top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Wings of Deterrence

Manila’s billion-dollar fighter jet purchase signals a new chapter in US’ security strategy amid China’s maritime assertiveness.

The United States’ decision to approve the sale of 20 F-16 fighter jets to the Philippines, valued at $5.58 billion marks a defining moment in the evolving security architecture of the Indo-Pacific. Manila, long reliant on outdated hardware and a weak deterrence posture, is finally embracing a stronger air force capable of countering Chinese aggression in the South China Sea and preparing for contingencies in Taiwan’s defence.


The deal signals Washington’s determination to bolster its oldest ally in Asia against Beijing’s growing assertiveness. More tellingly, it coincides with urgent calls from the Filipino military leadership to prepare for a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan.


Alongside these jets comes an arsenal of guided bombs, Sidewinder missiles, and radar systems that will modernize the Philippine Air Force (PAF). The State Department justified the sale on strategic grounds, citing Manila’s role in maintaining regional stability. The message seems to be that Washington wants a more capable Philippines to deter Chinese aggression - both in the South China Sea and, potentially, in Taiwan’s defence.


The U.S.-Philippines alliance, forged in the crucible of the Second World War and strengthened during the Cold War, has always been strategic. Throughout the 20th century, Washington viewed the Philippines as a crucial foothold in the Pacific, hosting major U.S. military bases at Clark and Subic Bay until nationalist sentiment forced their closure in the 1990s. Yet, even after their departure, security cooperation endured, driven first by counterterrorism efforts in the post-9/11 era and now by shared concerns over China’s regional ambitions.


This latest weapons deal is part of a broader realignment. Under President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., Manila has sought deeper security ties with Washington, reversing his predecessor Rodrigo Duterte’s flirtation with Beijing. Recent years have seen joint U.S.-Philippines military exercises expand, new defence pacts signed, and even discussions about granting U.S. forces rotational access to key Philippine bases. The return of F-16s to the archipelago after decades of reliance on aging South Korean FA-50 fighters suggests the Philippines is once again embracing its role as a frontline U.S. ally.


For Beijing, the F-16 sale represents a provocation. China has spent years tightening its grip over the South China Sea, transforming reefs into militarized islands and deploying coast guard and naval forces to intimidate rival claimants, including the Philippines.


Confrontations have escalated, from water cannon skirmishes near Second Thomas Shoal to shadowing of Philippine naval vessels. The acquisition of F-16s enhances Manila’s ability to contest these waters, particularly with improved maritime domain awareness and enemy air defence suppression capabilities.


Yet, the bigger geopolitical shift may lie beyond the South China Sea. General Romeo Brawner, the Filipino military chief, has urged his forces to prepare for a Chinese attack on Taiwan, a scenario that would almost certainly draw in the United States. The Philippines’ proximity to Taiwan makes it a critical player in any conflict, serving as a potential launching pad for U.S. military operations.


For all its strategic merit, the F-16 deal does not instantly transform the Philippines into a military heavyweight. The country still lacks the naval and air defence infrastructure to fully utilize such advanced fighters. Its fleet is small, its air force underfunded, and its military stretched thin by insurgencies in the south. The transition to F-16s will take time, and without sustained investment in training, logistics, and operational readiness, Manila risks acquiring high-tech weapons without the means to deploy them effectively.


Nonetheless, this sale sends a message that the era of American complacency in Southeast Asia is over. Washington has learned from the failures of the past decade, when China’s rapid militarization of the South China Sea was met with little resistance. By reinforcing Manila, the U.S. is redrawing the military balance of the Indo-Pacific. The next time Chinese ships test Philippine resolve, they may find a more formidable force staring back.

Comments


bottom of page