top of page

By:

Dr. Abhilash Dawre

19 March 2025 at 10:48:41 pm

Woman dies by suicide

Husband held over alleged dowry harassment, nine-month-old daughter left motherless Ulhasnagar: A 28-year-old highly educated woman allegedly died by suicide at her residence in Ulhasnagar on September 12, following alleged physical and mental harassment by her husband, mother-in-law and grandmother-in-law over dowry, domestic issues and the birth of a daughter, according to a complaint filed by her father. The deceased, identified as Nitya Gaurav Rai, was married to software engineer Gaurav...

Woman dies by suicide

Husband held over alleged dowry harassment, nine-month-old daughter left motherless Ulhasnagar: A 28-year-old highly educated woman allegedly died by suicide at her residence in Ulhasnagar on September 12, following alleged physical and mental harassment by her husband, mother-in-law and grandmother-in-law over dowry, domestic issues and the birth of a daughter, according to a complaint filed by her father. The deceased, identified as Nitya Gaurav Rai, was married to software engineer Gaurav Sanjay Rai in December 2021. Police have registered a case against the husband and two other family members, and Gaurav Rai has been arrested. Their nine-month-old daughter has been left without her mother. According to the complaint, Nitya was an MSc and BEd graduate, while her husband Gaurav is a software engineer. Her father alleged that despite his limited financial means, he had given around Rs 3.75 lakh in cash to Gaurav at the time of marriage, along with household articles and expenses towards the wedding. Nitya’s father alleged that after the marriage, she was repeatedly subjected to harassment over household work and was allegedly pressured to bring additional dowry from her parental home. He further alleged that Nitya’s mother-in-law Madhuri Sanjay Rai and grandmother-in-law Sharda Rai also subjected her to mental and physical harassment. The father further alleged that the situation worsened after Nitya gave birth to a daughter in December 2025. According to him, her grandmother-in-law repeatedly taunted her over the birth of the girl child and allegedly told her that she had increased their troubles by having another child. According to the family, Nitya generally did not disclose the disputes at her matrimonial home to her parents. However, on the night of the incident, she allegedly made a call to her father at around 11.30 pm and told him to come and take her home, stating that otherwise the family members would kill her. Her father said that he asked her what had happened and told her that he would speak to her in-laws. When he subsequently called again, her father-in-law Sanjay Rai allegedly informed him that Nitya had died. Nitya’s father said he then requested her in-laws to immediately take her to a hospital. He has also alleged that his daughter was killed and appealed to the police to investigate the circumstances surrounding her death and ensure justice for his daughter and family.

What has the RSS done for the country?

Jan 25
3 min read

Every Republic Day, anti-RSS groups repeat the claim that RSS swayamsevaks do not respect the tricolour and question why it was not hoisted at the RSS’s Reshimbagh office. Yet, they rarely raise the same question about other religious, cultural organisations or political parties.


A Muslim organisation called Tablighi Jamaat was founded in Mewat, Haryana, with its headquarters at Nizamuddin Markaz in Delhi. Was the tricolour ever hoisted there? Similarly, Shiv Sena’s office, Sena Bhavan, has been near Dadar in Mumbai since around 1975. Was the tricolour hoisted at Sena Bhavan? If so, that is commendable. Then why is this question never raised for either Nizamuddin Markaz or Sena Bhavan?


Before 2002, did political organisations in the country hoist the tricolour at their offices? Why is this question never raised, and why is only the RSS office singled out?

During Republic Day, when house-to-house tricolour yatras are held nationwide, these anti-RSS groups create a media fuss, claiming the tricolour was not hoisted at the RSS headquarters or that swayamsevaks do not respect it—this has become routine. Yet, they stay silent about SIMI, the Popular Front, Indian Mujahideen, or Naxalites.


In reality, RSS swayamsevaks participated individually, not organisationally, in the freedom struggle and honoured the tricolour. In Bihar, they led the hoisting of the flag at the British Secretariat in Patna and the British office in Ramtek. At Srinagar’s Lal Chowk, Murli Manohar Joshi and Narendra Modi honoured the tricolour, even when the then Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde required Z-plus security. They accepted the terrorists’ challenge without security and hoisted the flag. These incidents show the deep respect RSS swayamsevaks had for the tricolour.


Swayamsevak Hoists Tricolour

Questions are raised doubting the RSS’s faith in the tricolour and its patriotism. In reality, an RSS swayamsevak hoisted the tricolour in the presence of Pt. Nehru at the Congress national session.


On December 27–28, 1936, the All-India Congress session was held in Faizpur, attended by leaders from Mahatma Gandhi to Pt. Nehru. The session was to begin with Pt Nehru hoisting the tricolour on a 30-foot flagpole. When the knot jammed and the flag did not unfurl, panic spread. As no one could climb the pole, 16-year-old RSS swayamsevak Kisan Singh Rajput swiftly climbed up, freed the flag, and let it fly. The crowd cheered and praised him.


Kisan Singh then sat near Baburao Vaidya, the Sangh Chalak of Shirpur. Though it was decided to honour him, it did not happen then. Later, when RSS founder Dr Hedgewar learnt of the incident, he honoured Kisan Singh with a silver cup at the Ghule branch of the Sangh. In August 1993, the Maharashtra government also honoured him with a citation.


RSS Swayamsevaks participated widely in the freedom struggle and were active in the 1942 Quit India movement. When it began, they hoisted the tricolour on the British office in Patna, Bihar, even facing bullets and martyrdom.


After the “Chale Jao” movement began in Mumbai, it spread nationwide. On August 11, 1942, it started in Patna, where local youth raised slogans of “Bharat Mata Ki Jai” and “Vande Mataram” and hoisted the tricolour at the British Secretariat. Enraged police resorted to lathi charges and firing, in which six youths attained martyrdom. Devipada Chaudhary and Jagpati Kumar were RSS swayamsevaks.


After independence, a Shaheed Smarak was built in Patna and renovated by the Bihar government in 1997 near the Secretariat to honour these martyrs. Today, a grand and patriotic memorial stands there in their memory.


RSS in Gramgeeta

In the Indian freedom struggle, Congress led the movement, and workers from many organisations, including RSS swayamsevaks, participated. This is recorded in Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj’s Gramgeeta, which highlights the contribution of RSS and other groups. In his life sketch, it is noted that he visited organisations like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, Bharat Seva Dal, and wrestling akharas, giving the call, “Jaga utho balviro, ab tumhari baari hai” (Wake up, young heroes, now it is your turn).


Through his powerful bhajans and nationalist speeches, he added unique energy to the 1942 freedom struggle, especially in the Chimur–Ashti movements. These references highlight the participation of RSS and other organisations. The Quit India Movement saw RSS swayamsevaks taking part individually, not organisationally, in places like Chimur, Ashti, Ramtek, and Nandurbar.


Therefore, claims such as “the tricolour was not hoisted at the RSS office” or “RSS swayamsevaks do not respect the tricolour” are meaningless.


(The writer is a resident of Akola. Views personal.)

1 Comment



Let us debunk this articles propaganda - Every Republic Day, a familiar ritual plays out. Pro-RSS writers publish pieces asking why critics question the RSS's patriotism. Ashok Rane's article in The Perfect Voice is this year's edition of that ritual. It is written with the confidence of a man who assumes his reader has no memory and no access to archives. Let us test that assumption.


Rane opens by asking: why is only the RSS singled out for not hoisting the tricolour? Why not Tablighi Jamaat? Why not Shiv Sena?

This is a clever move. Instead of answering the question about the RSS, he drowns it in other questions. But the reason the RSS gets singled out is not difficult…


Like
bottom of page