top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Uncomfortable Truths

Updated: Jan 6, 2025

Elon Musk

Elon Musk, the billionaire technologist and provocateur, has waded into Britain’s fraught debate over ‘grooming gangs’ with a series of blistering posts on X (formerly Twitter). His unvarnished commentary—accusing the government of complicity and calling for the King to dissolve Parliament—has reignited a controversy that was long simmering. Musk’s interventions, though controversial, expose a glaring truth: the British establishment has too often chosen to look the other way, allowing heinous crimes to proliferate unchecked.


The ‘grooming gangs’ is an anodyne euphemism for organized groups, largely composed of men of Pakistani origin, who have sexually exploited underage girls in towns across England. For over a decade, investigative journalists have meticulously documented the scale of abuse and the systemic failures of police and local councils to act. Yet, public acknowledgment of this grim reality has been hesitant and halting, often accompanied by a reflexive concern over accusations of racism.


The facts are harrowing. In Rotherham, Rochdale, and Oldham, victims—many as young as 12—were systematically raped, trafficked and tortured. Reports from survivors detail harrowing tales of neglect by authorities unwilling to confront the ethnic dimensions of the perpetrators for fear of appearing prejudice.


Despite the documented atrocities, liberal commentators and Labour politicians have been conspicuously reluctant to address the root causes of this crisis. Instead, they have often directed their ire at those raising the alarm. Figures like Tommy Robinson and Douglas Murray are routinely dismissed as far-right demagogues or Islamophobic agitators.


Robinson’s own journey illustrates this dynamic. His early activism with the English Defence League (EDL) was marred by extremism and violence, but it also emerged in response to the very grooming scandals the establishment ignored. His central claim—that Britain has turned a blind eye to the exploitation of vulnerable girls—has proven tragically correct.


Commentator and author Douglas Murray has consistently highlighted the failures of multiculturalism in integrating immigrant communities and addressing cultural practices at odds with liberal values. His critiques, while provocative, are grounded in a broader concern for social cohesion and individual rights. Yet, like Robinson, Murray is often caricatured by detractors more interested in discrediting the messenger than engaging with the message.


Labour’s refusal to endorse a national inquiry into grooming gangs, exemplified by safeguarding minister Jess Phillips’s rejection of a Home Office-led investigation in Oldham, has drawn widespread condemnation. Musk’s assertion that Phillips “deserves to be in prison” was undoubtedly hyperbolic, but it reflects the frustration of many who see political expediency trumping justice.


Conservative voices, including Kemi Badenoch, have called for a full inquiry. The lack of accountability has eroded trust in institutions and created fertile ground for far-right narratives to take root.


Musk has pointedly questioned Sir Keir Starmer’s tenure as head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) from 2008 to 2013, alleging that it was under his watch that many of these crimes went unpunished.


Britain’s grooming gangs scandal is a stark reminder of the perils of ideological paralysis. Fearing accusations of racism, many officials chose inaction, allowing abuse to fester. The result has been devastating—not only for the victims but for the social fabric of a nation increasingly divided by identity politics.


A meaningful response must begin with acknowledging uncomfortable truths. This requires political courage to resist the temptation of euphemism and the fear of controversy. Branding critics as ‘racists’ or ‘Islamophobes’ does nothing to address the suffering of victims or prevent future crimes.


Elon Musk’s bombastic interventions may not be the ideal catalyst for such a reckoning, but they have reignited a vital conversation. Britain cannot afford to shy away from this debate any longer. The victims of grooming gangs deserve justice, and the nation deserves leaders willing to confront the truths that make us uncomfortable.

Comments


bottom of page