top of page

By:

Rashmi Kulkarni

23 March 2025 at 2:58:52 pm

Loss Aversion Is Why Your Good Idea Fails

Your upgrade is their loss until you prove otherwise. Last week, Rahul wrote about a simple truth: you’re not inheriting a business, you’re inheriting an equilibrium. This week, I want to talk about the most common reason that equilibrium fights back even when your idea is genuinely sensible. Here it is, in plain language: People don’t oppose improvement. They oppose loss disguised as improvement. When you step into a legacy MSME, most things are still manual, informal, relationship-driven....

Loss Aversion Is Why Your Good Idea Fails

Your upgrade is their loss until you prove otherwise. Last week, Rahul wrote about a simple truth: you’re not inheriting a business, you’re inheriting an equilibrium. This week, I want to talk about the most common reason that equilibrium fights back even when your idea is genuinely sensible. Here it is, in plain language: People don’t oppose improvement. They oppose loss disguised as improvement. When you step into a legacy MSME, most things are still manual, informal, relationship-driven. People have built their own ways of keeping work moving. It’s not perfect, but it’s familiar. When you introduce a new system, a new rule, a new “professional way,” you may be adding order but you’re also removing something  they were using to survive. And humans react more strongly to removals than additions. Behavioral economists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky called this loss aversion where we feel losses more sharply than we feel gains. That’s why your promised “future benefit” struggles to compete with someone’s immediate fear. Which seat are you stepping into? Inherited seat:  People assume you’ll change things quickly to “prove yourself”. They brace for loss even before you speak. Hired seat:  People watch for hidden agendas: “New boss means new rules, new blame.” They protect themselves. Promoted seat:  Your peers worry the old friendship is now replaced by authority. They fear loss of comfort and access. Different seats, same emotion underneath: don’t take away what keeps me safe. Weighing Scale Think of an old kirana shop. The weighing scale may not be fancy, but it’s trusted. The shopkeeper has used it for years. Customers have seen it. Everyone has settled into that comfort. Now imagine someone walks in and says, “We’re upgrading your weighing scale. This is digital. More accurate. More modern.” Sounds good, right? But what does the shopkeeper hear ? “My customers might think the old scale was wrong.” (loss of trust) “I won’t be able to adjust for small realities.” (loss of flexibility) “If the digital scale shows something different, I’ll be accused.” (loss of safety) “This was my shop. Now someone else is deciding.” (loss of control) So even if the new scale is better, the shopkeeper will resist or accept it politely and quietly return to the old one when nobody is watching. That is exactly what happens in companies. Modernisation Pitch Most leaders pitch change like this: “We’ll become world-class.” “We’ll digitize.” “We’ll improve visibility.” “We’ll build a process-driven culture.” But for the listener, these are not benefits. These are threats, because they translate into losses: Visibility can mean exposure . Process can mean loss of discretion . Digitization can mean loss of speed  (at least initially). “Professional” can mean loss of status  for the old guard. So the person across the table is not debating your logic. They’re calculating their losses. Practical Way Watch what happens when you propose something simple like daily reporting. You say: “It’s just 10 minutes. Basic discipline.” They hear: “Daily reporting means daily scrutiny.” “If numbers dip, I will be questioned.” “If I show the truth, it will create conflict.” “If I don’t show the truth, I’ll be accused later.” In their mind, the safest response is: nod, agree, delay. Then you label them “resistant.” But they’re not resisting change. They’re resisting loss . Leader’s Job If you want adoption in an MSME, don’t sell modernization as “upgrade”. Sell it as protection . Instead of: “We need an ERP.” Try: “We need to stop money leakage and order confusion.” Instead of: “We need systems.” Try: “We need fewer customer escalations and less rework.” Instead of: “We need transparency.” Try: “We need fewer surprises at month-end.” This is not manipulation. This is translation. You’re speaking the language the system understands: risk, leakage, blame, customer loss, cash loss, fatigue. Field Test: Rewrite your pitch in loss-prevention language Pick one change you’re pushing this month. Now write two versions: Version A (your current pitch): What you normally say: upgrade, modern, efficiency, best practices. Version B (loss prevention pitch): Use this template: What are we losing today?  (money, time, customers, reputation, peace) Where is the leakage happening?  (handoffs, approvals, rework, vendor delays) What small protection will this change create? (fewer disputes, faster closure, less follow-up) What will not change?  (no layoffs, no humiliation, no sudden policing) What proof will we show in 2 weeks?  (one metric, one visible win) Now do one more important step: For your top 3 stakeholders, write the one loss they think they will face  if your change happens. Don’t argue with it. Just name it. Because once you name the fear, you can design around it. The close If you remember only one thing from this week, remember this: A “good idea” is not enough in a legacy MSME. People need to feel safe adopting it. You don’t have to dilute your standards. You just have to stop selling change like a TED talk and start selling it like a protection plan. Next week, we’ll deal with another invisible force that keeps companies stuck even when they agree with you: the status quo isn’t a baseline. It’s a competitor. (The writer is CEO of PPS Consulting, can be reached at rashmi@ppsconsulting.biz )

The Script of the Soul: Why Handwriting Still Matters in a Digital Age

Even as the digital age diminishes penmanship, handwriting remains a symphony of manual dexterity, emotional depth, and cognitive harmony, where the hand, the heart, and the mind create together.

In an era defined by the rapid-fire cadence of keyboards and the constant glow of digital screens, the intimate habit of writing by hand is quietly receding into the shadows of daily life. Yet, handwriting is far more than a mere record of words; it is a profound, creative, psychological, and spiritual odyssey that connects the mind, the heart, and the human touch in a way no digital medium ever can.


True penmanship represents the sacred trinity of the three ‘H’s: Hand, Heart, and Head. It is a symphony where manual dexterity, emotional depth, and cognitive focus converge in perfect harmony to sculpt, express, and reveal the very essence of human personality.


Penmanship is, in essence, a form of Sadhana—a disciplined and mindful practice that nurtures both inner calm and outer expression. It is a source of joy, a conduit for tranquillity, and a gentle bridge to self-dialogue and self-awareness. This “Aksar-Sadhana” (The Discipline of Letters) must be cultivated with conscious intent, patience, and respect for the written form.


Driven by this conviction, a dedicated movement to preserve and promote handwriting has flourished for the past 27 years, inspiring individuals across age groups and backgrounds. At its core lies a simple yet profound plea: everyone must write by hand, not occasionally, but regularly and with purpose. It was this powerful vision that pioneered the tradition of celebrating January 23rd as World Handwriting Day, reminding society of the timeless value of pen and paper in an increasingly digital world.


Beyond Aesthetics

From the vibrant corridors of schools and colleges to the sombre confines of prisons, the journey of teaching penmanship has been deeply revelatory and profoundly transformative. It has shown how a simple act like writing can become a tool for personal reform and inner discipline. Guided by the traditional wisdom—“Brahmane Balbodh Akshar, Ghadisuni Karave Sundar” (One must strive to craft letters as clear and beautiful as the Balbodh script)—this service continues tirelessly, rooted in both cultural heritage and educational purpose.


Improving one’s handwriting does not merely enhance visual beauty or aesthetic appeal; it instills cognitive discipline, nurtures patience, sharpens concentration, and steadily bolsters self-confidence.


The Mirror of the Mind

The nexus between handwriting and personality remains a vital and fascinating field of study, offering deep insights into the human psyche. A definitive example of this was the initiative conducted across Maharashtra’s prisons during the tenure of the then Director General of Police (Prisons), Meera Borwankar. While collecting and analysing the scripts of inmates involved in serious offences such as theft and homicide, the visceral connection between their inner state of mind and their written strokes became strikingly evident. This research not only highlighted the psychological depth embedded in handwriting but also reinforced a powerful and enduring maxim: “Shape a Beautiful Script to Shape a Beautiful Mind.”


A Call to Action

Today, leveraging the reach of social media, millions of calligraphy and handwriting enthusiasts have been brought together. On the occasion of World Handwriting Day, a simple yet transformative mission has been launched: "Write at least ten lines by hand every day." The need of the hour is to return to the paper and the pen.


Let us pledge today to embrace the act of writing—to empower an initiative that is silent, positive, and deeply transformative.


(The writer is a resident of Jalgaon. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page