crude, especially after American sanctions on Russian oil narrowed their options. The appeal of Venezuelan oil lies in its deep discounts, often undercutting Middle Eastern crude by $15 to $20 per barrel. This makes it particularly attractive for price-sensitive Indian refiners.


If imposed, Trump’s tariffs would force Indian refiners to pay a premium on Venezuelan crude, effectively neutralizing the price advantage. The tariffs could deter Indian firms from dealing with Venezuela altogether, pushing them back towards more expensive Middle Eastern suppliers.


India’s economy is surging, with oil demand projected to rise steadily over the next decade. The country is on track to overtake China as the world’s largest driver of oil consumption growth by 2030. While India scrambles for alternatives, China stands to benefit. Beijing, already Venezuela’s second-largest oil buyer, will likely seize the opportunity to increase its influence.


Trump’s tariffs, far from isolating Venezuela, could end up deepening its dependence on China. The last time Washington imposed sweeping oil sanctions on Venezuela, China stepped in to fill the vacuum. If history repeats itself, Beijing will gain even greater leverage over Venezuela’s energy sector, further diminishing U.S. influence in Latin America.


Venezuela’s oil wealth - 303 billion barrels, the world’s largest - has been both a blessing and a curse. Discovered by foreign firms in the early 20th century, crude made Venezuela the top exporter by the 1920s by supplying oil to a war-ravaged Europe and an industrializing United States. In the 1970s, the industry was nationalized under Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA), a state-run oil giant, PDVSA, thus boosting OPEC influence. However, the 1980s oil crash left Venezuela in debt, forcing an IMF bailout and deepening its economic turmoil.


For India, the path forward is unclear. New Delhi has historically been pragmatic in its energy dealings, resisting American pressure when it suits its interests. It defied U.S. calls to halt Russian oil imports after the Ukraine war, securing lucrative discounts in the process. But Venezuela, unlike Russia, lacks the geopolitical weight to make defiance worthwhile.

Comments


bottom of page