top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Data Vindication

For years, India’s economic ascent has been narrated in two voices. One hailing it as the world’s fastest-growing major economy. The other, more sceptical, mutters about unreliable numbers, weak statistics and growth built on shaky accounting. The latest GDP estimates have given that second chorus far less to sing about.


According to the latest figures, real GDP grew by 8.2 percent in the second quarter of FY 2025–26 (July–September), and by 8 percent in the first half of the year. That makes India, once again, the fastest-growing major economy on the planet. The momentum is not confined to a single sector or a single quarter. High-frequency indicators like GST collections, power consumption, electronic payments and bank credit point to a broad-based expansion driven as much by household demand as by public investment.


Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has attributed the performance to three familiar planks of the Modi government’s economic architecture: fiscal consolidation, targeted public investment and structural reforms to lift productivity and ease of doing business. Roads, ports and digital infrastructure are being built at scale. Balance sheets of banks and of the state are cleaner than they were a decade ago. Private investment, long hesitant after the twin-balance-sheet crisis, is stirring again.


Even as these numbers have impressed markets, a peculiarly technical scepticism lingers abroad. The IMF, in a recent review, rated India’s national accounts system at a ‘C’ - its second-lowest grade - even while awarding the broader statistical system a ‘B.’ The implication, easily misread by critics, is that India’s headline growth figures are barely fit for serious analysis. That reading sits awkwardly with the fact that the same institutions, investors and ratings agencies routinely rely on these very numbers to make multi-billion-dollar decisions.


What these entities fail to grasp is that the popular image of India as a statistical black box is out of date. The informal economy today is less a shadow realm than a partially formalised ecosystem threaded through banking, taxation and digital payments.


Unreported income is not the same as unmeasured activity. Money that evades direct taxation often reappears in spending, deposits, school fees, loan repayments and asset purchases, all of which leave institutional trails.


A sustained 8 percent growth rate reshapes India’s geopolitical weight, deepens its appeal as a manufacturing alternative to China and strengthens its bargaining power in trade negotiations. At home, it raises expectations on jobs and social mobility.


For Western observers accustomed to equating transparency with slow growth and rapid growth with opacity, India’s combination of scale, speed and institutional depth sits uneasily with older development stereotypes. For India’s own anti-Modi detractors, persistent scepticism about GDP has served as a surrogate attack on the credibility of the state itself. The new numbers ought to silence them both. They suggest that growth is not an illusion conjured by creative accounting but a product of physical investment, expanding credit and rising consumption. 


Comments


bottom of page