top of page

By:

Rajendra Joshi

3 December 2024 at 3:50:26 am

Proud moment for Shivaji University researchers

Indian patent for portable sound absorption testing device Kolhapur: Researchers from Shivaji University, Kolhapur, have developed a portable sound absorption testing device that can scientifically assess whether an installed sound system and its acoustic treatment are functioning effectively. The innovation has been granted an Indian patent, marking a first-of-its-kind development in this field, the university said on Thursday. The patented device, named the Portable Sound Absorption Tester,...

Proud moment for Shivaji University researchers

Indian patent for portable sound absorption testing device Kolhapur: Researchers from Shivaji University, Kolhapur, have developed a portable sound absorption testing device that can scientifically assess whether an installed sound system and its acoustic treatment are functioning effectively. The innovation has been granted an Indian patent, marking a first-of-its-kind development in this field, the university said on Thursday. The patented device, named the Portable Sound Absorption Tester, has been developed by senior chemist Dr Kalyanrao Garadkar of Shivaji University, along with Dr Sandeep Sable and Dr Rohant Dhabbe of Jaysingpur College, and Dr Chandrala Jatkar of the D K T E Society’s Textile and Engineering Institute, Ichalkaranji. The device is designed to test the sound absorption capacity of professional acoustic systems used in recording studios, theatres, auditoriums and soundproof chambers. Until now, the effectiveness of such sound-absorbing installations has largely been assessed through experience and trial-and-error after installation. The newly developed portable tester allows for immediate and scientific evaluation of sound absorption performance once the system is installed. Sound-absorbing sheets and panels are widely used in theatres, studios and vocal recording rooms to absorb echo around microphones and create a controlled acoustic environment, enabling cleaner and more professional audio output. The new device can be used to evaluate a wide range of absorbers, including perforated foam, fibre, fabric, membranes, panels and resonant absorbers, helping improve the quality and effectiveness of acoustic materials. Explaining the working of the device, Dr Garadkar said that the human audible frequency range extends from 20 Hz to 20 kHz. The device generates sound waves within this spectrum and projects them onto the acoustic material under test. The sound waves that are not absorbed are detected by a microphone and displayed on the screen in the form of current or voltage readings. This enables users to instantly determine whether the sound absorption system is functioning as intended and make corrective interventions if required. The researchers said the device would also be useful for those engaged in acoustic fabrication and sound absorption research. Apart from being portable and easy to transport, the device is also cost-effective, making it suitable for field applications. The team expressed confidence that it would prove highly useful in the sound system testing sector. Shivaji University’s in-charge Vice-Chancellor Dr Suresh Gosavi and in-charge Pro Vice-Chancellor Dr Jyoti Jadhav congratulated the research team on securing the patent.

Uncomfortable Truths

Updated: Jan 6, 2025

Elon Musk

Elon Musk, the billionaire technologist and provocateur, has waded into Britain’s fraught debate over ‘grooming gangs’ with a series of blistering posts on X (formerly Twitter). His unvarnished commentary—accusing the government of complicity and calling for the King to dissolve Parliament—has reignited a controversy that was long simmering. Musk’s interventions, though controversial, expose a glaring truth: the British establishment has too often chosen to look the other way, allowing heinous crimes to proliferate unchecked.


The ‘grooming gangs’ is an anodyne euphemism for organized groups, largely composed of men of Pakistani origin, who have sexually exploited underage girls in towns across England. For over a decade, investigative journalists have meticulously documented the scale of abuse and the systemic failures of police and local councils to act. Yet, public acknowledgment of this grim reality has been hesitant and halting, often accompanied by a reflexive concern over accusations of racism.


The facts are harrowing. In Rotherham, Rochdale, and Oldham, victims—many as young as 12—were systematically raped, trafficked and tortured. Reports from survivors detail harrowing tales of neglect by authorities unwilling to confront the ethnic dimensions of the perpetrators for fear of appearing prejudice.


Despite the documented atrocities, liberal commentators and Labour politicians have been conspicuously reluctant to address the root causes of this crisis. Instead, they have often directed their ire at those raising the alarm. Figures like Tommy Robinson and Douglas Murray are routinely dismissed as far-right demagogues or Islamophobic agitators.


Robinson’s own journey illustrates this dynamic. His early activism with the English Defence League (EDL) was marred by extremism and violence, but it also emerged in response to the very grooming scandals the establishment ignored. His central claim—that Britain has turned a blind eye to the exploitation of vulnerable girls—has proven tragically correct.


Commentator and author Douglas Murray has consistently highlighted the failures of multiculturalism in integrating immigrant communities and addressing cultural practices at odds with liberal values. His critiques, while provocative, are grounded in a broader concern for social cohesion and individual rights. Yet, like Robinson, Murray is often caricatured by detractors more interested in discrediting the messenger than engaging with the message.


Labour’s refusal to endorse a national inquiry into grooming gangs, exemplified by safeguarding minister Jess Phillips’s rejection of a Home Office-led investigation in Oldham, has drawn widespread condemnation. Musk’s assertion that Phillips “deserves to be in prison” was undoubtedly hyperbolic, but it reflects the frustration of many who see political expediency trumping justice.


Conservative voices, including Kemi Badenoch, have called for a full inquiry. The lack of accountability has eroded trust in institutions and created fertile ground for far-right narratives to take root.


Musk has pointedly questioned Sir Keir Starmer’s tenure as head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) from 2008 to 2013, alleging that it was under his watch that many of these crimes went unpunished.


Britain’s grooming gangs scandal is a stark reminder of the perils of ideological paralysis. Fearing accusations of racism, many officials chose inaction, allowing abuse to fester. The result has been devastating—not only for the victims but for the social fabric of a nation increasingly divided by identity politics.


A meaningful response must begin with acknowledging uncomfortable truths. This requires political courage to resist the temptation of euphemism and the fear of controversy. Branding critics as ‘racists’ or ‘Islamophobes’ does nothing to address the suffering of victims or prevent future crimes.


Elon Musk’s bombastic interventions may not be the ideal catalyst for such a reckoning, but they have reignited a vital conversation. Britain cannot afford to shy away from this debate any longer. The victims of grooming gangs deserve justice, and the nation deserves leaders willing to confront the truths that make us uncomfortable.

Comments


bottom of page