top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Warring MVA allies take their fight to Pawar

With the Congress and Shiv Sena-UBT sparring over around 15 seats with threats of even going independent, Sharad Pawar has stepped in to keep the MVA intact

Pawar

Mumbai: Temperatures in Maharashtra are soaring and its not just the mercury that spiraling upwards. Frenetic discussions and arguments among constituents of the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) are raising the heat as the seat sharing arrangement is yet inconclusive. Sharad Pawar, reckoned as the architect of the MVA, has been roped in to quell the controversy with leaders of the Congress and Uddhav Thackeray’s Shiv Sena making urgent visits to the senior leader’s office. With no consensus in sight, Aditya Thackeray met Pawar in an attempt to seek his mediation in breaking the impasse.


The flashpoint, it is said, is over the seats in Vidarbha and Mumbai where neither the Shiv Sena-UBT nor the Congress currently have much of a presence. But traditionally, the area has elected Congress candidates which is the reason the party is refusing to concede those constituencies to the Sena.


Sources say that the state unit of the Congress has urged its party bosses not to give in to the Shiv Sena-UBT’s “unreasonable demands”. The deadlock is reportedly over 15 seats mostly in Vidarbha where both parties want to increase their presence.


The two parties have been putting up a strong stance with neither willing to blink first. If Sanjay Raut irked Congress leader Nana Patole by commenting that the Maharashtra Congress cannot take a decision, Congress leaders sent signals that they wouldn’t hesitate to walk out of the alliance if Uddhav Thackeray doesn’t relent.


While Pawar is working the phone lines with the Congress top brass in Delhi, Vijay Wadettiwar announced that while the impasse continues on “six to seven seats in Vidarbha”, the MVA is intact seat sharing arrangement might be finalised by Tuesday evening. Vidarbha has traditionally been a Congress stronghold and while it may not have a widespread presence there at present, the party is challenging the SS-UBT’s insistence on fielding candidates there.


It is said that prominent constituencies such as Ramtek, Warora and Nagpur South. Similarly, there are a few seats in Mumbai where the Congress feels it stands a better chance than the Shiv Sena-UBT. The Shiv Sena-UBT may give up its claim on certain key seats in Vidarbha which have been held by the Congress for years until a BJP wave swept across this eastern part of Maharashtra that has, for long, experienced neglect and farm distress.


Another flashpoint is believed to be the Bandra East constituency which was won by the Congress’s Zeeshan Siddiqui last time. While Siddiqui has switched over Ajit Pawar’s party, the Congress wants to stake claim to this seat which has a sizeable Muslim population. However, Thackeray’s nephew Varun Sardesai has started increasing his presence in the area with the Sena-UBT demanding that constituency.

Pawar’s meetings with leaders from both parties indicate that the NCP-SP supremo is the one who can play the mediator between the warring factions considering he is believed to be the one who had stitched together the alliance between unlikely partners with contrasting political ideologies. Party sources say that Pawar has spoken to the top bosses of both, the Shiv Sena-UBT and the Congress, underlining the need for the MVA to stay intact.

Comments


bottom of page