top of page

By:

Quaid Najmi

4 January 2025 at 3:26:24 pm

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court...

YouTuber challenges FIR, LoC in HC

Mumbai : The Bombay High Court issued notice to the state government on a petition filed by UK-based medico and YouTuber, Dr. Sangram Patil, seeking to quash a Mumbai Police FIR and revoking a Look Out Circular in a criminal case lodged against him, on Thursday.   Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe, who heard the matter with preliminary submissions from both sides, sought a response from the state government and posted the matter for Feb. 4.   Maharashtra Advocate-General Milind Sathe informed the court that the state would file its reply within a week in the matter.   Indian-origin Dr. Patil, hailing from Jalgaon, is facing a criminal case here for posting allegedly objectionable content involving Bharatiya Janata Party leaders on social media.   After his posts on a FB page, ‘Shehar Vikas Aghadi’, a Mumbai BJP media cell functionary lodged a criminal complaint following which the NM Joshi Marg Police registered a FIR (Dec. 18, 2025) and subsequently issued a LoC against Dr. Patil, restricting his travels.   The complainant Nikhil Bhamre filed the complaint in December 2025, contending that Dr. Patil on Dec. 14 posted offensive content intended to spread ‘disinformation and falsehoods’ about the BJP and its leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.   Among others, the police invoked BNSS Sec. 353(2) that attracts a 3-year jail term for publishing or circulating statements or rumours through electronic media with intent to promote enmity or hatred between communities.   Based on the FIR, Dr. Patil was detained and questioned for 15 hours when he arrived with his wife from London at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (Jan. 10), and again prevented from returning to Manchester, UK on Jan. 19 in view of the ongoing investigations.   On Wednesday (Jan. 21) Dr. Patil recorded his statement before the Mumbai Police and now he has moved the high court. Besides seeking quashing of the FIR and the LoC, he has sought removal of his name from the database imposing restrictions on his international travels.   Through his Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, the medico has sought interim relief in the form of a stay on further probe by Crime Branch-III and coercive action, restraint on filing any charge-sheet during the pendency of the petition and permission to go back to the UK.   Pasbola submitted to the court that Dr. Patil had voluntarily travelled from the UK to India and was unaware of the FIR when he landed here. Sathe argued that Patil had appeared in connection with other posts and was not fully cooperating with the investigators.

Studio Siege

A supposed film audition in Powai turned into a two-hour nightmare when 17 children were taken hostage by a man armed with an air gun and delusions of martyrdom. For the shocked citizens of Mumbai, it was a veritable real-life replay of ‘Dog Day Afternoon’ and other Hollywood films involving hostage situations and deranged men.


The unpleasant episode exposed not just the despair of the hostage taker, a certain Rohit Arya, but also society’s own blind spots, namely parental recklessness, bureaucratic neglect and the perils lurking behind everyday ambition.


By the time police bullets ended Arya’s rampage, the city had witnessed a chilling siege unfolding inside a cramped studio which exposed not only a desperate man’s meltdown but society’s own complacency as well.


In a rambling video recorded before the siege, the hostage taker had demanded no ransom, merely “ethical and moral” conversations. He ranted about unpaid dues from a state-run sanitation project, accusing bureaucrats of betrayal. His grievances, if any, had apparently festered into delusion. When police stormed the studio, Arya fired with his air gun and they returned a single real bullet, ending the standoff and his life.


It must be acknowledged that the police did their job with swiftness and restraint. Officers from Powai station arrived within minutes of the distress call, negotiated briefly and broke in before panic turned fatal. All 17 children, aged between eight and fourteen, were rescued unharmed.


Parents, understandably horrified now, must also confront their own lapse in judgment. How many paused to verify the legitimacy of RA Studios before sending their children off to an ‘audition’? Mumbai’s entertainment underbelly is rife with fraudsters, hustlers and unlicensed operators who promise stardom.


The case sheds a revealing light on the unregulated chaos of India’s amateur entertainment industry. Anyone with a rented space, a cheap camera and a social media handle can call themselves a producer. With no formal vetting or oversight, children are regularly drawn into auditions and shoots run by dubious individuals. The Powai siege has exposed how safety, in this setting, depends less on the law and more on luck.


There is also a cruel irony in this episode. That a man once engaged in educating children about hygiene ended up holding them hostage. It is a tale of delusion and a reminder that obsession, when fed by vanity and entitlement, can curdle into menace. Arya’s descent from civic activism to psychosis mirrors a society where grievance often finds no outlet until it explodes in spectacle.


The Powai hostage crisis will fade from headlines soon, reduced to another morbid curiosity in Mumbai’s endless ledger of crimes. But it should remain a warning. The line between desperation and danger is often crossed not by accident but by indulgence, whether by parents who outsource vigilance or by officials who ignore the unravelling of individuals. Rohit Arya’s story ended in death; the lesson it leaves behind should not die with him.

Comments


bottom of page