top of page

By:

Bhalchandra Chorghade

11 August 2025 at 1:54:18 pm

Infrastructure moment in MMR

Mumbai: The Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) stands at a critical inflection point as the Mahayuti alliance secured near-complete control over key municipal corporations across the region. With aligned political leadership at the state and civic levels, the long-fragmented governance architecture of India’s most complex urban agglomeration may finally see greater coherence in planning and execution. For a region grappling with mobility stress, water insecurity and uneven urban expansion, the...

Infrastructure moment in MMR

Mumbai: The Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) stands at a critical inflection point as the Mahayuti alliance secured near-complete control over key municipal corporations across the region. With aligned political leadership at the state and civic levels, the long-fragmented governance architecture of India’s most complex urban agglomeration may finally see greater coherence in planning and execution. For a region grappling with mobility stress, water insecurity and uneven urban expansion, the question now is not what to build—but how quickly and seamlessly projects can be delivered. Urban mobility remains the backbone of MMR’s infrastructure agenda. Several metro corridors are at advanced stages, including the Andheri West–Vikhroli Metro Line 6 and extensions of the Colaba–Bandra–SEEPZ Metro Line 3. While construction has progressed steadily, coordination issues with municipal agencies—particularly related to road restoration, utilities shifting and traffic management—have often slowed execution. With elected civic bodies now politically aligned with the state government and agencies like MMRDA and MMRC, these bottlenecks are expected to ease. Decision-making on road closures, permissions for casting yards and last-mile integration with buses and footpaths could see faster turnarounds. Suburban rail projects such as the Panvel–Karjat corridor and additional railway lines on the Central and Western routes are also likely to benefit from smoother land acquisition and rehabilitation approvals, traditionally the most contentious municipal functions. Regional Connectivity MMR’s road infrastructure has expanded rapidly in recent years, but execution has often been uneven across municipal boundaries. Projects such as the Mumbai Coastal Road, the Goregaon–Mulund Link Road, the Thane–Borivali tunnel and the Airoli–Katai connector have regional significance but require constant coordination with local bodies for utilities, encroachments and traffic planning. Under a unified civic dispensation, authorities expect fewer inter-agency delays and greater willingness at the municipal level to prioritise regionally critical projects over hyper-local political considerations. The next phase of the Coastal Road, suburban creek bridges, and arterial road widening projects in fast-growing nodes like Vasai-Virar, Kalyan-Dombivli and Panvel could be streamlined as municipal corporations align their development plans with state transport objectives. Water Security Water supply remains one of the most politically sensitive infrastructure issues in MMR, particularly in peripheral urban zones. Projects such as the Surya Regional Water Supply Scheme and proposed dam developments in the Karjat region are designed to address chronic shortages in Mira-Bhayandar, Vasai-Virar and parts of Navi Mumbai. While these projects are state-driven, municipal cooperation is critical for distribution networks, billing systems and sewerage integration. With elected bodies replacing administrators, local governments are expected to accelerate last-mile pipelines, treatment plants and sewage networks that often lag behind bulk water infrastructure. Unified political control may also reduce resistance to tariff rationalisation and long-delayed sewage treatment upgrades mandated under environmental norms. Housing Integration One area where political alignment could have an outsized impact is redevelopment—particularly slum rehabilitation and transit-oriented development. Many large housing projects have stalled due to disputes between civic officials, state agencies and local political interests. A cohesive governance structure could fast-track approvals for cluster redevelopment near metro corridors, unlocking both housing supply and ridership potential. Municipal corporations are also likely to align their development control regulations more closely with state urban policy, enabling higher density near transport nodes and more predictable redevelopment timelines. This could be transformative for older suburbs and industrial belts awaiting regeneration. The return of elected municipal councils after years of administrative rule introduces political accountability but also sharper alignment with state priorities. Budget approvals, tendering processes and policy decisions that earlier faced delays due to political uncertainty are expected to move faster. Capital expenditure plans could increasingly reflect regional priorities rather than fragmented ward-level demands. However, challenges remain. Faster execution will depend not only on political control but on institutional capacity, contractor performance and financial discipline. Public scrutiny is also likely to intensify as elected representatives seek visible results within fixed tenures.

Jurist at the Helm

As Gen Z protests reshape Nepal’s political landscape, a former judge takes the reins.

Beset by mass protests and clamorous calls for change, Nepal’s rudderless political ship has turned to an unlikely helmswoman. On September 12, President Ram Chandra Poudel appointed Sushila Karki, former Chief Justice and anti-corruption crusader, as the interim Prime Minister of the crisis-ridden Himalayan state, dissolving Parliament and scheduling fresh elections for March 5, 2026. At 73, Karki became Nepal’s first woman Prime Minister.


Her elevation came in the wake of the so-called ‘Gen Z’ protests that forced the resignation of K.P. Sharma Oli, the erstwhile prime minister who had ordered a brutal crackdown on protesters. The demonstrators, who began their campaign over a controversial social media ban, had demanded not only Oli’s departure but also the dissolution of Parliament which they saw as a bastion of entrenched political interests. It was only after Karki received the explicit endorsement of key movement leaders, including Kathmandu’s maverick mayor Balendra Shah, that consensus on her appointment was reached.


Unlike career politicians, Karki’s background is rooted in jurisprudence. Born in 1952 in a modest farming family in eastern Nepal, she was the eldest of seven siblings and nurtured early political sympathies through family ties to Bishweshwar Prasad Koirala, Nepal’s first democratically elected prime minister. She studied political science at Banaras Hindu University before pursuing a law degree at Tribhuvan University in Kathmandu. Rising through the ranks of Nepal’s legal system, she became a Supreme Court judge in 2009 and served as Chief Justice from 2016 to 2017.


Her judicial tenure was marked by a resolute stance against corruption, culminating in several high-profile convictions notably that of Information Minister Jaya Prakash Prasad Gupta. Her zero-tolerance approach made powerful enemies, and in 2017, an impeachment motion was launched against her, accusing her of bias. Yet public outcry and judicial intervention saw the motion withdrawn, and Karki returned to office before retiring shortly thereafter.


Her rise to political leadership reflects an unusual but growing global pattern in times of crisis. Just as Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus was called upon to head Bangladesh’s interim government in 2024, Karki’s appointment signals a temporary but deliberate shift toward technocratic stewardship which is designed to restore stability and oversee democratic transition.


She faces a formidable challenge. The protests that ousted Oli left at least 51 dead and over 1,300 injured, including protesters, police officers and prisoners. The social media ban, seen as an attempt to suppress dissent, was widely condemned. With the army acting as both mediator and stabilizer, her government must navigate deep institutional distrust and growing political fragmentation.


Karki’s immediate challenge will be to hold credible elections amid lingering tensions. Her legal background and reputation for integrity are seen as assets in this delicate phase, though critics warn of the risks of technocracy sidelining genuine political debate.


Yet beyond the politics lies the symbolism of Karki’s appointment, which resonates deeply in a nation long plagued by corruption and institutional weakness. Nepal’s modern political history has been a turbulent one. The country transitioned from absolute monarchy to constitutional monarchy in 1990, only to abolish the monarchy entirely in 2008 after a decade-long Maoist insurgency that cost tens of thousands of lives. Since then, the democratic experiment has been marred by fractured coalition governments and repeated accusations of graft and nepotism. Electoral processes have often been undermined by political horse-trading, and powerful political dynasties like the Koirala and Oli families have long dominated Kathmandu’s corridors of power.


Karki is neither a political novice nor a revolutionist, but a jurist drawn from the judiciary’s ranks. All eyes are now on her to steer the country through its most turbulent chapter in recent history.

Comments


bottom of page