top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Submarines and Sabre-Rattling

Updated: Feb 14, 2025

The USS Alexandria’s docking in Busan has caused Pyongyang to play its familiar game of escalation and brinkmanship.

USS

North Korea is furious following reports that the nuclear-powered American submarine, the USS Alexandria, had made a stop in the South Korean port of Busan last month. The vessel, a Los Angeles-class fast-attack submarine, is not designed to carry nuclear weapons, but its mere presence was enough to elicit a familiar chorus of threats from Pyongyang. The North Korean regime denounced the deployment while warning that it would punish the provokers. The rhetoric, though extreme, is nothing new. The Korean Peninsula has long been trapped in a cycle of military escalation, diplomatic thaw and renewed tensions.


The USS Alexandria’s arrival reinforces America’s military presence in the Indo-Pacific. While North Korea has been Washington’s most volatile irritant in the region, the Pentagon has bigger concerns, not least countering China’s growing assertiveness. The Alexandria’s deployment is as much about bolstering alliances in the region as it is about deterring Pyongyang. The submarine’s visit follows a recent air drill involving a U.S. B-1B bomber - another move North Korea decried as a provocation. To Kim Jong Un, these deployments reaffirm a long-standing belief that the United States seeks regime change in North Korea.


Since taking power in 2011, Kim has sought to solidify his grip on the regime through an aggressive nuclear weapons program. The doctrine was formally codified in 2022 when North Korea announced a law outlining five conditions under which it would use nuclear weapons, including pre-emptive strikes against threats to its leadership. In its latest outburst, Pyongyang cited two such conditions: a direct threat to its nuclear command structure and an attack on critical strategic facilities. The statement is an attempt to justify further advancements in North Korea’s weapons programs under the guise of self-defence. Recent tests of submarine-launched ballistic missiles and sea-launched cruise missiles suggest Kim is intent on expanding his nuclear delivery options.


The tensions also highlight a shift in U.S.-North Korea relations. During Donald Trump’s first presidency, the two leaders engaged in an unusual diplomatic experiment, meeting three times between 2018 and 2019. The encounters produced little beyond photo opportunities and vague promises, but they briefly reduced hostilities. Since then, however, North Korea has returned to its default posture of bellicosity punctuated by missile tests.


For South Korea, the USS Alexandria’s visit is a reminder of the country’s reliance on American security guarantees. President Yoon Suk-yeol has taken a more hawkish approach than his predecessor, Moon Jae-in, who sought to engage Pyongyang with diplomacy. Under Yoon, Seoul has deepened its military cooperation with Washington, participating in more frequent joint drills and enhancing its missile defense systems. North Korea, in turn, has ramped up its threats.


The fundamental problem remains unchanged. North Korea’s nuclear program has become its ultimate bargaining chip. Despite economic sanctions, international isolation and chronic food shortages, Kim Jong Un has little incentive to abandon his weapons. In a world where regimes like Libya’s and Iraq’s fell after giving up their WMD ambitions, Pyongyang sees its arsenal as its only insurance policy. The United States, for its part, refuses to lift sanctions or ease military pressure without concrete denuclearization steps. The result is a stalemate where both sides feel justified in their actions and where every perceived provocation begets another.


Till now, Kim has shown no sign of softening his stance, and Washington has little reason to believe he would honour any commitments, given North Korea’s history of breaking agreements. The alternative is a slow but steady military buildup on both sides. North Korea will continue to brandish its nuclear ambitions, the U.S. will reaffirm its deterrence commitments, and China will watch warily from the sidelines. The Korean Peninsula remains what it has long been - a powder keg, perpetually on the verge of ignition but never quite exploding.

Comments


bottom of page