top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

When Mercy Begets Mayhem

Mercy Begets Mayhem
Candles flowers and wreaths sit in front of the entrance to St. John's Church in Magdeburg, Germany early Sunday.

The festive spirit in Magdeburg’s Christmas market turned into chaos on Friday evening as a 50-year-old man rammed his car into the bustling crowd, killing five people and injuring over 200. Among the victims were seven Indian nationals, underlining the international scope of this calamity.


The suspect, identified as Taleb A., a Saudi-born psychiatrist, has a troubling past. Wanted by Saudi Arabia on terrorism and human trafficking charges, he was granted asylum in Germany despite repeated extradition requests. German authorities’ decision to harbour Taleb, who later weaponized this sanctuary against his hosts, has drawn condemnation not just domestically but also globally. Tech mogul Elon Musk, in a searing critique, labelled Germany’s refusal to extradite Taleb as “insane” and called for severe consequences for those responsible.


This attack revives haunting memories of the 2016 Berlin Christmas market tragedy, where Anis Amri, a Tunisian asylum seeker, drove a truck into a crowd, killing 13 and injuring dozens. Amri had exploited Germany’s asylum system, despite being flagged as a security risk and ordered deported. He had slipped through the cracks of an overstretched bureaucracy, a failure emblematic of the systemic challenges Germany faces in managing migration and security.


Other incidents further underscore the troubling pattern. In 2020, a Syrian asylum seeker launched a knife attack in Dresden, killing one man and severely injuring another. In 2019, an Eritrean refugee pushed a mother and her child onto train tracks in Frankfurt, killing the child. Each of these events had stoked public anger, exposing the absurdities in Germany’s asylum policies.


At the heart of this crisis lies Germany’s liberal immigration policy, a legacy of former Chancellor Angela Merkel. Merkel’s 2015 decision to welcome over a million refugees was heralded globally as a ‘humanitarian triumph’ but has since become a lightning rod for criticism. While the policy was driven by a sense of moral obligation rooted in Germany’s post-World War II commitment to human rights, its implementation revealed glaring flaws. Social integration lagged, local infrastructure buckled under pressure, and public safety concerns mounted.


Eastern Germany, where Magdeburg is located, has been particularly vocal in its opposition to Merkel’s policies. The region has seen a surge in support for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which has adeptly exploited anxieties over immigration and cultural identity. The AfD’s rhetoric resonates with a populace disillusioned by what they perceive as an elite political class out of touch with their daily realities.


The political fallout from the Magdeburg attack is already palpable. Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s fragile coalition government collapsed recently after a confidence vote, plunging Germany into a political quagmire. With elections slated for February 2025, the AfD’s anti-immigration platform is gaining traction, threatening to reshape Germany’s political landscape.


Germany’s struggle mirrors a broader European dilemma. The 2016 Brussels bombings and the 2015 Paris attacks revealed similar vulnerabilities in European asylum and immigration systems. In each case, attackers exploited lax oversight to carry out atrocities. These incidents have prompted countries like France, Belgium and Austria to tighten their immigration laws and increase surveillance. However, Germany’s unique historical burden as a nation striving to atone for its past has made such measures politically fraught.


The Magdeburg attack raises uncomfortable questions about integration. Taleb A., described as a “former Muslim,” had a history of posting anti-Islamic sentiments online.


As Germany mourns the dead and tends to the injured, policymakers must address the systemic flaws that allow individuals like Taleb A. to exploit the asylum system. The decisions Germany makes in the coming months will not only shape its future but serve as a bellwether for Europe’s handling of migration.

Comments


bottom of page