top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 4:29:04 pm

Algorithmic Anarchy

The NEET paper leak protests at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar should have remained a legitimate expression of student anger over the collapse of examination integrity. Instead, as the agitation escalated into clashes with the police, abusive sloganeering and an increasingly radical political campaign, Meta’s algorithms emerged as an invisible force multiplying the unrest. The controversy surrounding the brief removal of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s message to the youth in the aftermath of the...

Algorithmic Anarchy

The NEET paper leak protests at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar should have remained a legitimate expression of student anger over the collapse of examination integrity. Instead, as the agitation escalated into clashes with the police, abusive sloganeering and an increasingly radical political campaign, Meta’s algorithms emerged as an invisible force multiplying the unrest. The controversy surrounding the brief removal of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s message to the youth in the aftermath of the protests only reinforces that concern. Meta has attributed the takedown to a “technical glitch” and apologised. But when the world’s largest social media platform can temporarily suppress the message of the elected leader of the world’s largest democracy during a politically charged moments, the issue extends well beyond a single deleted post. Who decides what India sees? That question has become impossible to ignore during the Cockroach Janta Party’s protests. Across Instagram and Facebook, users have reported being inundated with CJP videos, reels and protest clips despite never following the organisation or engaging with similar political content. Whether this resulted from coordinated paid collaborations, recommendation algorithms or both deserves a thorough investigation. But the larger democratic concern is that public opinion is increasingly being mediated not by citizens, journalists or elected representatives, but by opaque algorithms designed in Silicon Valley and optimised for engagement rather than democratic responsibility. Meta’s recommendation engine is not a passive notice board. Every piece of political content that reaches millions has first been selected by an algorithm whose workings remain largely hidden from public scrutiny. This is hardly unique to India. Around the world, Meta has repeatedly been accused of amplifying polarisation, misinformation and political extremism because outrage keeps users engaged. From elections to ethnic conflicts and episodes of civil unrest, the company has faced persistent criticism that its commercial incentives reward divisive content over balanced discourse. Democracies cannot afford to outsource the architecture of public debate to corporations whose primary obligation is to shareholders rather than constitutional values. While citizens are entitled to challenge governments and demand accountability, there is an important distinction between a movement that expands because people are persuaded and one that appears to be algorithmically amplified into omnipresence. Equally disturbing has been the normalisation of abusive political language during the protests. When such content is repeatedly amplified through recommendation systems, platforms cease to be neutral intermediaries and become active participants in degrading democratic discourse. Platforms that influence elections, protests and public opinion must explain how political recommendations are generated and why particular narratives receive extraordinary amplification. Silicon Valley companies insist they are merely technology platforms. But their algorithms increasingly exercise editorial power. When software determines which protests dominate national conversations and whose voices disappear, technology has already become politics.

SIP vs STP vs SWP

In mutual funds, investors often hear three important terms - SIP, STP and SWP. These may sound technical, but they are actually simple and powerful facilities provided by mutual funds. They help investors invest, transfer and withdraw money in a disciplined and automated manner.


Systematic Investment Plan

This is the most commonly known concept. In an SIP, a fixed amount is automatically debited from your bank account on a fixed date and invested into selected mutual fund schemes.


For example, if a 30-year-old investor starts investing INR 10,000 per month for retirement and continues till the age of 55, the investment period is 25 years. Assuming a long-term return of around 12% per annum, this monthly investment can grow to approximately INR 1.70 crores.


Please note, INR 10,000 is only a small amount used for illustration. Your SIP amount should be sufficient for your goals. Ideally, investors should try to invest at least 30% of their in-hand monthly income.


The biggest benefit of SIP is discipline. You do not have to remember to invest every month. The process is automated. SIP also helps you invest through market ups and downs, reducing the stress of timing the market. That is why SIP is also popularly called Sapna-In-Progress.


Systematic Transfer Plan

In SIP, money moves from your bank account to a mutual fund. In STP, money moves from one mutual fund scheme to another.


This is especially useful when you have a lumpsum amount but do not want to invest it into equity funds in one shot. For example, an investor has INR 20 lakhs to invest for the long term. He may worry about market volatility if the entire amount is invested at one go.


In such a case, the money can first be parked in a debt mutual fund, and then gradually transferred to an equity mutual fund through STP. For example, INR 40,000 can be transferred every week over around 50 weeks. STP is flexible in terms of duration, frequency, amount and choice of schemes.


STP gives comfort, automation and gradual participation in equity markets.


Systematic Withdrawal Plan

This is the exact reverse of SIP. In SIP, money goes from your bank account to a mutual fund. In SWP, money comes from your mutual fund to your bank account at regular intervals.


SWP can be very useful after retirement. Suppose an investor has built a corpus of around INR 10 crores by the age of 55. He can set up an SWP to receive, say, INR 5 lakhs per month for his regular expenses.


If the corpus is invested wisely with proper asset allocation, the investor can receive regular income and still allow the balance corpus to grow over time. To understand the power of this, consider an actual scheme’s past performance. A corpus of INR 10 crores would have grown to around INR 30 crores over 15 years, even after the investor withdrew INR 5 lakhs every month.


In simple words, SIP helps you invest regularly, STP helps you transfer wisely, and SWP helps you withdraw systematically.


Used properly, these three tools can make wealth creation and retirement planning more disciplined, automated and peaceful.


(The author is Chartered Accountant and CFA (USA). Financial advisor. Views personal. He could be reached on 9833133605)

Comments

bottom of page