top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

The Great Indian Reconnection

India’s vision for 2047 can only be fulfilled by inviting its finest minds to stay, lead and shape the nation’s destiny.

As geopolitical winds shift and immigration policies tighten in the West, particularly in the United States, a silent tremor is passing through the hearts of countless Indian professionals, students, and even green card holders. The American Dream, once a beacon for the best and brightest from India, now comes with caveats, restrictions and a growing sense of exclusion. A recently proposed rule in the United States requiring all foreign nationals to register with the government if they intend to stay for more than 30 days has sparked concern not merely for its bureaucratic inconvenience, but for the deeper questions it raises about belonging, dignity and the future.


This rule, still under review, may seem minor in practical terms, but symbolically it could be a tipping point. It signals a shift from a merit-based welcome to a posture of surveillance and differentiation. For many Indian professionals who have lived for decades in the U.S., contributed to its innovation economy, and raised families there, such policies create a sense of being perpetually ‘othered.’ They must repeatedly prove their worth, renew permissions and now potentially report their whereabouts, not because of misconduct but because they are not citizens. Even green card holders once considered secure in their residency are no longer immune to the sense of provisional belonging. This creeping erosion of dignity cannot be ignored especially when weighed against the rising promise of their homeland.


For highly skilled Indians abroad, the question is shifting from what they left behind to what they risk missing. India is no longer the country they emigrated from: it is young, connected, aspirational, and economically vibrant. Its technology sector alone generated $282.6 billion in revenue in FY2025, employing 5.8 million people and creating 126,000 new jobs. Exports reached $224.4 billion, and the domestic market crossed $58.2 billion. India now hosts over 1,750 Global Capability Centres, set to surpass 2,000 by 2030. Its digital public infrastructure - from Aadhaar to UPI - is fast becoming a model for the Global South.


But numbers alone do not tell the full story. What’s changing is the mood. India no longer looks at its diaspora with distant admiration. The Government of India must seize this moment with a focused suite of policies designed to make return not just feasible, but attractive, dignified and fulfilling.


A flagship National Reconnect & Return Program could offer single-window facilitation for returning Indians, covering employment placement, relocation, schooling, housing and legal support. Indian embassies and consulates could host dedicated liaison officers to support return aspirants, while a verified National Registry of Global Indian Experts could match skilled returnees to national missions, research institutes, industry needs and policy think tanks.


India’s academic and research institutions like the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research (IISERs), and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) labs should reserve positions and fast-track lateral-entry appointments for global Indians. Competitive salaries, startup research grants and lab-building funds must be matched with autonomy and clarity. A ‘Global Professors of Practice’ platform can enable returnees to contribute as adjunct faculty or visiting mentors, while a Diaspora Sabbatical Scheme could invite mid-career scientists, technologists and administrators.


In entrepreneurship, too, India’s doors must open wider. Fast-track approvals, repatriation support, and access to public R&D infrastructure should accompany this. India already ranks as the world’s third-largest startup ecosystem with 112 unicorns (as of 2024) and a diaspora-led innovation wave could take this further.


To facilitate global mobility and inclusiveness, India should also introduce a Global Talent Visa Scheme similar to those in the UK, Canada or Australia offering work permits with long-term residency, spousal work rights and easy renewals. A specialized Reverse Brain Drain Visa could apply to Indian citizens returning from abroad with demonstrable experience. Enhanced Overseas Citizen of India (OCI+) status should offer eligibility for grants, government consultancies and leadership roles in public-sector projects. Metros like Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Pune and Ahmedabad could be declared "Technology Magnet Cities," offering world-class infrastructure, SEZ-style incentives and clean transport.


The public sector should tap returning talent through a Technology Reboot Scheme, allowing lateral entry into PSUs, defence tech teams and digital missions. India must also celebrate its returnees through awards like the Deshvaapi Samman and a ‘Come, Build Bharat’ campaign, making them architects of India’s journey to developed-country status by 2047.


These must be accompanied by practical reforms like tax breaks on repatriated earnings, portable pensions and insurance, clarity on double taxation and faster IP protection. These are not concessions, but strategic investments in national capacity.


The emotional calculus of returning is not trivial. It involves uprooting families, navigating uncertainties and letting go of established comforts. But for many, the trade-off is becoming clearer: a life of deferred inclusion abroad versus one of meaningful agency at home. And as India stands poised on the threshold of global leadership, what better time to return than when your country is ready to rise?


A nation’s development is not defined only by GDP or infrastructure, but by its ability to reclaim and re-integrate the dreams of its people. India’s vision for 2047 - a century since Independence - is not just a date but a promise to itself and its citizens worldwide. That promise can only be fulfilled if India invites its finest minds not just to visit, but to stay, lead and shape its destiny.


(The writer is a retired scientist and former Director of the Agharkar Research Institute, Pune and a Visiting Professor at the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay. Views personal)

Comments

bottom of page