top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same...

Applause for Cricket, Silence for Badminton

Mumbai: When Lakshya Sen walked off the court after the final of the All England Badminton Championships, he carried with him the disappointment of another near miss. The Indian shuttler went down in straight games to Lin Chun-Yi, who created history by becoming the first player from Chinese Taipei to lift the prestigious title. But the story of Lakshya Sen’s defeat is not merely about badminton final. It is also about the contrasting way India celebrates its sporting heroes. Had the same narrative unfolded on a cricket field, the reaction would have been dramatically different. In cricket, even defeat often becomes a story of heroism. A hard-fought loss by the Indian team can dominate television debates, fill newspaper columns and trend across social media for days. A player who narrowly misses a milestone is still hailed for his fighting spirit. The nation rallies around its cricketers not only in victory but also in defeat. The narrative quickly shifts from the result to the effort -- the resilience shown, the fight put up, the promise of future triumph. This emotional investment is one of the reasons cricket enjoys unparalleled popularity in India. It has built a culture where players become household names and their performances, good or bad, become part of the national conversation. Badminton Fights Contrast that with what happens in sports like badminton. Reaching the final of the All England Championships is a monumental achievement. The tournament is widely considered badminton’s equivalent of Wimbledon in prestige and tradition. Only the very best players manage to reach its final stages, and doing it twice speaks volumes about Lakshya Sen’s ability and consistency. Yet the reaction in India remained largely subdued. There were congratulatory posts, some headlines acknowledging the effort and brief discussions among badminton enthusiasts. But the level of national engagement never quite matched the magnitude of the achievement. In a cricketing context, reaching such a stage would have triggered days of celebration and analysis. In badminton, it often becomes just another sports update. Long Wait India’s wait for an All England champion continues. The last Indian to win the title was Pullela Gopichand in 2001. Before him, Prakash Padukone had scripted history in 1980. These victories remain among the most significant milestones in Indian badminton. And yet, unlike cricketing triumphs that are frequently revisited and celebrated, such achievements rarely stay in the mainstream sporting conversation for long. Lakshya Sen’s journey to the final should ideally have been viewed as a continuation of that legacy, a reminder that India still possesses the talent to challenge the world’s best in badminton. Instead, it risks fading quickly from public memory. Visibility Gap The difference ultimately comes down to visibility and cultural investment. Cricket in India is not merely a sport; it is an ecosystem built over decades through media attention, sponsorship, and mass emotional attachment. Individual sports, on the other hand, often rely on momentary bursts of recognition, usually during Olympic years or when a medal is won. But consistent performers like Lakshya Sen rarely receive the sustained spotlight that their achievements deserve. This disparity can also influence the next generation. Young athletes are naturally drawn to sports where success brings recognition, financial stability and national fame. When one sport monopolises the spotlight, others struggle to build similar appeal. Beyond Result Lakshya Sen may have finished runner-up again, but his performance at the All England Championship is a reminder that India continues to produce world-class athletes in disciplines beyond cricket. The real issue is not that cricket receives immense attention -- it deserves the admiration it gets. The concern is that athletes from other sports often do not receive comparable appreciation for achievements that are equally significant in their own arenas. If India aspires to become a truly global sporting nation, its applause must grow broader. Sporting pride cannot remain confined to one field. Because somewhere on a badminton court, an athlete like Lakshya Sen is fighting just as hard for the country’s colours as any cricketer on a packed stadium pitch. The only difference is how loudly the nation chooses to cheer.

US judge denies new trials in case of Indian family frozen to death at Canada border


Jaddish Patel and Vaishaliben Patel, with their children Dharmik, 3, and Vihangi, 11
Jaddish Patel and Vaishaliben Patel, with their children Dharmik, 3, and Vihangi, 11

Four Indian nationals who died from exposure during a blizzard while attempting to cross the Canada-US border in 2022 remain central to a human smuggling case, after a US federal judge on Tuesday rejected requests for new trials from two men convicted in connection with their deaths.


The convicted men, identified as Harshkumar Ramanlal Patel and Steve Anthony Shand, were denied new trials by US District Judge John Tunheim on Tuesday.


The victims were 39-year-old Jagdish Patel, his wife Vaishaliben, who was in her mid-30s, their 11-year-old daughter Vihangi, and 3-year-old son Dharmik. They died on January 19, 2022, after freezing to death during a blizzard.


Their bodies were discovered just north of the Canada-US border, near the Manitoba-Minnesota boundary.


Family from Gujarat was on foot in the blizzardThe family, originally from Dingucha village in Gujarat, had attempted to cross the border on foot in severe weather. Seven other members of their group survived the journey.

Judge Tunheim declined to overturn the guilty verdicts delivered last November against Patel and Shand.


His ruling now allows both men to appeal their convictions to a federal court after they are sentenced on May 7.


Lawyers for both men argued the evidence was insufficient. “But this was not a close case,” Tunheim responded.


The judge concluded there was ample evidence for the jury to convict both Shand and Patel on all four charges. He acknowledged that prosecutors disclosed a previous disciplinary issue involving a testifying border patrol agent late in the trial — which he called concerning — but said it had minimal impact on the case overall.


He also upheld his decision to try both defendants together rather than separately.


Prosecutors told the court that Patel, an Indian national allegedly using the alias “Dirty Harry,” and Shand, a Florida-based American, were part of a sophisticated illegal network helping an increasing number of Indian nationals enter the US.

Comments


bottom of page