top of page

By:

Rashmi Kulkarni

23 March 2025 at 2:58:52 pm

Making a New Normal Feel Obvious

Normal is not what’s written. Normal is what repeats. The temple bell rings at the same time every day. Not everyone prays. Not everyone even walks in. Some people don’t care at all. And yet when that bell rings, the whole neighborhood syncs. Shops open, chores move, calls pause. The bell doesn’t convince anyone. It simply creates rhythm. That’s how “normal” is built inside a legacy MSME too. Not by speeches. By repetition. Quick recap: Week 1: You inherited an equilibrium. Week 2: People...

Making a New Normal Feel Obvious

Normal is not what’s written. Normal is what repeats. The temple bell rings at the same time every day. Not everyone prays. Not everyone even walks in. Some people don’t care at all. And yet when that bell rings, the whole neighborhood syncs. Shops open, chores move, calls pause. The bell doesn’t convince anyone. It simply creates rhythm. That’s how “normal” is built inside a legacy MSME too. Not by speeches. By repetition. Quick recap: Week 1: You inherited an equilibrium. Week 2: People resist loss, not improvement. Week 3: Status quo wins when your new way is harder. Week 4 is the next problem: even when your idea is good and even when it is easy, it can still fail because people don’t move together. One team starts. Another team waits. One person follows. Another person quietly returns to the old way. So, the old normal comes back … not because your idea was wrong, but because your new normal never became normal. Which Seat? • Inherited : people expect direction, but they only shift when they see what you consistently protect. • Hired : people wait for proof “Is this just a corporate habit you’ll drop in a month?” • Promoted : people watch whether you stay consistent under pressure. Now here’s the useful idea from Thomas Schelling: a “focal point”. Don’t worry about the term. In simple words, it means: you don’t need everyone convinced. You need one clear anchor that everyone can align around. In a legacy MSME, that anchor is rarely a policy document. It’s not a rollout email. It’s a ritual. Why Rituals? These firms run on informal rules, relationships, memory, and quick calls. That flexibility keeps work moving, but it also makes change socially risky. Even supportive people hesitate because they’re thinking: “If I follow this and others don’t, I’ll look foolish.” “If I share real numbers, will I become the target?” “If I push this new flow, will I upset a senior person?” “If I do it properly, will it slow me down?” When people feel that risk, they wait. And waiting is how the status quo survives. A focal ritual breaks the waiting. It sends one clean signal: “This is real. This is how we work now.” Focal Ritual It’s a short, fixed review that repeats with the same format. For example: a weekly scoreboard review (15 minutes) a daily dispatch huddle (10 minutes) a fixed purchase-approval window (cutoff + queue) The meeting isn’t the magic. The repetition is. When it repeats without drama, it becomes believable. When it becomes believable, people start syncing to it, even the ones who were unsure. Common Mistake New leaders enter with energy and pressure: “show impact”. So they try to fix reporting, planning, quality, procurement, digitization … everything. The result is predictable. People don’t know what is truly “must follow”. So everything becomes “optional”. They do a little of each, and nothing holds. If you want change to stick, pick one focal ritual and make it sacred. Not forever. Just long enough for the bell to become the bell. Field Test Step 1 : Pick one pain area that creates daily chaos: delayed dispatch, pending purchase approvals, rework, overdue collections. Step 2 : Set the ritual: Fixed time, fixed duration (15 minutes). One scoreboard (one page, one screen). Same three questions every time: – What moved since last time? – What is stuck and why? – What decision is needed today? One owner who closes the loop (decisions + due dates). Step 3 : Protect it for 8 weeks. Don’t cancel because you’re busy. Don’t skip because a VIP came. Don’t “postpone once” because someone complained. I’ve seen a simple weekly dispatch scoreboard die this exact way. Week one was sharp. By week three, it got pushed “just this once” because someone had a client visit. Week four, it moved again for “urgent work”. After that, nobody took it seriously. The old follow-ups returned, and the leader was back to chasing people daily. The first casual cancellation tells the system: “This was a phase”. And the old normal returns fast. One Warning Don’t turn the ritual into policing. If it becomes humiliation, people will hide information. If it becomes shouting, people will stop speaking. If it becomes a lecture, people will mentally leave. Keep it calm. Keep it consistent. Keep it useful. A bell doesn’t shout. It just rings. (The author is Co-founder at PPS Consulting and a business operations advisor. She helps businesses across sectors and geographies improve execution through global best practices. She could be reached at rashmi@ppsconsulting.biz)

Credibility is in Follow-Through

In today’s business landscape, success is often measured by scale, profitability and visibility. Founders who have built thriving companies are admired for their pace, ambition and the sheer volume of decisions they carry each day. Yet, increasingly, there is a subtle behavioural shift accompanying this success — one that rarely makes it to balance sheets but frequently determines long-term growth.


Across industries, many accomplished business owners struggle with following up on commitments they have willingly made. A promised introduction, a call that was to happen “next week”, a proposal that was meant to be shared — all remain unfinished, not because of ill intent, but because of overwhelming schedules. In some cases, this delay is accompanied by a quiet projection of busyness, as though scarcity of time itself has become a badge of status.


While such behaviour may feel harmless to the person practising it, the perception created on the receiving end is far more consequential.


In business, perception precedes opportunity. A founder who repeatedly fails to close loops, however profitable or influential, gradually earns a reputation that travels faster than they expect. People begin to hesitate. Potential collaborators think twice. Newer contacts feel unsure of where they stand. The confusion is subtle, but it is enough to stall momentum.


What is often overlooked is that trust is not broken in dramatic moments; it erodes in silence. When commitments are not honoured, others do not always confront the issue. Instead, they recalibrate expectations quietly and move forward cautiously — or elsewhere.


There is also a growing tendency among some leaders to use busyness as a signal of superiority. Being “too occupied” to respond is sometimes positioned as proof of importance. Yet, in mature business ecosystems, credibility is not built by demonstrating how unavailable one is, but by how responsibly one handles availability. Global leaders who command lasting respect are rarely the loudest or the most inaccessible; they are the most consistent.


Personal branding, contrary to popular belief, does not reside in public visibility alone. It is shaped decisively in private conduct. It is revealed in how one manages commitments, treats newer relationships, and handles power without spectacle. Every unreturned message and every delayed follow-up becomes part of a silent narrative that others construct about reliability.


For founders who have already achieved financial success, this narrative becomes especially critical. At higher levels, growth is rarely limited by skill or opportunity. It is limited by trust. Partnerships, referrals and strategic alliances are extended to those whose word is dependable, not merely impressive.


The irony is that many leaders experiencing stalled growth believe the solution lies in expansion — new markets, new offerings, new teams. In reality, the missing lever is often behavioural alignment. When success is matched with consideration, clarity and follow-through, growth becomes organic rather than forced.


The most respected personal brands in business are built not through grand gestures but through disciplined consistency. A simple, honest communication when time is genuinely constrained preserves goodwill far more effectively than silence ever could. The difference between the two is not operational; it is reputational.


Every business owner, whether conscious of it or not, is constantly branding themselves. Each interaction leaves behind an impression that influences future decisions made by others. Those who recognise this early refine not just their strategies, but their conduct.


Those who ignore it often discover too late that opportunities do not disappear — they simply choose someone else.


In a competitive environment where products can be replicated and services matched, behaviour remains the final differentiator. The founders who understand this do not merely grow their businesses; they build influence that endures.


For leaders serious about sustainable growth, this is no longer a soft consideration. It is a strategic one. And those willing to examine it honestly often unlock a level of progress that no marketing campaign alone can deliver.


Those interested in strengthening how their leadership, conduct and credibility translate into long-term business growth may explore a structured personal branding consultation at https://www.sprect.com/pro/divyaaadvaani — before small habits quietly become costly limitations.


(The writer is a personal branding expert. She has clients from 14+ countries. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page