top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

SS MP threatens to ‘bomb’ political opponents

Journalists staged a protest outside Balasaheb Bhavan against Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Dina Patil, condemning his alleged remarks against members of the media. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Mumbai North-East MP Sanjay Dina-Patil – who recently defected to the ruling ally Shiv Sena apparently went haywire on Thursday, hurling bomb threats at political opponents, spitting expletives at protestors, warning jounos of assault and warning anybody “to do whatever you can”, sparking a massive political...

SS MP threatens to ‘bomb’ political opponents

Journalists staged a protest outside Balasaheb Bhavan against Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Dina Patil, condemning his alleged remarks against members of the media. Pic: Bhushan Koyande Mumbai: Mumbai North-East MP Sanjay Dina-Patil – who recently defected to the ruling ally Shiv Sena apparently went haywire on Thursday, hurling bomb threats at political opponents, spitting expletives at protestors, warning jounos of assault and warning anybody “to do whatever you can”, sparking a massive political furore. Elected on a Shiv Sena (UBT) ticket, Dina-Patil lost his temper when he was questioned on his daughter and SS (UBT) Municipal Corporator Rajool Patil who went to meet ex-CM Uddhav Thackeray to express her allegiance despite her father’s defection to the Shiv Sena led by Deputy CM Eknath Shinde. Instead of replying, Dina-Patil, reported to be short-tempered, blew his top and reacted aggressively with abuses: “Record this on camera… I have spoken to you for 2 minutes, I respect you, you should do the same… Don’t mess with me. If you return here, I will thrash and send you back. I am saying this in front of the police, you do whatever you want.” Just a couple of days ago, Dina-Patil had threatened SS (UBT) workers protesting against him. “Anybody who tries to cross my path, I will send them to the crematorium or the hospital. We have committed five murders in the past. If you protest against me, I will throw bombs on you and enter your house to hammer you.” As these threats and unparliamentary language stoked a massive political row, SS (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut shot off a letter to Mumbai Commissioner of Police Deven Bharti, demanding that the police probe all the statements of Dina-Patil and ‘book him for murder’. On the alleged bomb threats, Raut said if Dina-Patil had acquired the explosives from some terrorist organisation, he should be arrested under the dreaded Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, dealing with terrorism, terming it as a matter of national security. Political Explosion The matter escalated into a full-fledged political brawl with Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) leaders like Congress’ Nana Patole, Vijay Wadettiwar; SS (UBT)’s Aditya Thackeray, Sunil Raut, Sushma Andhare; Nationalist Congress Party (SP)’s Supriya Sule, Dr. Jitendra Awhad, Jayant R. Patil, and many more, attacking Dina-Patil and demanding that Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis must act in the matter. Aditya challenged Dina-Patil to instantly quit as MP, recontest in the name of Shinde or PM Narendra Modi and then see the outcome. Andhare said till the MPs were with SS (UBT), they were cultured but after walking over to the Shiv Sena, they have lost all their etiquettes or fear of the laws. Faced with an embarrassing backlash, Bharatiya Janata Party’s Chandrashekhar Bawankule and Shiv Sena’s Omprakash Babarao alias Bachhu Kadu quickly tendered unconditional apologies to the media on behalf of Dina-Patil, while Minister Girish Mahajan attempted to equate the outburst with recent strong language used by Sanjay Raut, who had said that “Shinde has given birth to 6 traitors”. On Raut’s letter to the CoP, a defiant Dina-Patil declared: “Whatever I said, I did it openly. If the police feel any action is to be taken against me, I am ready to face the consequences.” He again slammed the media persons for "thrusting microphones at him”, going to the ‘other side’ (the MVA) and then returning to quiz him, prompting the TV Journalists Association and other media groups to protest and seek action against the belligerent MP. “Has the MP been provided (Y-Plus) security at public expense to threaten the media which is doing its duty or the political protesters?” asked an irate TV reporter. Dina-Patil launched a broadside against the MVA and dared those who dubbed him a ‘traitor’ to come to his constituency without any security. On the incident of five murders, he airily said: “It had happened before I was born”, but Raut retorted claiming to possess details of all those alleged killings. “I don’t need an entourage of 10 vehicles as I rule the hearts of the people. I have aligned myself with ‘real men’. Shinde Saheb has commended me for my stand,” he claimed. Fadnavis and Shinde commented briefly on the matter and later were closeted in a meeting to discuss the fallout of Dina-Patil’s utterances especially after the media launched strong protests in different parts of Mumbai.

In Failed Marriages, Men Aren’t Always the Villains

Failed Marriages

On a wintry Sunday afternoon in Mumbai, an upscale Bandra pizzeria was buzzing with families digging into pizzas and cheesecakes. Amid the din of children and teenagers, a table-for-eight had a group of men intently chatting over endless glasses of wine. Were they metaphorically drowning their sorrows? Probably so. Some were gesticulating animatedly and a few were listing quietly. The mood at the table was sombre but they still, quite obviously, had a common point to bond over. It later emerged that they were all members of a support group for ‘divorced dads’, men who couldn’t shed tears in front of their families or lawyers but sought solace in the company of like-minded sufferers.


Atul Subhash probably didn’t have such a support group to lean on. Or friends and family who could help. Or maybe he felt cornered by the system that, according to many men, favours women in such matters. The Bengaluru-based techie’s suicide has sparked debate, once again, if the domestic violence and divorce laws in India are highly tilted in favour of women. Maybe so. But then, it’s only a corrective measure to counter the years of oppression and violence that women have faced within their homes. A National Family Healthy Survey conducted between 2019 and 2021 showed some startling figures—that almost 30 per cent of married Indian women had faced some sort of violence. For years, women have been at the receiving end of violent acts; can we forget all those cases of dowry harassment and deaths which probably forced people not to want daughters? Even today, women face abuse—subtle and direct—in their marital homes. Indian laws relating to matters of marriage and protection of women within the household were framed to give women greater rights and a stronger voice and make stringent punishment a deterrent.


It’s also equally safe to presume that these laws and rights can be—and are—misused. Subhash’s blood-curdling suicide note accused his wife of ‘harassment and false cases’, drawing attention to the inconvenient social reality that exists but is rarely spoken about—how divorce laws in India are often weaponised against men. Murmurs for a ‘national commission for men’ are also growing, a year after such a proposal was shot down by the court.


Stirred by the case, all attention turned to the Supreme Court. A bench of the top court commented on the misuse of law, especially section 498(A) of the former Indian Penal Code which is now replaced by the Bharatiya Nyay Samhita. The court recognised that ‘there has been a growing tendency to misuse provisions like Section 498A of the IPC as a tool for unleashing a personal vendetta against the husband and his family by a wife.’ In a society that’s seen several years of oppression of women and harassment of young brides, stringent laws tend to protect the woman in a marriage.


For years, calls for addressing the physical, emotional, and financial toll of divorce on husbands have been dismissed, with allegations of harassment by wives often ignored by courts and society’s bias against men persisting. On a busy Friday, the Supreme Court issued eight criteria for determining alimony, likely to guide courts nationwide. On the same day, a PIL sought reforms in dowry and domestic violence laws, which have long protected women but sometimes unfairly penalized men. Meanwhile, prolonged family court battles continue to exact a heavy toll, consuming years that could be spent in better companionship and joy.


Being slammed with accusations of cruelty and violence cannot be easy to handle; having arrest warrants against one’s elderly parents in fictional cases of harassment can stab your emotional well-being and having to shell out large sums of money to an estranged wife who probably earns more than you, can be painful and shattering.


Break-ups and divorces are glamourised by the movies, with women swaying to ‘break up songs’, divorcees finding true love instantly after a legal decree or the ‘heroines’ digging into ice-cream tubs to recover from heartbreak. Divorces aren’t so smooth in real life, especially as many men would endorse. A health survey that I had read stated that divorce is the second most painful incident in one’s life after the death of loved ones. Support groups and seeking professional help from counsellors can be a way of healing and dealing with the pain and loss of a relationship that had once been the focal point of one’s life.


Mental health concerns are like an epidemic that’s waiting to blow up if not addressed. In times of increased professional competition and stress, fragile relationships, break-down of joint families and friendships moving to the virtual world, the best help can come from professional caregivers. An equal society should have laws that protect the rights of all without gender discrimination. But the onus of implementation lies with those who interpret the laws. Sensitisation of the families of those locked in a divorce battle, lawyers, police and the courts can help both men and women get justice. Marriage and divorce should be personal choices and not ones controlled by law.

Comments


bottom of page