top of page

By:

Rajiv Shah

22 September 2025 at 8:32:23 pm

New Alliances, New Pressures, New Fault Lines

To its west, old relationships in the Gulf are acquiring new strategic and military dimensions. Across the Atlantic, Washington is increasingly using tariffs as an instrument of foreign policy. At the same time, India holds the BRICS presidency in 2026 and prepares to host its summit when the grouping is being watched in the West as a potential challenge to the American-dominated global financial order. Individually, these developments may appear unrelated. Put together, they reveal a larger...

New Alliances, New Pressures, New Fault Lines

To its west, old relationships in the Gulf are acquiring new strategic and military dimensions. Across the Atlantic, Washington is increasingly using tariffs as an instrument of foreign policy. At the same time, India holds the BRICS presidency in 2026 and prepares to host its summit when the grouping is being watched in the West as a potential challenge to the American-dominated global financial order. Individually, these developments may appear unrelated. Put together, they reveal a larger geopolitical churn in which alliances, energy, trade, currencies and economic coercion are becoming interconnected. India finds itself almost at its centre. The emerging Saudi Arabia–Türkiye–Pakistan security equation deserves particular attention. Saudi Arabia brings enormous financial and energy influence; Türkiye possesses considerable military strength, NATO experience and an expanding defence industry; Pakistan brings a large military establishment and nuclear capability with the open support of Washington. Any arrangement containing a collective-defence commitment naturally acquires significance beyond ordinary diplomatic cooperation. Alongside it, another strategic convergence has gradually developed among India, Israel and the UAE. It would be incorrect to describe this as a formal military alliance. Yet geopolitics does not operate through defence treaties alone. India's extensive defence and technology relationship with Israel, its rapidly expanding economic and strategic partnership with the UAE, and the UAE-Israel relationship following the Abraham Accords have created considerable common ground. I2U2—bringing together India, Israel, the UAE and the United States—added another institutional dimension. Thus, without necessarily becoming opposing military camps, two interesting strategic formations are visible across West Asia: Saudi Arabia–Türkiye–Pakistan and the looser India–UAE–Israel convergence. Balancing Challenge India faces a similar balancing challenge. The Gulf is not a distant geopolitical theatre for New Delhi. Nearly nine million Indians live and work there. India's energy security, investments, trade and remittance flows are closely connected with the region. The proposed India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor also requires relative stability across this geography. Polarisation in West Asia can therefore rapidly become an Indian economic and strategic problem. There is another question Indian planners cannot ignore. If a future India-Pakistan confrontation escalates, how would any collective-defence commitment involving Pakistan be interpreted by Saudi Arabia and Türkiye? It would be alarmist to assume that either country would automatically enter a conflict against India. Saudi Arabia, in particular, has substantial economic and strategic interests in maintaining good relations with New Delhi. Nevertheless, defence planners are paid to examine possibilities before they become crises. While these equations develop in India's neighbourhood, economic pressure is emerging from Washington. The US Senate has voted 86–11 for legislation intended to increase pressure on Russia by targeting major purchasers of Russian energy. The measure could authorise tariffs reaching 100 per cent against goods from countries continuing large-scale purchases of Russian oil and gas, with India among those potentially exposed. China is powerful enough to shrug off similar challenges from the West." However this does not mean that America has already imposed a 100 per cent tariff on India. Further legislative steps remain necessary, and presidential waiver provisions are important. But the overwhelming Senate vote carries a political message that New Delhi cannot dismiss. Tariffs are no longer merely tools of trade protection; they have become instruments of geopolitical coercion. Washington's argument is understandable: revenues from Russian petroleum help sustain Moscow's economy during the Ukraine war, and reducing those revenues increases pressure on Russia. But in that case what about European countries who too were/are customers of Russian oil? India's question is equally legitimate: who should determine where India purchases the energy required by more than 1.4 billion people? If Russian crude remains commercially advantageous and helps contain domestic energy costs, New Delhi cannot reasonably be expected to make every energy decision according to another country's geopolitical priorities. Strategic partnership cannot become strategic obedience. This is where BRICS enters the larger picture. India holds the BRICS presidency in 2026 and will host its leaders at an unusually sensitive moment. BRICS is no longer merely the original grouping of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Its expansion has considerably increased its demographic, energy and geopolitical weight. More importantly, discussions around BRICS increasingly touch a sensitive nerve in Washington: alternative payment mechanisms, local-currency trade, development finance and the possibility of gradually reducing dependence upon the dollar-dominated international financial system. The BRICS Summit this time is poised to take some decisive steps which may affect western interests especially US. (The writer is an advocate, legal, geopolitical and public policy analyst. Views personal.)

Who is 17-year-old Nikita Casap charged with murdering his parents to fund plot to assassinate Trump?



Nikita Casap, a 17-year-old from Wisconsin, has been accused of killing his parents to get money for a plan to assassinate former U.S. President Donald Trump and overthrow the government, according to an unsealed federal warrant.


Last month, Casap was formally charged in Waukesha County with first-degree murder, theft, and other crimes related to the deaths of his mother, Tatiana Casap, and his stepfather, Donald Mayer, The Associated Press reported.


Police discovered the bodies of Tatiana (35) and Mayer (51) on February 28, after family members requested a welfare check. Mayer had missed work, and Nikita had been absent from school for nearly two weeks. Authorities believe the murders actually happened on February 11. Due to advanced decomposition, the victims were identified using dental records.


Casap is currently being held at the Waukesha County Jail on a $1 million bond and is expected to enter a plea in court next month. The federal allegations stem from an FBI warrant unsealed on Friday.


Who is Nikita Casap?

Nikita Casap, a high school student, faces nine felony charges, including two counts of first-degree murder and two counts of hiding a corpse, according to online court records.


Authorities claim Casap shot his parents at their home near Milwaukee and lived with their decaying bodies for weeks. He later fled with $14,000 in cash, passports, jewelry, and the family dog. Police arrested him in Kansas during a traffic stop and found a .357 Magnum revolver, $14,000 in $100 bills, more than $14,000 in jewelry, and the dog in his vehicle, CNN reported.


Federal investigators said Casap had bought a drone and explosives and shared his violent plans with others, including a Russian-speaking contact. His intentions were reportedly detailed in a three-page antisemitic manifesto where he praised Adolf Hitler.


The FBI’s federal warrant also included messages from TikTok and Telegram. According to the document:

“Casap appears to have written a manifest calling for the assassination of the President of the United States. He was in touch with other parties about his plan to kill the President and overthrow the government of the United States.”

It also stated:

“The killing of his parents appeared to be an effort to obtain the financial means and autonomy necessary to carrying out his plan.”

Federal charges against Casap include attempting to assassinate the president, conspiracy, and the use of weapons of mass destruction. Authorities also believe he planned to flee to Ukraine and shared this plan with the Russian speaker.


Extremist Beliefs

Casap’s phone reportedly contained materials linked to “The Order of Nine Angles,” a group described as holding neo-Nazi and racially motivated extremist views. Investigators also found images and messages about building bombs, terrorist attacks, and killing the president.


The manifesto included violent anti-government statements and admiration for Hitler. One part, according to the affidavit, said:

“As to why, specifically Trump, I think it’s pretty obvious. By getting rid of the president and perhaps the vice president, that is guaranteed to bring in some chaos.”

The document also featured slogans like:

“HAIL HITLER HAIL THE WHITE RACE HAIL VICTORY.”

Legal Defense

Casap’s public defender, Nicole Ostrowski, has asked the court to dismiss some of the charges, including theft, arguing that the prosecution has not fully laid out its case. “He is still in high school,” she said in court on March 12.

CNN also reported that a classmate told authorities Casap had discussed wanting to kill his parents but initially didn’t have a gun. He later said he would befriend someone with a weapon and steal it.


Nikita Casap is scheduled to appear in court for arraignment on May 7.

Comments

bottom of page