top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 4:29:04 pm

Hostage City

For a city that prides itself on never stopping, Mumbai has been brought to a grinding halt by the stoppage of one of its most indispensable services. The indefinite strike by employees of the Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport (BEST) undertaking has effectively paralysed the city’s bus network, leaving millions of commuters stranded and exposing deep fissures in the management of one of India’s largest urban transport systems. BEST ferries around 25 lakh passengers daily through a...

Hostage City

For a city that prides itself on never stopping, Mumbai has been brought to a grinding halt by the stoppage of one of its most indispensable services. The indefinite strike by employees of the Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport (BEST) undertaking has effectively paralysed the city’s bus network, leaving millions of commuters stranded and exposing deep fissures in the management of one of India’s largest urban transport systems. BEST ferries around 25 lakh passengers daily through a fleet of nearly 2,800 buses. Yet over the past three days, the city has witnessed the near-total collapse of this network. On the first day of the strike, only a few dozen buses operated. By the weekend, not a single BEST-owned or wet-lease bus was on the roads. Local trains, Metro services, taxis and autorickshaws have been forced to absorb the shock and are predictably straining under the burden. The strike may be illegal under the Maharashtra Essential Services Maintenance Act (MESMA), and the industrial court may have ordered employees back to work. Yet laws and court orders cannot substitute for sound governance. When a public utility reaches the point where thousands of workers are willing to risk disciplinary action and legal consequences, it signals a failure that predates the strike itself. The demands raised by the unions are hardly new. Employees have long sought implementation of the Seventh Pay Commission recommendations, settlement of retirement dues, an end to contractualisation and the merger of the BEST budget with that of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. Whether one agrees with every demand is beside the point. What is striking is that these issues have been allowed to fester for years without a credible roadmap for resolution. Equally troubling is the government’s reactive approach. Ministers and officials rushed into negotiations only after services collapsed and public inconvenience reached intolerable levels. Such crisis management has become a familiar feature of governance. The unions, too, must recognise the wider consequences of their actions. Public transport is the bloodstream of a city. Every day the strike continues, daily wage earners lose income and ordinary citizens bear higher travel costs. The disruption disproportionately hurts those who can least afford alternatives. Holding Mumbai hostage may attract attention to legitimate grievances, but also risks eroding public sympathy. Mumbai has spent years celebrating new Metro corridors, coastal roads and grand infrastructure projects. Yet the humble bus remains the most affordable and accessible mode of transport for millions. Policymakers often treat BEST as an ageing institution to be managed rather than a vital public service to be strengthened. The increasing reliance on contract workers and wet-lease operations may reduce immediate costs, but also weakens institutional stability and labour relations. A city of Mumbai’s scale cannot afford a public transport system perpetually balanced on the edge of financial distress, labour unrest and administrative uncertainty. Nor can it depend on emergency measures whenever disputes arise.

Tie-Test Treasure

Every cricket lover carries a few scorecards in his heart. Mine, yellowed by time and perfumed by memory, invariably opens to one unforgettable page. It takes me back to September 1986, to the old Chepauk in Madras, where India and Australia produced a Test match that still glows like an oil lamp on a rainy evening.


Not long ago, while watching another India-Australia series unfold, I found myself drifting backwards through the corridors of time. Memory, after all, is a curious batsman. It leaves some deliveries alone and drives a few into immortality.


Kapil Dev and Allan Border were the captains then. Titans in temperament, different in style, yet united by an unyielding spirit. Nobody imagined that the contest would end in a tie, only the second in Test history. Such miracles belonged to fiction.


At the end of the fourth day, Australia, batting a second time, had established a commanding overall lead of 347 runs with five wickets in hand. The newspapers and pundits anticipated a dull conclusion.


On that Monday morning, I wandered near the stadium. A gentleman, whose name I never knew and whose face I have almost forgotten, offered me his Pavilion Terrace ticket for the princely sum of ten rupees. I bought it without much expectation. If nothing else, I told myself, I would enjoy the famous Pavilion Terrace and perhaps catch a closer glimpse of the players.


Little did I know that ten rupees would purchase a lifetime of memories. I entered the ground almost an hour before play. In those days, the final day’s play began thirty minutes earlier. The old rituals of Test cricket had their own charm and dignity.


Then came the first surprise. Allan Border marched his men onto the field right from the first ball. Australia would not bat further. Here was leadership at its finest. Border, hard as Australian granite, had chosen adventure over caution. He invited India to chase and trusted his own bowlers to finish the job.


The game seesawed like monsoon waves in Bay of Bengal. Kapil Dev's earlier century had provided fireworks. Sunil Gavaskar, elegant as ever, contributed a priceless ninety. Dean Jones, battling severe dehydration, had produced one of cricket's bravest double centuries. David Boon and Allan Border had fashioned centuries of their own. Greg Mathews, forever bustling and chirping, spun his web tirelessly.


As shadows lengthened, the match tightened its grip on thousands of anxious hearts. Four runs were needed from the final over.


Ravi Shastri collected three runs from the first three balls. The scores stood level. Last man Maninder Singh had three balls to become a hero.  Then came the moment that still echoes across generations.  Greg Mathews bowled. Maninder defended. Umpire Vikram Raju’s finger rose.


LBW. A tie. Silence, and then pandemonium. History was created.


Had a single run been taken, perhaps the match would have been filed away among hundreds of others. Instead, it entered cricket's folklore, where numbers surrender to emotions. There was no Decision Review System then. In 1986, human judgment stood alone, brave and vulnerable.


Dean Jones, who later said, “A tie is a draw. It means nothing. But it’s everything to us,” captured the paradox perfectly.


Poor Vikram Raju.  For years, the umpire carried the weight of that decision. Maninder Singh maintained that the ball had brushed his bat. Allan Border, fielding close in, considered the verdict debatable. Yet Greg Mathews called Raju “the most courageous umpire on the face of the earth.”


News of Vikram Raju's recent passing at the age of ninety-two brought a wave of melancholy. Time had finally declared innings closed for the man whose raised finger became part of cricket’s eternal tapestry.


Many remember him for one decision. Perhaps we should remember him for something larger. In an age before technology, when umpires stood exposed and solitary, he had the courage to decide.


The heroes of that epic have gradually departed. Dean Jones has gone. Vikram Raju has taken his final walk. Others too have entered the evening of their lives.


Yet that September Monday remains forever young.  And somewhere in my heart, I still offer silent thanks to that unknown gentleman who sold me his Pavilion Terrace ticket for ten rupees.  He probably thought he was parting with a piece of paper.  Little did he know that he was handing over a passport to immortality. For some investments, one does not calculate returns.  One simply treasures the memories.


(The writer is a retired banker and author. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page