top of page

By:

Anuradha Rao

3 March 2025 at 9:18:19 pm

The Problem with One-Face Politics

From Kanhaiya Kumar to Arvind Kejriwal, Indian politics offers a warning about movements that struggle to grow beyond one dominant face. Watching Abhijeet Dipke rise to prominence recently made me think of Kanhaiya Kumar. Not necessarily because of their politics, but because of a pattern. Kanhaiya did not emerge alone. During the JNU agitation of 2016, Umar Khalid, Shehla Rashid and Anirban Bhattacharya were also prominent voices. Yet one person became the most recognisable electoral...

The Problem with One-Face Politics

From Kanhaiya Kumar to Arvind Kejriwal, Indian politics offers a warning about movements that struggle to grow beyond one dominant face. Watching Abhijeet Dipke rise to prominence recently made me think of Kanhaiya Kumar. Not necessarily because of their politics, but because of a pattern. Kanhaiya did not emerge alone. During the JNU agitation of 2016, Umar Khalid, Shehla Rashid and Anirban Bhattacharya were also prominent voices. Yet one person became the most recognisable electoral political face of that moment. Dipke, too, is part of a movement with other articulate people around him. Yet increasingly, one name travels. That raises three questions for any movement or political party hoping to become a serious electoral alternative. Can the party nurture more than one face? Can those faces make big ideas understandable? Can one of them eventually take over? Similar Patterns Irom Sharmila moved from extraordinary moral authority as an activist into electoral politics, but that authority did not translate into votes. Jaya Prakash Narayan built Lok Satta around governance reform and institutional change, but strong ideas did not translate into large-scale electoral strength. Akhil Gogoi moved from grassroots activism into Raijor Dal and built an electoral presence, but the organisation remains strongly identified with him. Chandrashekhar Azad moved from the Bhim Army to the Azad Samaj Party and then into Parliament. His next test is whether the organisation can grow beyond his own appeal. Then, there is Arvind Kejriwal. India Against Corruption had several formidable names around it: Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, Yogendra Yadav, Prashant Bhushan, Kumar Vishwas and others. Yet over time, AAP became overwhelmingly identified with Kejriwal. Politics naturally seeks a protagonist. Charisma, timing and communication matter immensely, as does media attention. The problem arises when the organisation stops looking beyond that face. What happens to the second, third and fourth people? Are they given responsibility? Are they allowed to build their own constituencies? Are they exposed to the public often enough to become independently recognisable? Or does the success of one leader quietly become the ceiling for everyone else? Perhaps, it is far too early to ask this question of Dipke. Perhaps it is too early to ask whether he has a succession plan. We do not yet know clearly whether he even sees his movement becoming a conventional political party, or what shape he ultimately wants it to take. But it is not too early to ask what happens to the talent around him. Succession is a late-stage question. Talent visibility is an early-stage one. A movement reveals something about its future long before it contests an election: through whom it allows to speak, whom it trusts with responsibility, and whether others around the founder are allowed to build their own identities. Succession Woes This is hardly limited to politics. Indian organisations have struggled with the same issue for years. Family-run businesses have a clear succession path. Whether the next generation is always the best choice is another matter, but the direction is obvious. Outside family businesses, the problem is often more glaring. Companies speak endlessly about leadership pipelines, high-potential talent and succession planning. Yet when a long-serving chief executive or founder leaves, boards often find that nobody inside is ready. Was there really no talent, or did the organisation fail to recognise, retain, stretch and give it enough room to grow? That question matters even more today because what we once recognised as talent may no longer be enough. The skills that made someone successful ten years ago may not be the skills needed for the next decade. Politics faces the same problem. Recognising talent is only the beginning. The second challenge is whether that talent can communicate. Yogendra Yadav is a useful example. Few would question his understanding of Indian politics, elections, rural India, or public policy. He brings nuance to issues that deserve it. But nuance has a difficult relationship with electoral politics. A voter should not need a seminar to understand what you are proposing. That does not mean dumbing down ideas. India will need serious thinking on artificial intelligence, jobs, education, agriculture, climate, cities and demographic change. Political leaders will need intellectual depth. But depth must be translated. The real skill is making something simple without making it simplistic. A leader must understand the ten-year problem and explain its relevance in ten seconds. Politics needs intellectual depth in the engine room and clarity on the dashboard. Perhaps this is why one person sometimes races ahead of equally intelligent colleagues. The political star may not be the person with the most sophisticated argument. It may be the person who can make that argument understandable beyond the room. Then comes the third question: can one of them eventually take over? Congress has spent decades responding to criticism that leadership succession repeatedly returns to one family. The BJP faces a very different situation. After more than a decade of Narendra Modi dominating national politics, discussion of who will follow him remains largely speculative. When does a party start preparing for what comes next? Certainly not when the chair becomes vacant. Future leaders need years of preparation before the public. They need to govern, campaign, debate, explain difficult ideas, face criticism, make mistakes, lose occasionally and recover. More importantly, several people need that opportunity. Succession planning should not mean identifying a single successor in advance. It should mean ensuring there are choices. Which brings me back to Dipke. Perhaps the interesting question is not whether he becomes another Kanhaiya Kumar, another Kejriwal, or disappears from public memory. The real test of a political organisation is not whether it discovers a star. It is whether it knows what to do with all the talent standing around the star. (The writer is a learning and development professional. Views personal.)

Australian, UK varsities to set up campuses in Navi Mumbai

Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and Managing Director of the National Stock Exchange Ashish Chauhan at the WAVES 2025.
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and Managing Director of the National Stock Exchange Ashish Chauhan at the WAVES 2025.

Mumbai: Two leading universities from Australia and the United Kingdom on Friday signed an agreement with state government to set up their campuses in Navi Mumbai, CM Devendra Fadnavis said.


The projects envisage an investment of Rs 1,500 crore in each campus, Fadnavis told reporters at the World Audio Visual and Entertainment Summit (WAVES).


The campuses will come up at Educity, the mega education hub launched by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra in Navi Mumbai, Fadnavis said. Educity will have campuses of 10 to 12 top world universities which figure in the global top 100 ranking, he said.


“Today, MoUs were signed with the University of Western Australia and University of York to set up their campuses in Educity,” Fadnavis said.


Talks have been finalised with three more universities to set up campuses in Educity, he said, adding discussions are underway with five other foreign universities.


Nifty Waves index

The National Stock Exchange (NSE) on Friday announced the launch of Nifty Waves Index, comprising 43 listed companies that belong to the media, entertainment, and gaming industry.


The new index is designed to provide deep insights into the performance of one of the country's most dynamic sectors.


With a diverse ecosystem spanning film, television, digital platforms, music, and gaming, the Indian media and entertainment industry is undergoing a dynamic transformation, blending creative innovation with rapid technological adoption. "India's next significant export is its imagination --our stories, music, innovation, and creative spirit. Through WAVES, we are building a bridge between our rich cultural heritage and our boundless digital future. The launch of the Nifty Waves Index has provided us with a tool to measure success in this field and inspire many more entrepreneurs," Fadnavis said.


The weight of each stock in the Nifty Waves Index is based on free float market capitalisation subject to a cap of 5 per cent. The base date for the index is April 1, 2005, and the base value is 1,000. The index will be reconstituted semi-annually and rebalanced on a quarterly basis.


Ashishkumar Chauhan, MD & CEO, NSE said, "The Nifty Waves index is designed to provide deep insights into the performance of one of India's most dynamic sectors. It offers us a benchmark to understand market trends and unlock the full potential of India's creative economy".

Bollywood actor Shraddha Kapoor and Head Instagram at Meta Adam Mosseri during a session at WAVES 2025. Pic: PTI
Bollywood actor Shraddha Kapoor and Head Instagram at Meta Adam Mosseri during a session at WAVES 2025. Pic: PTI

Stars speak up

Speaking at a session, The Journey: From Outsider to Ruler, superstar Shah Rukh Khan recalled that his young self was a “bit brash, a bit overconfident and a bit reckless.” But he also acknowledges that that very confidence led him to take the path to what he’s achieved today. “So yes, thank you, young Shah Rukh Khan, for being so cool,” he quipped. The actor also underscored the power of laughter saying that if you can make your children—or your parents—laugh, “you will never be lonely”. Actor Kareena Kapoor Khan, while talking about why she’s never ‘chased’ English films, recounted an anecdote that shows the soft power and global reach of Indian cinema. She was dining at a restaurant when legendary Hollywood filmmaker, Steven Spielberg, came up to her and asked “Are you the girl who’s in that very famous Indian film about three students?’ I said, ‘Yes, that’s me.’ He said, ‘My God, I love that movie',” said the popular actress who carries forward the Hindi movie legacy of her filmmaker grandfather Raj Kapoor. Aamir Khan revealed an interesting fact—that in a film-obsessed country, “only 2 per cent of India’s population has access to watch movies in a theatre”. While speaking at a session called Studios of the Future, he ‘PK’ actor stressed on the need for more cinema halls. “My belief has always been that we need to have a lot more theatres in India. There are so many vast districts in India that don’t have a single theatre for people to watch films. I feel that one of the biggest issues that we have faced over decades is that we just don’t have enough screens,” he said.


Nita Ambani, founder and chairperson of the Reliance Foundation, hailed India as a blend of heritage and innovation, emphasising that India is home to the sacred sound of ‘Om’ and to Sanskrit which forms the foundation of several languages.


Institute of Creative Technology

Goregaon will be home to the Indian Institute of Creative Technology, to be set up by the Information and Broadcasting Ministry along with industry bodies such as FICCI and CII. Modelled on the lines of India’s top-tier institutions like IITs and IIMs, the IICT will offer specialized programs in VFX, animation, gaming, XR, and AI-driven storytelling.


"The truth is that the world is essentially, intrinsically and essentially diverse, and that pluralism has been suppressed in the past by both colonialism and big power dominance. As we seek now to democratise the international system, it is not enough to just assert political and economic independence. It is equally essential that we give voice to our traditions, to our heritage, to ideas, to practices, and to our creativity.”

S Jaishankar, Minister, External Affairs


"As a government, we must provide a fair chance for everyone to showcase their story to the world. We must incentivise local content promotion and enforce IP framework among other things. Focus is shifting towards local stories. We aim to build people-to-people and country-to-country exchanges. Tie-ups with government, industry and creators have, therefore, become indispensable. Practical steps include co-production treaties to ease licences and talent movement. We need joint funds for new tech, shared standards, and clear rules for ethical AI.”

Ashwini Vaishnaw, Minister, Information and Broadcasting


“We remain the home of the creator economy. Over the last three years, we've paid out over Rs 21,000 crore to creators and partners, media companies and music labels here in this market that creates the foundation for the great growth of the creator economy. I think the numbers show that our goal is to continue to provide the best tools possible, including leveraging AI to improve creation capabilities for our creators and provide them with multiple ways for them to generate revenue. Creators care about fame and fortune and if we can enable both of those then we remain the home for them.”

Gautam Anand, Vice President, YouTube Asia Pacific

Comments

bottom of page