top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

Muslims aghast as a Hindu dons CEO’s cap

Mumbai : Sparking intense debate and deep unease among Muslims, the Maharashtra government has appointed a non-Muslim IAS officer as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the State Haj Committee (SHC), just as preparations for the annual Haj pilgrimage get underway.   According to official sources, Manoj Jadhav, a high-ranking IAS officer, is named the new SHC CEO, replacing Shaikh Ibrahim S. Aslam, who demitted office recently.   The appointment is being described by critics as unprecedented...

Muslims aghast as a Hindu dons CEO’s cap

Mumbai : Sparking intense debate and deep unease among Muslims, the Maharashtra government has appointed a non-Muslim IAS officer as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the State Haj Committee (SHC), just as preparations for the annual Haj pilgrimage get underway.   According to official sources, Manoj Jadhav, a high-ranking IAS officer, is named the new SHC CEO, replacing Shaikh Ibrahim S. Aslam, who demitted office recently.   The appointment is being described by critics as unprecedented in the state’s history, even as state government officials maintain that the SHC CEO’s role is administrative in nature.   Unconvinced, community leaders and legal experts point out that the position carries significant religious and operational responsibilities.   India sends around 1.75-lakh Haj pilgrims to Saudi Arabia every year, with a substantial majority coordinated through state and central Haj committees. The CEO is directly involved in overseeing the logistics, accommodation, travel schedules, coordination with Saudi authorities, and compliance with religious requirements associated with the Holy Haj pilgrimage.   Former SHC Chairman (2014-2018) Alhaj Ebrahim Gulam Nabi Shaikh, said the appointment has raised serious questions over its validity. “There is no provision in either the Central or State Haj Committee Acts that explicitly allows or envisages such an appointment. It is shocking how this decision was taken without consulting all stakeholders. Beyond administration, the CEO must address several religious and community-sensitive issues. Many Muslims are genuinely worried about how this will be handled,” he told The Perfect Voice.   Well-known advocate Yusuf Abrahani termed the decision “blatantly illegal” and said it has caused widespread distress. “I am in touch with major Muslim organisations, community leaders, trusts, and clerics across the state. We plan to challenge this appointment in court as early as next week,” he said.   Abrahani further noted that the CEO is traditionally expected to travel to Mecca and Medina, engage with Haj authorities, and possess a working understanding of Haj rites, rituals, and Islamic practices.   “This is far from being merely an organisational job. The question is not personal competence, but institutional appropriateness and legality,” he added.   Muslim intellectual M. Faisal Azmi, whose father, the late Hafiz Naushad Azmi was an ex-SHC Chairman, described the development as ‘absolutely unimaginable’. “It has shaken the entire Muslim community. Senior religious leaders and legal experts are discussing various options to challenge and rectify this,” he said.   “This is purely a matter of faith and religious administration of the Muslim community and cannot be tinkered with casually. It must be examined whether the Haj Committee Act permits such an appointment and under what circumstances. If it does not, the decision is clearly open to legal challenge.” SUHAIL KHANDWANI, Managing Trustee, Haji Ali Dargah & Mahim Dargah   “It is a matter of deep regret. Muslims are being systematically sidelined from key statutory and official bodies. Now even the Maharashtra State Haj Committee has not been spared. The motives may be questionable, but such actions will not succeed in weakening the community’s resolve.” MAULANA MAHMOOD DARYABDI, General Secretary, All India Ulema Council

When Algorithms Decide Your Income: India’s New Tax Reality

By 2026–27, the real conflict in taxation will be between what people declare and what algorithms believe they earn.

India’s tax system is undergoing a quiet yet far-reaching transformation. For decades, taxation revolved around what a taxpayer disclosed and what an assessing officer could confirm through paperwork and manual scrutiny. That framework is steadily being replaced by a technology-led model, where income is no longer just declared but inferred from vast streams of reconstructed digital data. Bank transactions, spending patterns, investments, and online financial behaviour are increasingly shaping how taxable income is determined.


By 2026–27, the central tension in India’s tax landscape is unlikely to be a simple divide between the rich and the poor. Instead, it will be a deeper conflict between human declaration and machine calculation. That is, between what individuals say they earn and what algorithms, powered by data trails, conclude they must be earning.


With the rapid expansion of platforms such as AIS (Annual Information Statement), GSTN, bank reporting systems, UPI, credit card networks, stock exchanges, and even global payment gateways, almost every financial activity now leaves behind a permanent digital trace. From a chartered accountant’s perspective, this marks a fundamental shift. The traditional concept of income derived from books of accounts and financial statements is gradually being replaced by income inferred from behavioural and transactional data. What matters is no longer only what is recorded in ledgers but what is reflected in a person’s real-world financial behaviour. A taxpayer’s spending, investing, borrowing, saving, and earning patterns are now continuously captured, analysed, and cross-verified against what is declared in the income-tax return.


For instance, if an individual reports an annual income of Rs 8 lakh but services EMIs of Rs 1.5 lakh. Then they spend around Rs 35,000 every month on credit cards and invest regularly in shares and mutual funds. They also pay rent, school fees, and insurance premiums; the system will infer that the declared income does not support such a lifestyle.


This is no longer a question of subjective suspicion or selective investigation by an officer; it becomes a question of mathematical inconsistency within the data itself. The algorithms will automatically flag such mismatches, generate risk scores, and trigger alerts or notices without human intervention. In effect, income tax is steadily evolving into a form of lifestyle-based taxation, where the way one lives financially becomes as important as the income one claims to earn.


Impact On Taxpayers

This shift will impact not only wealthy individuals but also millions of middle-class taxpayers, freelancers, digital creators, small traders, and independent professionals.


Today, a growing number of people earn through YouTube, Instagram, online marketplaces, foreign freelance platforms, stock trading, affiliate marketing, and various side businesses, but these incomes are not always reported completely or consistently. In the past, such fragmented and digital sources of income were difficult for tax authorities to identify and track with accuracy.


By 2026, however, most of these income streams will become fully visible and easily traceable through bank credits, mandatory platform reporting, payment gateway records, and international remittance data.


From a CA’s perspective, this creates both a serious challenge and a much larger professional responsibility. The role of the profession is steadily shifting away from simple return filing toward detailed financial data reconciliation and interpretation. Chartered accountants will increasingly be required to explain why a large bank credit does not constitute taxable income. Or why a particular transfer is actually a loan or a capital receipt, or why a family transaction is exempt or non-taxable. And how business cash flows logically align with the profits reported in the accounts. Clients, therefore, will no longer need only traditional tax planning and compliance support.


Data Mismatch

The biggest danger for taxpayers will not be tax rates but data mismatches. A person may be honest but careless in classifying income or informal in financial dealings. The new system will not understand intentions; it will only see numbers. Any inconsistency between spending and declared income can trigger scrutiny.


Simultaneously, this data-driven approach will reduce corruption and arbitrary harassment. Decisions will be algorithm-based, not officer-based. However, it also means there will be very little room for errors, delays, or informal practices.


The message for 2026–27 is clear: the safest tax strategy will not be hiding income but aligning income with financial reality.


For chartered accountants, the role will evolve from compliance professionals to financial interpreters of digital lives. In this new tax war, those whose data tells a different story than their returns will be on the front line — and only proper financial reporting will be their protection.


(The writer is a Chartered Accountant based in Thane. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page