top of page

By:

Rajeev Puri

24 October 2024 at 5:11:37 am

The Night the World Stood Still

Far more than an iconic boxing match, ‘Rumble in the Jungle’ was a spectacle of race, politics and redemption that turned Muhammad Ali into a global myth It was October 30th, 1974, and the air in Zaire’s Kinshasa was thick not just with equatorial heat, but with expectation. Under the floodlights of the Stade du 20 Mai, 60,000 spectators roared as two men entered the ring. One was the most feared puncher alive; the other, a poet-warrior who had lost his title, his license, and nearly his...

The Night the World Stood Still

Far more than an iconic boxing match, ‘Rumble in the Jungle’ was a spectacle of race, politics and redemption that turned Muhammad Ali into a global myth It was October 30th, 1974, and the air in Zaire’s Kinshasa was thick not just with equatorial heat, but with expectation. Under the floodlights of the Stade du 20 Mai, 60,000 spectators roared as two men entered the ring. One was the most feared puncher alive; the other, a poet-warrior who had lost his title, his license, and nearly his soul. By dawn, the world had changed. Muhammad Ali, the challenger and underdog, had defeated George Foreman and, in doing so, reclaimed his crown as the greatest boxer - and perhaps the greatest sportsman - of all time. The ‘Rumble in the Jungle’ (as the fight memorably came to be known) was never just a fight. It was a collision of cultures, a spectacle of politics and race played out in the heart of Africa, and a contest of brains against brute strength. For Zaire’s dictator, Mobutu Sese Seko, it was a propaganda opportunity. For Ali, it was a stage to prove that charisma, intelligence, and conviction could overcome raw power. At 32, Ali was widely dismissed. He had spent three years in exile after refusing to serve in the Vietnam War, stripped of his heavyweight title and vilified by the establishment. Across the ring stood George Foreman, 25, unbeaten and terrifying. In the preceding year he had demolished Joe Frazier and Ken Norton - both men who had beaten Ali. Foreman was the embodiment of brute force; Ali, a relic of a bygone era. Boxing experts predicted a massacre. The Las Vegas bookmakers had Foreman winning within three rounds. But Ali was never one to follow a script. In the weeks leading up to the bout, Ali baited his opponent with a mixture of humour and psychology. “Your hands can’t hit what your eyes can’t see,” he taunted. The words would prove prophetic. The fight began in the early hours of the morning to suit American television. As Foreman charged forward, swinging thunderous blows, Ali unveiled his secret weapon: the “rope-a-dope.” He leaned back against the ropes, absorbing punches with his arms and gloves, letting the elasticity of the ring do the work of defence. Each blow sapped Foreman’s strength. By the seventh round, the younger man’s punches had lost their venom. Ali whispered, “Is that all you got, George?” Foreman, exhausted and bewildered, found himself facing an opponent who refused to fall. Then, in the eighth round, Ali sprang from the ropes, launching a blur of combinations. A right-hand landed flush. The invincible Foreman fell, knocked out for the first time in his career. Ali had defied the odds, his critics, and the limits of the human body. For Africa, it was a moment of pride. A black man, derided and dismissed by Western sports writers, had conquered the world from African soil. For black America, it was a symbol of resilience. Ali, once stripped of everything for his beliefs, had reclaimed his glory on his own terms. Culturally, the fight was groundbreaking. Organised by a young promoter named Don King and financed by Mobutu’s regime, it was the first truly global sporting event. An estimated one billion people watched it live on television - an unprecedented audience in 1974. Both fighters earned $5 million each, a fortune at the time. For Mobutu, the spectacle was meant to showcase Zaire as the “beating heart of Africa.” He had poured resources into the event after his earlier cultural festival, ‘Zaire 74’ failed to make waves. Yet, the dictator’s propaganda backfired. The world saw not Zaire’s regime, but Muhammad Ali’s charisma. Ali’s triumph transformed boxing. For years, the heavyweight division had been dominated by brute strength. The Kinshasa fight restored the value of strategy, timing and intellect. Ali’s rope-a-dope became a metaphor for endurance under pressure. Ali was already a civil-rights hero and anti-war icon, a man who refused to fight a war he believed unjust. After Kinshasa, he became a global symbol of black pride and human dignity. Children in Lagos, Chicago and Karachi alike saw in him not just a champion, but a vision of what courage could look like. The fight’s legacy endures in literature and film. Leon Gast’s ‘When We Were Kings,’ which won the 1996 Academy Award for Best Documentary, revived the magic of that night for a new generation. Half a century later, it remains the yardstick against which all great sporting moments are measured. (The author is a political commentator and a global affairs observer. Views personal.)

Voter Reboot

In a state long associated with electoral apathy, Bihar’s first phase of polling in its 2025 Assembly elections has delivered a quiet revolution. A record 64.66 percent turnout across 121 constituencies marks not merely a statistical leap, but a sociopolitical shift. It is 9.3 percentage points higher than the 2024 Lok Sabha election in the same seats, and 8.8 points above the 2020 Assembly polls and is the highest since 2010. But behind this democratic surge lies an unlikely catalyst, which is the Election Commission of India’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls.


The SIR was designed to purge Bihar’s electoral list of ghost voters, duplicates, and long-migrated names. Between the 2024 general election and the 2025 Assembly polls, the state’s rolls shrank by 3.07 million electors, or roughly 4 percent of the total. In the 121 constituencies that went to the polls, 1.53 million names were deleted. On paper, such pruning ought to have dampened turnout. Instead, 2.43 crore voters cast their ballots this time, up from 2.15 crore in 2024. A smaller pool of electors, but a larger pool of actual voters - an arithmetic that defies easy explanation.


One interpretation is statistical: a cleaner roll raises turnout mechanically because non-existent or inactive names no longer dilute the denominator. But the data also suggest something more hopeful. Despite the smaller electorate, the number of people who voted increased by 13 percent from the 2024 figure, roughly matching historical growth trends seen when Bihar’s rolls were expanding more rapidly.


The ECI argued that repeated names, migrant entries and outdated registrations artificially depressed Bihar’s turnout, already among the lowest in India’s major states. Early analyses of draft rolls indicated that most deletions involved voters who had not cast ballots for years. The final turnout figures seem to vindicate that claim.


Yet, scepticism is warranted. The ECI does not release voter-level data, making it impossible to verify who was struck off and who turned out. Civil-society groups caution that such clean-ups can sometimes sweep too broadly, accidentally deleting marginalised or mobile populations like migrant workers, the poor or minority groups whose documentation is patchy. For a state with high out-migration and vast rural mobility, even a small administrative error could amount to thousands of missing voters.


Even then, the increased numbers hint at genuine political re-engagement. This has subtly altered Bihar’s electoral chemistry. The ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA) may gain from higher participation among OBC and upper-caste voters aligned with Nitish Kumar’s development plank. Yet, the Mahagathbandhan led by Tejashwi Yadav, could equally benefit from youth enthusiasm among Dalit, Muslim and Yadav voters.


Whether the SIR has strengthened or skewed Bihar’s democracy will take more than one election to tell. Initial evidence suggests that a leaner roll has made for a livelier electorate. Still, until transparency improves and voter identities are better safeguarded, the triumph of Bihar’s turnout will remain a qualified success.


Comments

bottom of page