top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

The Day Cricket Broke Our Hearts

The triumph of Royal Challengers Bangalore came with a price too heavy to cheer.

It was meant to be the fairy tale ending. After 18 years of heartbreak and memes, Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB) had finally lifted the Indian Premier League (IPL) trophy. For their long-suffering supporters, the ubiquitous slogan “Ee sala cup namde” (“this time the cup is ours”) was no longer a punchline, but a jubilant declaration. Bengaluru exploded in celebration. Fireworks burst into the sky, strangers embraced in the streets and a city exhaled years of sporting frustration in one collective breath of victory.

 

But just as that joy reached its crescendo, reality delivered a cruel blow. Eleven fans were killed in a stampede outside the stadium. The night of raucous revelry suddenly became one of gut-wrenching grief as laughter gave way to stunned silence. The same match that delivered sporting ecstasy had extracted a devastating human cost.

 

As the trophy was passed from player to player, and champagne sprayed into the air, television tickers quietly reported the deaths. The images didn’t seem to belong in the same world. Was this a celebration or a mourning? What does one do when the same moment births both triumph and tragedy?

 

Psychologists call this “emotional whiplash” - the paralysing collision of joy and sorrow. Like a computer receiving conflicting commands, the human mind struggles to process contradictory inputs. You do not feel numb because you feel nothing, but because you feel everything, all at once.

 

There is a reason happiness arrives faster. Evolution has wired the brain to respond swiftly to joy. It gives us a quick dose of dopamine, particularly when the reward has been long delayed. For RCB fans, this was not just about a cricket match but about identity, community and redemption. It was tribal - a collective absolution painted in red and gold.

 

Grief, on the other hand, is slow. It creeps and confuses. The news of the stampede didn’t instantly extinguish the glow of victory because tragedy often wears a mask of disbelief. The emotional high of the win clouded the immediate comprehension of loss.

 

The eleven who died were not passive bystanders. They were nothing less than ardent devotees. Fans who had painted their faces, braved chaos and dared discomfort to belong to something larger than themselves. In cricket, we often idolise the athletes, but it is the crowd that fuels the theatre. It is the fans who chant, sweat, hope and get hurt. Their presence is not background noise but the emotional soundscape of the sport.

 

At Sydney Cricket Ground, there is a statue of Yabba, a legendary Australian fan. It is no mere tribute to a man, but to fandom itself - the enduring, often unsung spirit of sport. Why shouldn’t every stadium have such a monument? A reminder that games are not won or lost solely on the pitch, but in the lives of those who fill the stands.

 

The uncomfortable truth of this IPL finale is what psychologists call co-occurrence dissonance - the inability to reconcile joy and grief when they arrive simultaneously. How does one cheer while others are mourning? How do we digest that the same event delivered someone’s happiest day and another’s darkest?

 

After Argentina’s World Cup win in 2022, celebrations in Buenos Aires turned deadly due to crowd surges. Sociologists termed it a “mass elation risk” wherein euphoric crowds ignore safety in pursuit of communal release. The machinery of crowd control is often outpaced by the human hunger for belonging.

 

In such moments, tragedy gets quietly pushed aside. The nation moves on. The media forgets. But grief lingers in the silence. Those who lost loved ones are left to mourn while the rest celebrate. That is why physical memorials matter. Not merely for commemoration, but for acknowledgement. A stand named ‘Fans Forever,’ a plaque or even a statue frozen mid-cheer - these become emotional anchors as public affirmations that those lives mattered.

 

Modern life teaches us to compartmentalise. We put joy in one box and sorrow in another. But reality does not offer such neat divisions. The real task of emotional maturity and of collective responsibility is to hold both truths together. RCB’s win and the eleven deaths are not two different stories. They are two halves of the same match. One is the cheer; the other, the silence that followed.

 

To forget the tragedy is to dishonour the victory. No trophy is worth more than the life of a fan who came to celebrate and never returned home. If we truly care about the game, we must learn to care equally for those who make its glory possible.

 

So next time you are in a stadium, take a moment to look around. Consider what stories lie behind the chants, the banners, the sea of colours. A stand named after fans or a sculpture in the likeness of a supporter may not alter history, but it may remind us to be better stewards of joy. That we must build structures not just for entertainment, but for empathy. Let the game remain glorious. But never forget those whose voices were lost in its thunder.

 

(The writer is a former banker based in Bengaluru. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page