top of page

By:

Abhijit Mulye

21 August 2024 at 4:59:11 pm

MLC polls expose cracks in Mahayuti, MVA

AI Generated Image Mumbai: The upcoming Maharashtra Legislative Council (MLC) elections for the graduate and teacher constituencies have laid bare the deep-seated fissures within both the ruling Mahayuti and the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) alliances. In a significant development that could have far-reaching political implications, multiple rebel candidates, including prominent figures with strong party affiliations, have defied alliance dictates to file their nominations as...

MLC polls expose cracks in Mahayuti, MVA

AI Generated Image Mumbai: The upcoming Maharashtra Legislative Council (MLC) elections for the graduate and teacher constituencies have laid bare the deep-seated fissures within both the ruling Mahayuti and the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) alliances. In a significant development that could have far-reaching political implications, multiple rebel candidates, including prominent figures with strong party affiliations, have defied alliance dictates to file their nominations as independents, setting the stage for high-stakes, multi-cornered contests. Mahayuti Turmoil The Mahayuti alliance, comprising the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena, and the Ajit Pawar-led Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), is grappling with rebellion on multiple fronts. In the critical Nagpur Graduates constituency, a traditional BJP stronghold, former BJP MLC and Nagpur Mayor Anil Sole has thrown a spanner in the works by filing his nomination as an independent candidate. This move directly challenges the official BJP candidate, Sudhakar Kohale. While the BJP leadership, including state president Ravindra Chavan, has attempted to downplay the situation, asserting that Sole has been "pacified," the former MLC's actions tell a different story. Sole's decision to contest independently is particularly significant given his long-standing association with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and his previous stint as a BJP MLC from the very same constituency. The situation is equally complicated in the Amravati Teachers constituency. The Shiv Sena (Shinde faction) has officially fielded Kiran Sarnaik. However, adding to the confusion, Sangita Shinde, sister of BJP MP Anil Bonde, has also entered the fray, potentially splitting the Mahayuti vote. The opposition MVA is also facing its share of internal discord here. While the Congress has nominated Aditi Pohre, daughter of former minister Harshvardhan Deshmukh, the Shiv Sena (UBT) has fielded Dattatray Lahane. The presence of numerous candidates representing various teachers' organizations further complicates the electoral arithmetic in this constituency. Opposition Rebellion The Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar Graduates constituency has witnessed another surprise development. While the NCP's sitting MLC, Satish Chavan, was widely considered the frontrunner, the BJP's M.K. Deshmukh has unexpectedly filed his nomination as a rebel candidate, catching the Mahayuti leadership completely off guard. The MVA, too, is facing rebellion in this constituency. Although the seat was officially allocated to the NCP (Sharad Pawar faction), Shiv Sena (UBT)'s Dilip Ghuge has also filed his nomination, causing significant heartburn within the opposition alliance. The Pune constituencies present a microcosm of the larger alliance troubles. In the Pune Graduates constituency, the BJP has fielded Dr. Smita Jadhav, the daughter-in-law of Pratap Singh Jadhav, owner of the 'Pudhari' news group and niece of Congress leader Satej Patil. Adding intrigue to this contest is the fact that she is contesting against Harshada Deshmukh-Jadhav, the official candidate of the NCP (Sharad Pawar faction). However, the real drama is unfolding in the Pune Teachers constituency. The BJP's official candidate, Koustubh Gawde, is facing a formidable challenge from Mangesh Chiwate, a close confidant of Chief Minister Eknath Shinde. Chiwate, a former journalist who handled the CM's medical aid cell while Shinde was the CM, has claimed that his party leadership has provided him with the crucial 'AB' form, signaling official backing. Commenting on the chaotic situation, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis acknowledged that seat-sharing talks remained inconclusive in some areas but expressed hope that the alliance partners would eventually reach an agreement. The true picture of the electoral battlefield will only emerge after Friday, October 9th, the last date for the withdrawal of nominations. Until then, both alliances will be working overtime to contain the rebellions and present a united front, but the deep cracks exposed by these developments suggest that the upcoming MLC elections will be fiercely contested and highly unpredictable.

A Landmark Step in Medical Waste Regulation

Jul 4, 2025
2 min read

The 1998 rules marked India’s first serious attempt to regulate biomedical waste, laying the groundwork for safer healthcare waste management nationwide.

The Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998, were originally published on 27 July 1998 by the then Ministry of Environment and Forests (now the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change—MoEF&CC), Government of India. These rules were issued under the powers conferred by the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, to establish a regulatory framework for the management of biomedical waste generated across the country.


These rules have been amended on several occasions, most notably in 2000, 2003, and 2016. The amendments in 2000 and 2003 aimed to address implementation gaps identified during the early years of enforcement.


The first amendment, introduced in 2000, formally established the role of prescribed authorities such as the State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) and Pollution Control Committees (PCCs), making them responsible for enforcing the rules within their respective states and union territories. Additionally, municipal corporations, municipalities, or urban and local bodies were tasked with identifying and providing suitable sites for the common disposal or incineration of biomedical waste, both within their jurisdiction and in areas not covered by any municipal body.


Responsibility for arranging appropriate disposal sites was assigned to either the occupiers generating biomedical waste or operators of common biomedical waste treatment facilities (CBWTFs), either independently or in collaboration with others. The local municipal body was also held responsible for making land available to CBWTF operators and for collecting segregated biomedical waste from hospitals and transporting it to treatment and disposal facilities.


Subsequently, the Central Government undertook a comprehensive review of the existing rules with the aim of ensuring more effective implementation and enhancing the entire waste management process—including collection, segregation, processing, treatment, and disposal—in an environmentally sound manner. This review also sought to reduce the negative environmental impact of biomedical waste.


Draft rules were published on 3 June 2015, inviting objections and suggestions from the public within sixty days of publication in the Gazette of India. All feedback received during this consultation period was carefully reviewed and considered.


As a result, the Central Government, exercising its authority under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, notified the Bio-Medical Waste Management Rules, 2016, which came into effect on 28 March 2016, thereby superseding the 1998 rules.


The 2016 rules brought about significant changes—expanding coverage, simplifying waste categorisation, and improving disposal methods. Under the 1998 framework, biomedical waste was divided into multiple categories, with waste from different categories being disposed of in four colour-coded bags. This approach often led to confusion among housekeeping and healthcare staff responsible for waste handling, sorting, and storage.


In contrast, the 2016 rules consolidated the system by classifying biomedical waste into just four clear categories, thereby eliminating confusion and making segregation and management more straightforward for healthcare facilities.


I’ll delve deeper into the specific provisions of the Bio-Medical Waste Management Rules 2016 in my next article. Until then, have a pleasant weekend!


(The writer is an environmentalist.)

Comments


bottom of page