top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

The Emperor’s Enduring Mind

Updated: Mar 12, 2025


Roger Penrose
Roger Penrose

I recently picked up ‘The Impossible Man’ - journalist Patchen Barss’ biography of British mathematical physicist and philosopher Roger Penrose with some anticipation but more wariness. Penrose is, after all, one of the greatest living physicists, second only to Einstein in some respects.

A childhood icon - ‘The Emperor’s New Mind’ disrupted my mind when I was 12 - Penrose is a thinker whose insights into black holes, space-time and the deep structure of reality have left even his most brilliant peers racing to keep up.


As I feared, Barss’ book is not what Penrose deserves. It tells us what kind of man he is, but hardly enough about the ideas that make him singular.

This is not surprising. Penrose has always resisted the easy narratives that biographers crave. Unlike Stephen Hawking, whose ‘A Brief History of Time’ became a cultural phenomenon despite being one of the most unread bestsellers of all time, Penrose never sought to popularize for the sake of mass appeal. Unlike Michio Kaku, whose cheerful speculations about parallel universes and time travel have made him a fixture of science documentaries, Penrose has little interest in playing to the crowd.


His classics like ‘The Road to Reality,’ ‘Fashion, Faith and Fantasy in the New Physics of the Universe’ - are uncompromising works, brimming with deep mathematics and philosophical rigor. They do not pander. They demand.

That is the core of what makes Penrose different. His work is not about selling physics to the public but about understanding reality. And that reality, to Penrose, has always been geometric.


His early breakthroughs were in mathematical physics, where he developed the Penrose diagram - a way of mapping the twisted fabric of space-time around black holes. In 1965, he demonstrated that singularities (points where gravity becomes infinite) are an inevitable consequence of Einstein’s general relativity. Hawking would later extend this work, but it was Penrose who laid the mathematical foundations.


He devised Penrose tilings, non-repeating patterns that cover an infinite plane without gaps. This idea turned out to have deep implications for quasicrystals, materials whose atomic structures mirror these patterns. He even took a toilet-paper manufacturer to court for using his tiling design without permission, arguing that their quilted patterns could, in theory, be infinitely extended without repetition. (He won)


But it is in cosmology that Penrose has been at his most audacious. His Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC), outlined in ‘Cycles of Time,’ suggests that the universe is not a one-time event but an infinite series of “aeons,” where the end of one cosmos seeds the birth of another.

When black holes swallow all the matter in the universe and eventually evaporate, what remains is a sea of photons - particles that do not experience time. It undergoes a conformal transformation, wherein the universe, reduced to massless and timeless photons, is rescaled into a new Big Bang. Penrose claims evidence lies in Cosmic Microwave Background data, recently supported by a team of researchers, though the topic remains controversial.


Mainstream physics leans heavily toward inflationary models, where the early universe underwent a rapid expansion. But Penrose has never been one to follow the pack. His critiques of string theory (beloved by many physicists, including Kaku) are unsparing - dismissing it as a mathematical game, devoid of experimental grounding. Likewise, he has been deeply sceptical of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, which postulates every quantum event spawns an infinite number of parallel universes. To Penrose, this is fantasy, not physics.


It is precisely this independence of thought that makes Penrose indispensable. In a scientific landscape increasingly dominated by theories that prioritize mathematical beauty over empirical testability, he remains a bulwark against intellectual complacency.


(The author is a U.S.-based data scientist)

Comments


bottom of page