top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Washroom without privacy

Advocate’s outcry exposes crumbling infrastructure at police station

Thane: A shocking incident has raised serious questions about the basic safety and dignity of women visiting police stations in Thane. On June 4, Adv. Kanchan Ghanshani visited the Naupada Police Station along with her husband regarding an FIR inquiry, only to face a deeply disturbing experience inside the women’s washroom. The toilet, located inside the so-called "Women’s Safety Cell" of the police station, had no internal lock an appalling lapse in a facility meant to serve as a secure space for female visitors and staff.

 

Rather than fixing the lock, police had posted a humiliating notice outside the washroom, asking visitors to “confirm if someone is inside before pushing the door,” due to the non-functional latch. To make matters worse, a female police personnel not in uniform reportedly pushed open the door while Ghanshani was inside, without warning. She described the intrusion as not only indecent but also a violation of basic privacy and human dignity.

 

“What kind of administration has money for air-conditioned officer cabins, but not for a simple latch on a women’s bathroom door?” asked Ghanshani angrily, pointing to the misplaced priorities of the police department. The episode sparked outrage over how fundamental safety infrastructure for women is ignored even in critical government institutions like police stations.

 

Compounding the safety concerns, Ghanshani also pointed out that the electrical wiring for fans and lights in the station’s public waiting area is dangerously exposed a clear threat during the monsoon season. “It only takes one short circuit for a tragedy to happen,” she warned.

 

Adv. Ghanshani has demanded that senior police officials preferably female officers visit the police station and conduct an on-ground assessment of the facilities. Her immediate demands include:

 

When contacted, Senior Police Inspector Abhay Mahajan of Naupada Police Station stated that the bathroom in question did have a lock, but it required extra force to latch. “After we were made aware of the problem, we have ensured that the lock has now been fixed properly,” he added.

 

“This is not just about me,” Ghanshani emphasized, “It’s about every woman who visits a police station and expects basic respect and safety.” Her experience echoes the concerns of countless women who feel unsafe even in spaces meant to protect them. The incident is a stark reminder that ensuring safety goes beyond policing it starts with sensitivity, dignity, and infrastructure that upholds the rights of every citizen.

 

Comments


bottom of page