top of page

By:

Bhaskar Nath Biswal

13 May 2026 at 3:00:30 pm

Restoring Ethics in Higher Education

AI generated image In the cultural fabric of India, the educator has historically occupied a space higher than the temporal world, encapsulated in the sacred maxim ‘Acharya Devo Bhava’, the teacher is akin to the divine. This guru-shishya parampara was not merely an instructional methodology but a spiritual covenant where knowledge was transmitted alongside a rigorous code of moral rectitude. Today, that revered pedestal is fracturing. The deeply unsettling revelations surrounding the...

Restoring Ethics in Higher Education

AI generated image In the cultural fabric of India, the educator has historically occupied a space higher than the temporal world, encapsulated in the sacred maxim ‘Acharya Devo Bhava’, the teacher is akin to the divine. This guru-shishya parampara was not merely an instructional methodology but a spiritual covenant where knowledge was transmitted alongside a rigorous code of moral rectitude. Today, that revered pedestal is fracturing. The deeply unsettling revelations surrounding the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) leaks, involving the alleged complicity of university chemistry and botany professors, have laid bare a deeper systemic malaise. This is not an isolated incident of administrative lapse; it represents a profound crisis of academic ethics, signalling that the very custodians of the nation's intellectual and moral future are compromising the integrity of the system they were sworn to protect. Fragile Credibility As more cases of unethical behaviour within the teaching community emerge, ranging from plagiarized research and predatory journal publications to cash-for-marks scams, the credibility of the entire academic ecosystem hangs in the balance. The transformation of education from a noble mission into a transactional marketplace has eroded public trust. When professors, who are supposed to mentor the next generation of doctors, scientists and thinkers, engage in paper leaks and institutional fraud, they do not just cheat a system; they actively jeopardize public safety and institutional merit. The psychological toll on millions of honest, hardworking students who find their futures hijacked by the greed of a few privileged insiders is immeasurable. Historically, the government has recognized that the progress of the nation relies heavily on the quality and dignity of its teaching community. Significant fiscal measures, periodic pay commission hikes and enhanced service conditions have been implemented over the decades to attract and retain premier talent in academia. The underlying philosophy has been simple: by securing the financial and social well-being of educators, society ensures their autonomy and insulates them from corrupting influences. Furthermore, the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 was envisioned as a watershed moment to explicitly address these foundational cracks. The policy outlines a comprehensive framework for restructuring teacher education, establishing merit-based tenure tracks and fostering a culture of continuous professional development steeped in ethical practice. NEP 2020 explicitly aims to restore the status of teachers as the most respected members of society, linking accountability directly with institutional autonomy. Massive Disconnect In tandem with legislative policy, the University Grants Commission (UGC) has consistently formulated regulations to preserve academic hygiene. From setting up stringent Consortium for Academic and Research Ethics (CARE) reference lists to filter out fraudulent journals, to mandating anti-plagiarism software and institutional ethical committees, the regulatory framework exists. The UGC has repeatedly warned universities against malpractices and instituted strict punitive measures for academic dishonesty. Yet, despite these top-heavy policy interventions and regulatory mechanisms, a massive disconnect persists when these ideals translate to the ground level. The practical reality in Indian higher education institutions reveals a battlefield of perverse incentives. At the ground level, professors are often trapped in a hyper-competitive ‘publish or perish’ culture where quantitative metrics override qualitative excellence. Academic promotions and institutional funding are tied to bureaucratic checklists, forcing many to take ethical shortcuts. Furthermore, the massive commercialization of coaching industries and the hyper-inflation of grades have created immense external pressure, turning examinations into high-stakes battlefields where the temptation for financial kickbacks becomes overwhelming. Academic administrators are frequently selected based on political patronage rather than scholarly integrity. Restoring the tarnished image of the academic community requires a fundamental systemic recalibration. Ethical training must be integrated as a core, non-negotiable component of teacher training and doctoral coursework, rather than treated as a peripheral bureaucratic formality. Institutional audits must become transparent, shifting the focus from mere box-ticking to holistic evaluations of an educator's contribution to learning and mentorship. The teaching community itself must foster a culture of collective internal accountability, where peer pressure actively discourages ethical compromises instead of protecting errant colleagues. The crisis triggered by the NEET leaks is a final wake-up call for a nation that prides itself on its civilizational intellectual heritage. Reclaiming the sanctity of the ‘Acharya’ is not merely an exercise in nostalgic romanticism; it is an urgent structural necessity for the survival of India's democratic and developmental aspirations. Only when ethics are restored to the heart of pedagogy can the country rebuild the sacred trust between the teacher and the taught. (The writer is a former college Principal and Founder of Supporting Shoulders. Views personal.)

The Iran Crisis and India’s Gathering Fiscal Storm

As the war in West Asia continues to drive up crude prices and fiscal pressures, India’s economic resilience is being severely tested.

AI generated image
AI generated image

It has been nearly three months since the West Asian conflict began, and its ripple effects are striking us harder than the scorching summer sun in the subcontinent. The unfolding situation has already shaken the government’s risk management framework. For years, India benefited from a prolonged “Goldilocks” phase of economic stability, which helped cushion temporary disruptions. Yet no modern economy is built to withstand relentless external shocks whether from unending wars or recurring natural disasters. Growth flourishes only in an environment of peace and stability.


India’s vulnerability to turmoil in West Asia is hardly new. From the oil shocks of the 1970s to the Gulf War of 1991 and the Iraq conflict of 2003, every major disruption in the region has rattled India’s balance of payments, fuelled inflation and forced difficult fiscal trade-offs. Despite decades of diversification, the Indian economy remains deeply exposed to the geopolitics of energy chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz.


Cost Cutting

With the conflict unresolved, Prime Minister Modi has urged citizens to practice self-restraint, reviving COVID-era habits like remote work, virtual meetings, reduced travel, and deferring gold purchases. These steps aim to cut fuel imports, ease transport inflation, conserve foreign exchange, and safeguard India’s Rs. 690 billion reserves. Digital operations and limited travel also lower congestion, emissions, and business costs. By curbing crude demand, the country can soften inflation and free resources for infrastructure and welfare. This demand-side discipline complements RBI’s interventions, offering immediate relief while renewable transitions remain long-term. Its success depends on how faithfully citizens adopt it.


To curb inflationary pressures, the government reduced excise duties on petrol and diesel to offset soaring crude oil prices and kept fertilizer costs in check despite conflict-driven surges. These measures, however, have strained public finances and derailed the 4.3 percent fiscal deficit target.


At its 623rd meeting in Mumbai, the RBI Board approved a record surplus transfer of Rs. 2.87 trillion to the Central Government for FY2025–26, surpassing last year’s payout of Rs. 2.69 trillion. This marks the highest dividend in the bank’s history, offering temporary fiscal support amid severe external shocks and reinforcing the RBI’s role as both monetary authority and stabilizer. The payout reflects strong financial performance, with net income before provisioning rising 26.3 percent from Rs. 3.13 trillion in FY25 to Rs. 3.95 trillion in FY26. Expenditure grew 27.6 percent, gross income 26.4 percent, and transfer to the Contingent Risk Buffer (CRB) surged 143.8 percent to Rs. 1.09 trillion. The RBI’s balance sheet expanded 20.6 percent to Rs. 91.97 trillion.


Strategic Interventions

This surplus was driven by strategic interventions and favourable global dynamics. Large-scale forex operations - nearly $180 billion sold to defend the rupee - generated trading gains as dollar holdings were liquidated at high valuations. Elevated global interest rates boosted returns on foreign debt and currency assets, while a 10 percent dollar depreciation and 60 percent gold rally enhanced reserve values. Domestically, Rs. 9 trillion in government securities purchases expanded the balance sheet and interest earnings, while sovereign swaps moderated currency depreciation.


Under the revised Economic Capital Framework, the CRB was set at 6.5 percent of the balance sheet, down from 7.5 percent, to maximize surplus transfer during geopolitical stress. With the balance sheet expanding sharply, this required a larger nominal allocation of Rs. 1.09 trillion. A higher buffer would have reduced the dividend, while a lower one could have unlocked over Rs. 3.5 trillion but would have left the RBI exposed. The chosen balance safeguards resilience while still delivering a record payout.


This payout provides crucial non-tax revenue support to the Government. In the Union Budget, total dividends from PSUs, banks, and the RBI were projected at Rs. 3.16 trillion. The current payout amounts to 90.8 percent of the projections. While PSU banks like State Bank of India and Life Insurance Corporation of India add would receipts, falling oil PSU dividends will be offset, keeping the budgeted targets intact.


Yet fiscal strain persists. To shield farmers, the government-maintained urea price controls, absorbing global cost increases. As a result, the fertilizer subsidy bill for FY27 is projected to rise by Rs. 70,000 crore to Rs. 2.41 trillion marking a 40 percent jump, thereby offsetting gains from the RBI’s record transfer.


The full impact of the ongoing war is yet to unfold, but it is already clear that the government will miss its fiscal deficit target of 4.3 percent, which was premised on average crude oil prices of $85 per barrel. Every $10 increase in crude prices widens the deficit by about 40 basis points. With crude currently hovering around $100, the fiscal strain is expected to be considerably higher, pushing the deficit well beyond initial projections.


Alternative Measures

As the evolving global scenario is beyond India’s control, several policy adjustments merit attention. First, sourcing and supply chain diversification should be deepened by maintaining the shift toward Atlantic Basin crude and Russian imports, while securing long-term LNG and fertilizer feedstock agreements outside the Strait of Hormuz. Second, the continuous pursuit of the reform agenda remains essential. Third, dynamic subsidy management and exploration of direct benefit transfer options for subsidy disbursement are necessary. The government should also concentrate on accelerating adoption of high-efficiency alternatives like Nano Urea that can reduce bulk chemical imports and ease fiscal pressure without undermining crop yields.


On the monetary front, RBI’s use of its Rs. 690 billion reserves and swap operations has helped moderate currency volatility, but persistently high crude prices above $120 per barrel and continued rupee weakness may necessitate policy rate hikes to anchor inflation expectations. Aligning these monetary measures with government-led energy conservation is vital to safeguarding India’s external balance and macroeconomic stability.


The trajectory of the West Asian conflict is in uncertain terrain. Even in the best-case scenario of hostilities ending soon and the Strait of Hormuz reopening, supply chains would take at least three months to normalize. This disruption has already slowed India’s growth momentum in the first half of FY27, posing a significant hurdle to the Viksit Bharat mission.


The ongoing crisis has once again exposed structural fault lines in the way India’s economy has evolved. While the country has shown resilience against international pressures, it remains far from achieving the kind of global economic dominance that China commands. The government continues to push forward with reforms, but these efforts have yet to gain the full traction and recognition they deserve. Amid these challenges, RBI’s strong institutional framework has proven to be a critical shield, helping stabilize the economy during external shocks. Without a realignment and reinforcement of the domestic ecosystem, the vision of a Viksit Bharat will merely remain an aspirational one.


(The author is a Chartered Accountant with a leading company in Mumbai. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page