top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Plea in HC for fresh polls, new body

Dr. Rumi F. Beramji Mumbai : A senior medical practitioner has knocked on the doors of the Bombay High Court, alleging serious irregularities in the functioning of the Maharashtra Council of Acupuncture (MCA) and challenging the continuation of its current Administrator.   In a petition filed through Advocate Sharad V. Natu, Dr. Laxman Bhimrao Sawant has termed the appointment and prolonged tenure of former MCA Chairman as “illegal and arbitrary,”  and detrimental to the cause of Acupuncture....

Plea in HC for fresh polls, new body

Dr. Rumi F. Beramji Mumbai : A senior medical practitioner has knocked on the doors of the Bombay High Court, alleging serious irregularities in the functioning of the Maharashtra Council of Acupuncture (MCA) and challenging the continuation of its current Administrator.   In a petition filed through Advocate Sharad V. Natu, Dr. Laxman Bhimrao Sawant has termed the appointment and prolonged tenure of former MCA Chairman as “illegal and arbitrary,”  and detrimental to the cause of Acupuncture.   Dr. Beramji, who headed the five-member statutory body 's inaugural term (from May 2018 to May 2023), was subsequently appointed as its Administrator after the council’s term expired.   According to Dr. Sawant’s plea, the Administrator’s appointment was initially meant to be a stop-gap arrangement for one year, and it was ‘extended’ later. However, nearly three years later, the position continues without fresh elections being conducted, raising questions over adherence to statutory norms and principles of governance.   Dr. Sawant has further contended that while Dr. Beramji was installed as Administrator, the remaining members of the council were effectively superseded, leaving the regulatory body without its mandated collective structure, and over 6500-members directionless.   The petition claims that the delay in conducting elections was justified on the grounds of an incomplete voter list, but this reason was flimsy considering the extended time lapse.   The petition, likely to come up for hearing on Tuesday (April 21), also levelled serious allegations regarding the manner in which the MCA has been run under the Administrator. It claims decisions have been taken unilaterally, whimsically and without transparency or institutional accountability.   Besides, Dr. Sawant has made allegations of selective targeting of certain members who have attempted to raise valid issues, including the globally-renowned noted acupuncture expert Dr. P. B. Lohiya of Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar.   Adding to the controversy, a former MCA office-bearer has claimed that over the past three years, approvals were granted to more than a dozen acupuncture colleges in undue haste, purportedly in violation of prescribed norms and alleged shady deals.   These institutions, it is claimed, either exist only on paper or lack essential infrastructure, faculty, and facilities. In addition, around two dozen Continuous Acupuncture Education (CAE) centres were also cleared during this period.   In his multiple prayers to the high court, Dr. Sawant has sought quashing Dr. Beramji’s appointment as MCA Administrator and setting aside all policy decisions taken during his tenure in that capacity in the last three years.   The petition also urged the court to direct the state government to conduct elections to elect and reconstitute a new five-member MCA within two months.   Pending this, the plea seeks an order restraining the Administrator from continuing in office or interfering in the functioning of the MCA or the CAEs in the interest of free and fair elections or the cause of Acupuncture.   Sources within the MCA have described the situation as “deeply concerning,” alleging that individuals of international standing, such as Dr. Lohiya - who has treated prominent personalities like Sachin Tendulkar, the late Manoj Kumar, state and central ministers and other public figures - are being unfairly hounded.   The petition has called for a comprehensive review of all decisions taken during the Administrator’s tenure, a financial audit of the MCA’s financial affairs, and an independent probe by the Medical Education & Drugs Department (MEDD) into the approvals granted to the institutions in recent years.   Despite repeated attempts by  ‘ The Perfect Voice’ , top MCA officials like the Administrator or the Registrar Narayan Nawale, were not available for their comments.

The Misunderstood Chhatrapati

Updated: Mar 3, 2025

Regardless of the merits of the films being made on Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, his legacy deserves its own reckoning.

cahhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj

With ‘Chhava,’ the Vicky Kaushal-starrer based of the late Shivaji Sawant’s acclaimed book crossing the Rs. 500 crore mark globally in less than two weeks, and a raft of films on Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj released last year (among them ‘Dharmarakshak Mahaveer Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj’ and ‘Shivrayancha Chhava’) Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj’s son is firmly in the national consciousness. Yet for much of history, Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj has existed in the margins, a figure eclipsed by the legend of his great father and, later, the rise of the Maratha empire.


History is often cruel to those who come after great men. Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, the son of the great Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, has long been overshadowed by the towering legacy of his father. While the Maratha empire owes its foundation to the latter, it was Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj who took on the mantle in turbulent times, facing enemies both within and outside his fledgling kingdom. If history is to be recast with a fairer lens, it would reveal a ruler of exceptional resilience, a warrior who, though doomed by intrigue and betrayal, waged a ceaseless struggle against the mighty Mughal empire.


To read Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj merely as a tragic figure is to miss the larger drama of his life. His story is not one of squandered potential but of a man who was born into an impossible war and chose to fight rather than bow.


When Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj died in 1680, the kingdom he had carved out of the Deccan was still young, its foundations unsteady. The Marathas were not yet an empire but a confederation of ambitious warlords bound by the sheer will and genius of King’s vision. His death triggered a succession crisis. Chhatrapati Rajaram Maharaj, Shivaji Maharaj’s younger son, was backed by a faction led by his second wife Soyarabai. Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, though the rightful heir as the elder son, executed the plotters and established his authority.


Unlike his father, who had perfected guerrilla warfare against the Mughals, Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj was thrust into the thick of battle almost immediately, inheriting a Maratha state facing an existential crisis. Mughal emperor Aurangzeb had left Delhi to personally lead a massive military campaign in the Deccan. His goal was the complete destruction of the Marathas and the Deccani Sultanates of Bijapur and Golconda. Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, just 23 when he took the throne in 1681, had to fight an empire at the peak of its power.


Yet if Aurangzeb expected an easy conquest, he badly miscalculated. Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj did not merely defend – he attacked. He launched raids deep into Mughal territory, forcing the emperor to divert troops and resources away from his primary campaign. By a twist of fate, the rebellion of Prince Akbar, Aurangzeb’s beloved son was to have fateful consequences for Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj.


The story of Akbar’s rebellion is one of the lesser-known dramas of Mughal history. Disillusioned by his father’s rigid orthodoxy, Akbar, who was sent to subjugate the Rathores during the Rajput revolt of 1679, allied with them.


However, the wily Aurangzeb outmanoeuvred his son, forcing Akbar, along with the valiant Durgadas Rathore, to seek asylum with Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj in the Deccan.


For a brief moment, there was the possibility of a joint Maratha-Rajput-Mughal resistance against the emperor. If this had materialized, Aurangzeb would have faced an insurmountable challenge. Unfortunately, the Marathas, stretched thin by war, could not fully commit to Akbar’s cause. By 1685, the rebel prince had slipped away to Persia, where he would live out his days in exile. Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, however, remained undeterred. His war against the Mughals continued.


His military campaigns, though often overlooked, were remarkable. As detailed by Govind Sakharam Sardesai in his classic ‘New History of the Marathas’ (1946), Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj led successful incursions into the Mughal-held territories of Malwa, plundering Burhanpur in 1681, a move that rattled Aurangzeb’s confidence. He also outmanoeuvred Portuguese forces in Goa and fought the Siddis, ensuring that the Marathas retained their dominance along the Konkan coastline. Had he been given time, he might have further expanded his father’s vision, making the Maratha empire not just a regional power but a dominant force in the subcontinent.


But time was not on his side. In 1689, betrayal led to his capture by the Mughals. The torturous end that followed, days of relentless agony ending in his brutal execution, is among the more horrifying episodes of Indian history. It is also a glorious example of man battling superhuman odds to preserve his faith.


If Aurangzeb expected the Marathas to cower in fear, he miscalculated. As Jadunath Sarkar and G.S. Sardesai observe, Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj’s martyrdom galvanized the Maratha people, who rose as one against Mughal tyranny to avenge their ruler’s death, thus sowing the seeds of an empire that would eventually outlive the Mughals themselves.


The real tragedy of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj is not that he died young, but that history has failed to place him in the pantheon of India’s great rulers. He was not just the son of a great king but a ruler who stood against the most powerful empire of his time and refused to kneel. And in that refusal, he secured his place in history, not as a failure, but as a warrior who never surrendered.

Comments


bottom of page