top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

Too Much Content, Too Little Craft

In the age of user-generated content, Indian automotive brands must rediscover the craft of storytelling amid a sea of visual noise.

By 2026, India’s automotive brands are producing more visual content than at any point in their history. Scroll through social-media feeds and one encounters an endless stream of gleaming SUVs tackling Himalayan passes, hatchbacks threading through monsoon traffic, and owners proudly posing beside their new machines. Launch calendars are crowded. Marketing pipelines rarely rest. User-generated content (UGC) pours in from every corner of the country.

 

On the surface this abundance looks like progress. Engagement numbers are strong. Real owners are visible. Brands appear present in everyday life rather than confined to glossy advertisements. In a market where purchase decisions are often shaped by peer opinion as much as by engineering specifications, the rise of UGC seems both natural and welcome.

 

But beneath the sheer volume lies a growing problem. While automotive brands have embraced participation, many have diluted coherence. The result is a visual ecosystem rich in quantity, but increasingly inconsistent in quality, tone and intent. Faked authenticity has been prioritized and often at the cost of craft, clarity, and brand memory. Visual storytelling, once shaped by deliberate craft, has become fragmented.

 

The next phase of automotive storytelling in India will not be about choosing between professional production and user-generated spontaneity. It will be about learning how to shape both.

 

The UGC paradox

User-generated content has undeniably transformed automotive communication. After all, nothing conveys credibility quite like a real owner describing a long highway drive, or capturing a dusty trail from behind the wheel.

 

In India, this authenticity carries particular weight as buyers often rely heavily on community recommendations.

 

Yet, today, brands are encountering what might be called the ‘UGC paradox’ wherein engagement is high, but recall is weak. Content is abundant, yet visual identity is fragile and coherent storytelling becomes harder to sustain. Over time the brand ceases to speak and instead merely hosts.

 

Part of the problem lies in the relentless pressure to remain visible. Digital platforms reward frequency and algorithms favour those who post constantly. For marketing teams, the temptation to keep feeding the machine is strong.

 

But brands are not algorithms and visibility alone is not communication.

In India’s fiercely competitive automotive market, where mechanical differences between vehicles are narrowing and emotional appeal increasingly shapes purchasing decisions, indiscriminate content production carries real strategic risks.

 

Endless Content

The first is the erosion of premium perception. Even mass-market brands rely on a certain aura of aspiration. When a brand’s feed becomes a chaotic mix of uncurated images and videos, that aura can quietly fade.

 

The second is the loss of visual distinctiveness. When every manufacturer shares the same kinds of owner clips - cars against sunsets, SUVs splashing through puddles, interiors filmed from shaky phones - brands begin to resemble one another.

 

The third risk concerns the most important marketing moment of all: product launches. These are events where companies invest heavily in production, messaging and design. Yet when surrounded by a constant stream of casual content, even these carefully orchestrated narratives struggle to stand out.

 

This is where the older discipline of visual stewardship needs rediscovering.

 

Production houses and visual-communication specialists were once central to automotive storytelling. Their role was not simply to film cars attractively but to translate engineering, aspiration and lifestyle into coherent visual narratives.

 

In the era of UGC, their relevance is returning but in a different form.

The real purpose of great production lies in knowing which moments to elevate and which to leave untouched; understanding how raw material can be refined without losing its authenticity.

 

In a content environment saturated with owner footage and community contributions, curation counts. Someone must decide which user stories genuinely reflect the brand’s character and which do not.  These decisions cannot be made solely through dashboards or engagement graphs.

 

The craft of visual storytelling which is shaped by taste, cultural awareness and production experience remains indispensable. There persists a common suspicion that professional production inevitably undermines authenticity. Many marketers fear that involving specialists will ‘over-script’ reality or sterilise spontaneous moments.

 

Hybrid Approach

In practice the opposite is often true. Modern production is less about control than direction. Rather than replacing real voices, skilled production partners can function as narrative editors. Their role is to translate everyday experiences into stories that carry emotional clarity and visual coherence. A subtle change in framing or a more deliberate rhythm of editing can transform a simple owner clip into something memorable.

 

This matters particularly in India, where visual cues often carry layered cultural meanings. Aspirational imagery, landscape symbolism and everyday lifestyle markers shape how audiences interpret a brand. Finesse, in other words, is not artificial. It is intentional.

 

The most future-ready automotive brands in India will not abandon UGC. They will architect around it. This hybrid approach allows brands to scale authenticity without sacrificing identity.

 

Production houses and visual communication experts play a critical role here in ensuring those voices collectively sound like the brand. Today, the most progressive automotive brands in India will recognize a simple truth that authenticity does not mean absence of craft.

 

As visual noise increases, brands that invest in refinement, coherence and storytelling leadership will stand apart.

 

User voices will remain essential, but without expert stewardship, they risk becoming fleeting moments of noise rather than lasting brand equity. And the role of production houses and visual communication specialists, far from diminishing, is evolving into something far more strategic as guardians of quality in an age of excess.

 

(The writer is founder and creative director at Trip Creative Services, an award-winning communication design house. Views personal.) 


Comments

bottom of page