top of page

By:

C.S. Krishnamurthy

21 June 2025 at 7:45:51 pm

A Spade Has No Party

There is something reassuring about a spade. It does not ask who is holding it before doing its job. It digs where it is told to dig. A hole made by a government worker is no different from one made by an opposition worker. The earth, fortunately, has no political affiliation. That simple image offers a useful way of looking at the Cockroach Janata Party, or CJP, a youth-led movement that has emerged around concerns over education, employment and accountability. Its significance may...

A Spade Has No Party

There is something reassuring about a spade. It does not ask who is holding it before doing its job. It digs where it is told to dig. A hole made by a government worker is no different from one made by an opposition worker. The earth, fortunately, has no political affiliation. That simple image offers a useful way of looking at the Cockroach Janata Party, or CJP, a youth-led movement that has emerged around concerns over education, employment and accountability. Its significance may ultimately lie less in whether it becomes a political force and more in what its emergence says about the changing relationship between young citizens and traditional politics. The CJP story reportedly began almost as a joke. But jokes sometimes possess an inconvenient habit of revealing truths that solemn speeches avoid. What began as satire attracted digital attention and developed into youth mobilisation. Beneath the humour lies something more serious: a generation that may not want another political flag, but wants existing flags to pay attention. A New Language Established political parties appear increasingly uncertain about how to speak to Gen Z. The problem may not be a lack of communication, but its direction. Traditional politics has often spent too much time speaking at the young and too little time speaking with them. Gen Z’s concerns are hardly confined to the digital world. Education, employment, security, dignity and accountability remain real-life concerns. Social media may provide the vocabulary, but the grievances are not virtual. Digital platforms have simply provided a meeting ground where concerns that conventional political structures may have failed to accommodate can find expression. This does not automatically make CJP a political party, nor does every participant necessarily subscribe to a common ideology. Its significance may instead lie in its ability to provide a forum for a generation-based articulation of concerns. We use the word “political” rather carelessly. Anything involving public affairs, government or collective decision-making is political in the broadest sense. But political does not necessarily mean partisan. A citizen demanding better examinations, employment opportunities or accountability from a minister is participating in democracy. He need not be preparing an election manifesto. This is where CJP becomes interesting. Its real test is whether it can remain an independent voice without eventually becoming another conventional political formation. Imagine a movement saying: we will criticise the government when it is wrong, the opposition when it is wrong, and ourselves when we are wrong. That would be an unusual political creature. It would also be a useful one. The real test of non-partisanship is not what a movement says about neutrality. It is whether it applies the same yardstick to everyone. If a government mishandles education, question it. If another government does the same, question it again. If a political party demands accountability in opposition but forgets the principle in power, call that out too. A spade should remain a spade even when somebody paints it in party colours. The Cricket Test The temptation to choose sides is understandable. Political discourse increasingly resembles cricket played by spectators who have forgotten that the scoreboard exists. A batsman from our team can edge the ball and we call it bad luck. The same edge by the other team becomes evidence of cheating. The problem is not cricket. It is our loyalty to the shirt. Democracy suffers from the same habit. We become so invested in who said something that we forget to ask whether it is true. An independent political voice must therefore be prepared to disappoint its own supporters. That is easier said than done. Digital technology has made mobilisation remarkably easy. But digital reach is not democratic depth. Followers are not necessarily volunteers, and viral outrage is not sustained civic engagement. The CJP’s challenge, therefore, is to convert attention into participation and measurable accountability. Every movement born outside established politics eventually encounters the gravitational pull of politics. Remaining independent is considerably harder in practice than in principle. CJP’s credibility will depend upon whether it can resist becoming what it criticises. Yet there is another, more interesting measure of success. If, a year from now, political parties begin placing education, employment and youth concerns more prominently at the centre of their agendas because they fear ignoring younger citizens, the CJP may have achieved its purpose without becoming a conventional party. Perhaps that is the deeper relevance of CJP that it may remind political forces that citizens are not permanent spectators in the democratic arena. (The writer is a retired banker and author. He can be reached at krs1957@hotmail.com. Views personal.)

Beyond Plastic: Reimagining Our Stewardship on World Environment Day

Let this World Environment Day not be an annual ritual of regret but a renewed commitment to regeneration.

Every year on June 5, World Environment Day invites the global community to reflect on the condition of our planet and on our own role in shaping it. Since 1972, this United Nations-led observance has evolved into the largest international platform for environmental advocacy, sparking initiatives and dialogues across continents. This year, hosted by the Republic of Korea, the spotlight falls on one of the most persistent environmental threats of our age: plastic pollution.


Plastic is everywhere. It has reshaped industries, revolutionised packaging, transformed healthcare and made modern life more convenient. But this convenience has come at a staggering ecological cost. Plastics, especially single-use items, are now embedded in every corner of the Earth - from the ocean floor to mountain peaks, from agricultural soils to human lungs. Over 11 million tonnes of plastic waste enter aquatic ecosystems each year. Microplastics, often invisible to the eye, have been detected in blood samples, placental tissue, breast milk and even clouds.


This is not just a litter problem. Plastics are deeply entwined with fossil fuels. Nearly all conventional plastics are derived from petrochemicals, and their production, distribution and degradation generate significant greenhouse gas emissions. One tonne of virgin plastic can result in nearly six tonnes of CO₂-equivalent emissions over its lifecycle. Open burning of plastic waste - still widespread across parts of Asia and Africa - releases toxic fumes, endangers human health and contributes to atmospheric warming. In soils, plastic residues alter microbial communities and hinder nutrient cycling. In oceans, plastics entangle marine life, damage coral reefs and leach chemicals that travel up the food chain. All this results in massive ecological disruption.


India offers both a cautionary tale and a source for solutions. With over 1.4 billion people and rapidly growing urban centres, India generates around 26,000 tonnes of plastic waste each day. Though regulatory frameworks such as the Plastic Waste Management Rules (2016) and the Single-Use Plastics Ban (2022) mark important steps, implementation remains inconsistent. Estimates suggest that only a small amount of plastic waste is effectively recycled with much of the rest ending up in landfills, rivers or unregulated dumpsites. And yet, India is also home to remarkable innovations and grassroots movements that can inspire global models.


Consider the work of Professor Rajagopalan Vasudevan in Tamil Nadu, who pioneered the use of shredded plastic in road construction. These plastic-bitumen roads are more durable, cost-effective and weather-resistant. In Mumbai’s Dharavi, local women’s cooperatives transform waste plastic into decorative and utilitarian items, thus simultaneously reducing landfill burden and supporting livelihoods. Pune’s ecobrick movement, where citizens compress plastic waste into PET bottles to create modular building blocks, shows how ordinary people can engineer extraordinary solutions. These examples underscore the potential of decentralised, community-led innovation in tackling global challenges.


But innovation must be supported by systems. India’s emerging circular economy vision holds promise. Digital platforms like Recykal are transforming how producers meet their Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) obligations by enabling end-to-end tracking of plastic waste across states. Deposit-refund mechanisms, already piloted in states like Uttarakhand, are restoring value to waste materials and encouraging responsible consumer behaviour. What is crucial now is to scale these efforts.


Addressing plastic pollution also demands moral clarity. The burden of mismanaged plastic does not fall equally. Marginalised communities, coastal populations and informal waste workers bear the brunt of exposure to toxic waste. India’s estimated five million waste pickers - many of them women and children - play a vital role in recycling, yet remain socially invisible and economically insecure. Any transition to cleaner alternatives must be just and inclusive.


Urbanisation intensifies the challenge. Cities like Delhi, Bengaluru and Mumbai generate vast quantities of plastic waste daily. Municipal authorities must move beyond ad hoc clean-up drives and build integrated waste management systems that prioritise segregation at source, decentralised composting, material recovery and clear accountability frameworks.


More than just bad habits, plastic pollution exposes flawed ideas of limitless growth and throwaway consumption. For years, development followed a linear path of extract, use, discard by ignoring ecological limits. That model has reached its breaking point. World Environment Day calls for a shift: from material accumulation to sustainability, equity and justice for future generations.


From global plastic treaty talks to local circular solutions, the momentum is building but it needs resolve. Citizens must shun single-use plastics, industries must design sustainably and policymakers must choose long-term planetary health over short-term gains.


As someone who has had the privilege of working at the interface of science, technology, and policy for decades, I believe that change often begins quietly - in classrooms, in homes, in local governments. It builds through networks of trust, through evidence-based dialogue and through the courage to challenge unsustainable norms.


Let this World Environment Day not be an annual ritual of regret but a renewed commitment to regeneration. The plastic crisis is not insurmountable; it is a design flaw, a policy gap and above all, a cultural habit. All of these can be changed. What we need is not another reminder but a collective decision to act.


The Earth is not a landfill. It is a living trust passed on to us by past generations, and entrusted to us by those yet to be born. We owe it far more than clever slogans or selective bans. We owe it our stewardship.

(The author is the former Director, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune, Visiting Professor IIT Bombay and Chair, Water Technology Initiative, Department of Science & Technology, Government of India. Views personal)

Comments

bottom of page