top of page

By:

Ashok Rane

27 August 2024 at 10:18:04 am

What Others Could Not Do, Devabhao Accomplished

For the past five years, the issue of Maratha reservation has been a burning topic in progressive Maharashtra. Since August 29, during...

What Others Could Not Do, Devabhao Accomplished

For the past five years, the issue of Maratha reservation has been a burning topic in progressive Maharashtra. Since August 29, during the festive season in Mumbai, the Maratha reservation movement had drawn the attention of the entire nation. Some anti-Maharashtra invisible forces, aiming to tarnish the festive atmosphere, were preparing to exploit the protests at Azad Maidan for political gains. Seeing the unrest among the protesters in Mumbai, there was widespread apprehension across Maharashtra that the state might erupt into chaos. However, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis resolved the long-pending and complex issue of Maratha reservation, which had lingered for forty years, in a just manner without causing injustice to any community. Moreover, during the festive season, he ensured that social harmony and peace prevailed in Maharashtra. For this, Maharashtra will forever remain indebted to Devendra Fadnavis. In truth, Sharad Pawar had a historic opportunity to secure reservations for the Maratha community and pave the way for their progress. When the Mandal Commission was being implemented, the authority to decide which castes should receive reservations rested with the respective state chief ministers. At that time, Sharad Pawar was a prominent leader in Maharashtra. Given his stature, he must have been aware of the deprivation faced by ordinary Marathas and their dire need for development. However, why and how this issue was neglected remains an unsolved mystery. It is clear that Maratha protesters at Azad Maidan were enraged at Sharad Pawar, likely due to this tendency to overlook the community's grievances. On July 13, 2016, a horrific and inhumane incident of assault on a minor girl occurred in Kopardi, Ahmednagar district. In protest against this incident, fifty-eight silent Maratha marches were held across Maharashtra. It was through these silent marches that the issue of Maratha reservation gained prominence, and Manoj Jarange Patil emerged as a leader, with Antarwali Sarati becoming the epicenter of the Maratha reservation movement. The late Annasaheb Patil had also led a movement for Maratha reservation in Mumbai in 1982. On March 22, 1982, he organized a march in Mumbai, and when it became evident that the demand for Maratha reservation would not be met, he sacrificed his life for the cause on March 23, 1982. Considering Maharashtra's social fabric, there was a widespread desire among all communities in the state that the Maratha community should receive a legally sound reservation. Unfortunately, the powerful and wealthy leaders of political parties, including many from the Maratha community, lacked the will to resolve the Maratha reservation issue. As mentioned earlier, Sharad Pawar had several opportunities to address this, but no efforts were made to open the doors of progress through reservations. Instead, leaders like Manohar Joshi and Purushottam Khedekar, or later Devendra Fadnavis and Manoj Jarange Patil, were accused of inciting Maratha youth by fueling caste-based fervor and misleading them. Over the past three decades, Purushottam Khedekar’s organizations have engaged in similar activities. For the last forty to fifty years, Maratha political leadership has kept the reservation issue unresolved, using it as a political tool to keep Maharashtra unstable. This is the harsh reality of the Maratha reservation struggle. When MP Supriya Sule visited Azad Maidan, Maratha youth, chanting that Sharad Pawar had betrayed the Marathas, expressed their anger by throwing bottles at her vehicle, showing the Pawar family their place. As the situation at Azad Maidan grew tense during the festive season, and to prevent any damage to Maharashtra’s social harmony, the composed Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis resolved the hunger strike at Azad Maidan. Without any fanfare, through extensive research and behind-the-scenes efforts, he successfully addressed the Maratha reservation issue, which had been languishing for fifty years. It would not be an exaggeration to say that the entire state of Maharashtra is truly relieved today. By making the right decision at the right time, Devendra Fadnavis also thwarted the plans of those attempting to push Maharashtra into anarchy during the festive season. The Entire Maharashtra is Relieved Since August 29, Manoj Jarange Patil began a hunger strike at Mumbai’s Azad Maidan, pressing for certain demands related to Maratha reservation. Lakhs of protesters from every corner of Maharashtra converged in Mumbai. Due to some inconveniences or alleged mismanagement on the first day, discontent and unrest grew among the protesters. Certain invisible forces sought to exploit this discontent, amplifying it through media and social media. Efforts were made to escalate the Maratha agitation at Azad Maidan, incite riots, and create a vertical divide within Hindu society. Some individuals publicly supported the Maratha movement at Azad Maidan. Leaders like Imtiaz Jaleel of the AIMIM, who opposed the renaming of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj Nagar and glorified the fanatic Aurangzeb, and Abu Azmi, who downplayed Chhatrapati Sambhaji Raje’s sacrifice, visited Azad Maidan to express solidarity with the Maratha reservation movement. An individual named Paigambar Sheikh posted on social media, urging mosques to open for Marathas, attempting to add fuel to the fire. The visits and support from Imtiaz Jaleel and Abu Azmi were seen as attempts to create a divide within Hindu society, particularly among Marathas and other communities, and to trouble the Devendra Fadnavis government. (The writer is a resident of Akola. Views personal.)

The Enduring Allure of Disaster Movies

ree

As we mark the 50th anniversary of ‘The Towering Inferno’ (1974) - an iconic genre-defining film about a mythical, glamorous 135-floor San Francisco skyscraper, touted as the tallest and safest in the world, caught in horrific blaze owing to sub-standard construction. Featuring a star-studded cast that included Paul Newman, Steve McQueen, William Holden, Faye Dunaway and Fred Astaire among others, the film melded stunning special effects with a palpable sense of dread, becoming an archetype of a genre that offered a broad commentary on the fragility of modern life.


In the film, the grand opening of the skyscraper, designed to symbolize progress, devolves into chaos as a fire ignites, trapping hundreds inside.


Newman’s architect and McQueen’s fire chief, coming from different classes of society, become unlikely heroes, embodying the spirit of collaboration essential to overcoming disaster. Their characters reflect a society yearning for unity amidst disarray - a theme that echoes throughout the disaster genre. ‘Inferno’ ends on a sobering note, particularly germane to frequent fires in Mumbai’s high-rises, when the McQueen’s fire chief, remarking on the death toll, wearily tells Newman’s architect: “We were lucky today. The body count was only 200. One of these days 10,000 people are going to die in one of these firetraps.”

Hollywood’s ‘disaster movie’ genre really kicked into high gear in the 1970s with the commercial and critical success of ‘Airport’ (1970) based on Arthur Hailey’s smash bestseller.


‘Airport’ became a foundational disaster film, weaving together the tense stories of passengers and crew grappling with a bomb threat on an international flight amid a snowstorm. The film pioneered a genre defined by high-stakes scenarios, interpersonal drama, and technical suspense, inspiring a wave of disaster movies throughout the decade.


It garnered ten Oscar nominations despite being disdained by lead actor Burt Lancaster as “the worst piece of junk ever made.”


‘The Poseidon Adventure’ (1972) further solidified this trend, showcasing the triumph of the human spirit amidst the chaos of a capsized luxury liner. The film, with an ensemble cast led by Gene Hackman, was another smash box-office success, bringing to the fore an important genre name –producer Irwin Allen, who would later make ‘Inferno.’


The disaster movie craze continued with ‘Earthquake’ (1974) which saw Charlton Heston head an ensemble cast and bringing, with immersive realism amplified by Sensurround technology, the devastating impact of a massive quake hitting Los Angeles.


While critics panned many of these films as pure hokum with scant character development, they illustrated, at a basic level, how ordinary individuals responded to extraordinary challenges. The formula was straightforward yet effective: gather a constellation of A-list stars, introduce a life-threatening scenario, and let the action unfold against a backdrop of impending doom, replete with stunning special effects.

By 1980, the genre was fizzling out with Allen’s grandiose, and progressively sillier projects. His ‘When Time Ran Out’ about a volcano, was an infamous bomb. Critic Leonard Maltin dubbed it “When Ideas Ran Out” or “The Blubbering Inferno.”


This was also the year when Bollywood took its leap into the disaster genre with ‘The Burning Train’ - our homegrown version of ‘The Towering Inferno.’


The sociological aspect behind disaster films is fascinating. They emerged in a period marked by societal upheaval, economic uncertainty and rising consciousness around environmental issues. They provided a cathartic release, allowing audiences to confront their fears in a controlled environment. As viewers, we are invited not only to witness calamity but also to consider our roles within it.


Despite a slump in the 1980s, the genre saw a revival from the mid-1990s with films like ‘Twister’ and ‘Volcano,’ climaxing with ‘Titanic’ (1997) which snared 11 Academy Awards, proving the viability of the disaster movie.


The allure of disaster films endures, tapping into contemporary anxieties like climate change and pandemics. For instance, ‘The Cassandra Crossing’ (1977), a thriller about a plague-stricken train, eerily resonated with the Wuhan lab leak theory, echoing public unease about governmental transparency that resurfaced during COVID-19.


In a way, disaster films provide a cathartic release, a way to process the unpredictability of life by witnessing the worst unfold.

Comments


bottom of page